Posts Tagged ‘Olivier Assayas’

  • AFI Fest Day 1: Après Mai and Wrong

    0

    After the premiere of Hitchcock kicked off this year’s AFI Fest on Thursday night, the festival started for real Friday afternoon with quite a spate of highly anticipated films, including many of the most buzzed about films from Cannes, TIFF, Sundance, and other major fests. Most of the films I’m catching are ones that have already been reviewed on Row Three from other fests, so rather than do full reviews, I’m just going to write day by day recaps with my take on each film and the festival experience in general.

    All AFI Fest screenings are free and you can reserve tickets online at www.afi.com/afifest. Keep checking even if the screening you want is sold out, as they continue to release tickets as the show time nears, and every screening also has a rush line if you don’t get a ticket in advance.

    Après mai (Something in the Air)

    I put the original French title Après mai (After May) in the title of this post, even though the film is known here by its English title Something in the Air, because for one thing it’s shorter, but also because it’s much more fitting. The film begins near Paris in 1971, three years after the fateful demonstrations and riots of May 1968 that symbolized and foreshadowed political revolt throughout Europe in the late 1960s. The main characters are high school students in 1971, likely a few years too young to have taken part in the 1968 uprisings, but growing up in a very politically charged environment and desiring to take up the mantle of activism themselves. The first section of the film sees these youngsters fired up, printing inflammatory pamphlets, demonstrating in the streets (an action quickly squelched by baton-wielding police), graffiting their school and tossing Molotov cocktails at guards who threaten them with legal action.

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • TIFF 2012 / Cinephilia Française: Something in the Air (2012)

    0

    “Nothing tells memories from ordinary moments. Only afterwards do they claim remembrance on account of their scars.” – from Chris Marker’s La Jetée (1962)

    By 1971, the year in which Olivier Assayas’ Something in the Air (titled Après Mai in French) kicks off, the film containing this wise bit of narration was already nine years old, and the French New Wave, to which it is loosely connected through timing and Marker’s affiliation with such figures as Agnès Varda and Alain Resnais (who are linked to that key period of film history, but often considered as a separate contingent of it under the term “Left Bank”), was a thing of the past. So too was May 1968, along with the feelings of solidarity and turbulence given off by the student and worker uprisings that gripped France in that short period of time, born from the striking parties’ broiling anger and determination to fight against the inadequacies of President de Gaulle’s government. Assayas grew up in a post-May ’68 France (as he describes in his autobiographical book A Post-May Adolescence: Letter to Alice Debord, which has been recently published in English for the first time by the Austrian Film Museum to coincide with Something in the Air’s expanding festival run) and established himself as both a film critic for the hallowed Cahiers du Cinéma and a filmmaker in a post-New Wave French film industry. Thus, in both politics and cinema, he was forced to come of age and find his true place without the comforting, unifying pull of a focused cause shaped by the hopes and fervor of like-minded comrades. He was truly of a lost generation left in the shadows of momentous changes and dramatic events that had long since passed, leaving behind a strange climate of ambiguity and aimlessness. Fortunately, Assayas (as well as other filmmakers of his time, including Claire Denis and Arnaud Desplechin) realized that the best way to challenge the New Wave’s legacy was to simply not challenge it, opting instead to better understand his personal relationship with story, character, theme, and form in cinematic terms, a focus that has successfully resulted in one of contemporary cinema’s most inspiring and exciting bodies of work.
    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Cinecast Episode 245 – White People Cure Racism Through Football

    20

    Welcome back to our little show. Lots of in-house business items on the table this week, including the first grading of this semester’s homework assignments. Kurt and Matt discuss found footage superpower movie Chronicle. We delve into the state of the reborn Hammer studios with spooky ghost tale, The Woman in Black. Then we talk Clint Eastwood, Chrysler and the state of the Nation through Advertising and Politics. The Watchlist covers a fair bit of talk on David Mamet, but also the woefully received Clint Eastwood rugby movie, Invictus. Also, terrorism, Carlos and the films of Olivier Assayas. And Miranda July revisited. It’s a pleasantly meandering show in an otherwise quiet movie-going month. Join Us.

    As always, please join the conversation by leaving your own thoughts in the comment section below and again, thanks for listening!


