“But I don’t want comfort. I want God, I want poetry, I want real danger, I want freedom, I want goodness. I want sin.”
- Aldous Huxley (Brave New World)
Brave New World, the brilliant and eerily relevant 1932 dystopian novel by Aldous Huxley, has been adapted a few times in the past, most recently in a 1998 87-minute made-for-TV movie starring none other than the legendary Peter Gallagher and Leonard Nimoy. Obviously, it has never received a respectable adaptation (sorry, Pete, Lenny). Word has been rumbling around Hollywood for a while that Ridley Scott wants to take on an adaptation and io9 got the chance to talk to him the other day about how far along they are.
Ridley said that Leonardo DiCaprio’s production company approached him to do it and he was intrigued with the story, as Huxley’s vision was a somewhat prophetic of where we are today. But are they even close to finishing a script yet?
“No, no no we’re still struggling with that one,” Scott said. “I have 40 things on the go at once. But that’s a very important one. And sometimes, some surface faster than the others. It’s partly luck of the draw. Even with a good writer, he’ll do it and screw up. So then you go back to the table and start all over again, it’s hard. The hardest single thing is getting it on paper.”
Brutally honest, but especially with something of this scope, that is usually the way it is. This could be a project that goes through three or four or five writers before it is all said and done, especially if Ridley is not in a hurry to get to it with all of his other projects on his plate. He goes on the say that DiCaprio is “perfect for it,” although he doesn’t say whether he is referring to producing or starring – but I think he would be great to star as either Bernard Marx or John the Savage.
If you’re unfamiliar with the story, here’s a synopsis off Amazon: “Community, Identity, Stability” is the motto of Aldous Huxley’s utopian World State. Here everyone consumes daily grams of soma, to fight depression, babies are born in laboratories, and the most popular form of entertainment is a “Feelie,” a movie that stimulates the senses of sight, hearing, and touch. Though there is no violence and everyone is provided for, Bernard Marx feels something is missing and senses his relationship with a young women has the potential to be much more than