     
     

     

    To download the show directly, paste the following URL into your favorite downloader:
    http://rowthree.com/audio/cinecast_12/episode_245.mp3

     
     
    Full show notes are under the seats…
    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Cinecast Episode 163 – The Jesus Camp of Comic Book Movies

    28

     
    By audience request, a special welcome to FilmJunk’s Jay Cheel (also of The Documentary Blog) as he drops by the virtual studio for this cinecast episode to help level the playing field on our SPOILER quite divided impressions of Kick-Ass. Of course Matt Gamble is here to help with that discussion as well representing the comic-nerd side of the equation. We are also in the midst of the Minneapolis Film Festival, so there is be some talk on that cinematic smörgåsbord as well as a critical mention of the 6 hour road-show edition of British TV mini Red Riding Trilogy. The usual DVD picks and other bits of movie related banter, including must-see Aussie noir, The Square, a break down on the Howard Stern saga known as Private Parts and Earth Day visual extravaganza Oceans. Thanks for dropping by and taking the time to listen the show; we are glad to have you along and welcome feedback and other forms of kick-assery in the comments section..


    To download the show directly, paste the following URL into your favorite downloader:
    http://rowthree.com/audio/cinecast_10/episode_163.mp3

     
     
     
    Full show notes are under the seats…
    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Demonlover – Unseen Movie Marathon

    10
    unseenmovies

    This is the first of at least 224 planned posts in which I shall slowly work through my DVD collection. The reason for doing this is first and foremost to admit that I have a problem. I buy way too many DVDs that I want to watch but never watch. On the morning of May 24th, 2009 I owned 224 DVDs which I have never seen. I have never seen them theatrically, on television, on VHS, on Beta or even by means of the DVD which I own and possess on the shelf. My plan is to watch at least one of these each week. If I’m lucky I will see more than one but to keep this reasonable considering my time restraints one a week is pretty good. I will write up my thoughts on each movie.

    I can’t be the only one with this problem and I hope that by doing this I will encourage you to watch your unwatched DVDs instead of going out and catching some movie that is forgettable. As an example instead of going to see Wolverine this past weekend I decided to sit down and watch Olivier Assayas’ Demonlover.

    So I now present to you the first of hopefully many reviews.

    Demonlover

    Demon Lover DVD CoverI purchased Demonlover a few months ago when a local DVD rental shop was going out of business. I could not remember who had recommended this Olivier Assayas film to me but I knew it had been recommended and since everything was cheap I figured why not throw it in the collection. I am really glad that I did purchase it as it is a movie that I think I’m going to revisit a few times. I am sure that subsequent viewings of Demonlover are going to show me more and more little pieces of information that I missed on the initial viewing. Demonlover throws you immediately into the mix with very little explanation and it really pays off.

    Demonlover opens with Dianne (Connie Nielson) taking notes for her employer, Hervé (Charles Berling) on a late night flight while everyone else sleeps. The next morning we watch as Dianne drugs another woman on the plane. By the time the plane lands we learn that the woman she drugged was a supervisor (Dominique Reymond) and business partner to Hervé. From here on in we watch as high stakes business espionage plays out in front of us. I do not want to spoil any of the plot so I’ll just say that it involves companies competing over a new form of pornographic anime that is set to revolutionize the industry.

    While I really enjoyed watching the twists and turns of the plot what truly won me over for the first two thirds of Demonlover are the quiet moments. Assayas does an excellent job of balancing the fast paced plot with these quite moments. He is willing to give his characters time to breathe when necessary. The tension is always their but you get the feeling that they are able to escape for short periods and I really enjoyed this as they some of the most beautiful scenes in the movie.

    Demonlover

    Unfortunately, I do feel that Demonlover continues on a bit longer than necessary. There is a scene between Dianne and another employee that really should be the conclusion. I understand that he wanted to make sure everyone watching would understand what the movie has to say but by this point I feel that anyone who has been paying attention should be able to come to the conclusion which Assayas wanted and the extra 20 or so minutes feels out of place and really comes across as a blunt hammer. This is especially true in the last couple of minutes which really felt like Assayas was not willing to trust his audience.

    Overall though I really enjoyed Demonlover and I plan on revisiting this one in the future as I am sure I missed small pieces of information that will make it an even more fulfilling watch.

  • Finite Focus: Do you like Girls? (Irma Vep)

    2

    On this weeks Cinecast, there was a bit of a discussion (and a Top 5) on actors playing themselves in movies. Often when an actor plays ‘themselves’ in a film, it is either a minuscule cameo or parody of their public persona. Rarely is this device used in a deep (or human) way to actually get at something beyond a simple laugh or a little meta tomfoolery. Yet in Olivier Assayas‘ wonderful Irma Vep, an autocritique of French cinema (and cinema in general), the gorgeous Chinese superstar Maggie Cheung hits just the right notes to spring forth warmth and generosity to balance out the satire and the critical commentary which the film often has on its mind. While not necessarily the films most talked about scene, the clip below is one of the films most honest and giving moments from its lead actress. Shortly after the films release, Assays wrote this, in regards to the scene:

    “There was a disturbing occurrence that became one of the shoot’s strongest moments. It was the second take of the scene where Mireille (Bulle Ogier) reveals Zoe’s homosexuality, or rather bisexuality, to Maggie. Something occurred, supported by Bulle’s insistence, guile and subtlety, which I never expected would come about so blatantly. Maggie was flustered, she blushed, she stammered, gave a hint of a smile, tried to find a composure that escaped her, and even looked at me to know if I was going to say cut or not – to which I of course didn’t respond. In that single moment everything came together, everything tied into a shot that is entirely in the film’s final cut. It conveys all the truth of the situation.”

    It is at this point where acting crosses the line into truth and fiction blurs into documentary. It makes bloody fine cinema:


     
     
    (Related: My Full Review of the Irma Vep “Essential Edition” DVD in which the director’s quote comes from a printed essay on the film in the accompanying booklet)

  • Hidden Treasures – Week of August 10th

    5

    Late with last week’s posting, and early with this week’s! I’m putting up Hidden Treasures a few days in advance because I’m going on vacation, and didn’t want to miss a week (especially as we close in on the century mark. With this week’s offering, the count is 90 films in Hidden Treasures since the series began on Row Three back in January). Enjoy!

    Crooklyn (1994)
    A semi-autobiographical work, Spike Lee’s Crooklyn (based on a screenplay written by his two siblings, Joie and Cinque) is the story of the Carmichaels, an African-American family living in Brooklyn in the 1970’s. Woody Carmichael (Delroy Lindo) is an out-of-work musician who’s making the most of his unemployed status, spending his days composing his own brand of music. As a result, his wife Carolyn (Alfre Woodard) must go back to work to support their five children. Their daughter, Troy (Zelda Harris), finds it difficult living day-to-day with her four brothers, all of whom specialize in stirring up mischief. She bickers with them constantly, and rolls her eyes at their repeatedly childish behavior. But over the course of one eventful summer, Troy will grow up, learning first-hand that love and devotion are necessary tools in overcoming the difficulties life occasionally throws your way.

    Due to its nostalgic tone, Crooklyn is considered by some to be Spike Lee’s lightest film to date. Yet while it may be a contrast to the director’s more challenging films (Do The Right Thing, Malcolm X, Jungle Fever), Crooklyn isn’t all fun and games. Woody and Carolyn argue often, mostly over money but also because Carolyn wants her husband to go back to playing the music everyone wants to hear, namely rock and roll. Having spent years in a popular band, Woody is tired of playing to appease others, and wants only to play the music that appeals to him, even if there isn’t much of an audience for it. The two also take a much different approach towards the household finances. Carolyn works hard for the money that helps them scrape by, while Woody doesn’t think twice about bouncing the occasional check, putting them right back at square one. Even in raising the children, they don’t always see eye-to-eye. Carolyn is a strict disciplinarian, demanding that the kids finish every bit of their dinner (right down to the much-despised black-eyed peas), while Woody brings home ice cream and cake for dessert, often against his wife’s wishes. While the tension found in Crooklyn is certainly not on the same scale as Lee’s more notable works, where he tackled such social issues as racism and interracial relationships, the film does provide a glimpse into the more personal drama of home life, and the conflict that naturally arises within that environment from time to time.

    Yet despite Crooklyn’s occasional forays into the dramatic, there’s no denying the fact that Spike Lee brought a genuine feeling of nostalgia with him to this film; a love of this time period, and this neighborhood. Even the most emotionally charged scenes have a somewhat lighthearted tone lurking just underneath, and if Crooklyn is any indication, Lee obviously harbors nothing but fond memories of his own childhood. That’s the way it goes with such memories, especially when you’re surrounded by love on all sides: even the times that weren’t particularly good somehow seem as if they were.

    Under the Sand (2000)
    Francois Ozon’s Under the Sand is a tense, troubling drama; the story of a woman whose life is thrown into chaos when her husband vanishes without a trace. It is a loss so devastating that the only way she can get through the day is to pretend it never happened.

    English teacher Marie Drillon (Charlotte Rampling) has been happily married to Jean (Bruno Cremer) for many years. While the two are away on vacation, husband and wife decide to take a day trip to the beach, where Marie naps while Jean goes for a swim. When Marie wakes from her nap, however, Jean is nowhere to be found. After a frantic search ends in frustration, the authorities have no choice but to presume that Jean has drowned. Marie does eventually get on with her life, returning to work and socializing with friends, yet she cannot accept the fact that Jean may be gone forever. For her, his disappearance is an unanswered question eating away at her mind: Is Jean dead, or did he simply walk away, looking to start a new life? The answers elude her, leaving Marie emotionally stilted, and clinging to the fading hope that Jean will one day return to her.

    One of the strengths of Under the Sand is the way it presents its mystery. Truth be told, we’re as much in the dark regarding Jean’s fate as Marie is. After all, we never actually see Jean go into the water. Did he really go swimming, as he said he was going to do, or did he run off? Much like Marie, we simply don’t know. Unlike her, however, we come to accept the fact that Jean’s return is increasingly unlikely with each passing day, especially when you consider that there are only two possible scenarios to explain his disappearance. On one hand, he drowned; on the other, he quietly walked away. Whichever is the actual chain of events, it’s obvious to us that a joyful reunion of man and wife will never occur.

    Yet, despite this, the film is still utterly fascinating, thanks in large part to the wonderful performance of Charlotte Rampling as Marie, who strikes a perfect balance between maturity and repudiation. In most films, when a character is in denial, he or she will act in a completely atypical manner, losing control of their emotions and roaming through life in a daze. To her credit, Rampling never falls back on the obvious in her portrayal. While her Marie is certainly in denial, she nonetheless remains resilient, strong-willed, and always in control, which is how a woman of Marie’s stature would handle such a tragedy.

    Marie is the tragic figure of Under the Sand, a woman who could easily survive on her own, yet has no desire to do so, grasping instead at a hope that has been all but extinguished. In the end, we do not weep for Jean; whether dead or alive, he has at least reached an end. Our tears are reserved for Marie. For her, there seems to be no end in sight.

    Demonlover (2002)
    If you blinked, you missed Olivier Assayas’ Demonlover, a film that slipped under the radar of the movie-going public. Opening quietly in the U.S. in September of 2003 on 8 screens, Demonlover pulled in a meager $39 thousand dollars before disappearing completely from the scene. To watch the movie is to realize how sad this box-office tally truly is. Packed with thrills and sexual energy, Demonlover deserved much better.

    Diane de Monx (Connie Nielson) is a corporate spy posing as an executive for a large French company, where she uses her position to gather secrets for her corporation’s chief competitor. Through conniving and espionage, she arranges the theft of some important documents from her immediate superior, Karen (Dominique Reymond), which detail the company’s plan to merge with a Japanese animation studio that specializes in pornography. The documents are intercepted, and with Karen incapacitated as a result, Diane is appointed the enviable task of heading up the merger talks. But when a seedy American firm also enters the negotiations, Diane finds she must go deeper than she ever imagined into the world of pornography, including an impromptu visit to a sado-masochistic underworld that might destroy her in the end.

    What makes Demonlover so interesting is the well-established correlation it builds between big business and sexuality, where mergers and takeovers are little more than the corporate equivalent of physical rape. When the files she’s carrying are stolen, Karen tells her assistant, Elise (Chloe Sevigny) that she feels as if she’s been violated. It’s a feeling others will share before this film is over, yet, from a business angle, Demonlover takes the stance that end results justify any and all personal sacrifices. With pornography being such a huge cash generator, the corporate entity at the heart of Demonlover is ready to do whatever is necessary to get their piece of that multimillion-dollar pie. So, when Diane does descend into the dark recesses of violent sexuality, having already survived corporate backstabbing, deceit, even murder, the experience is little more than a natural extension of the world she already knows. In big business, money is the ultimate gratification, and executives are nothing more than the pimps, prostitutes and rapists struggling to get their hands on it.

    Demonlover hit me out of left field. Knowing so little about this film prior to seeing it, I was blindsided by both its engaging style and intensely dramatic story. While the vices of big business have been explored before in movies, I’ve never experienced a reaction quite the same as I did to this film. Demonlover is yet another of those discoveries that makes being a film fan so rewarding.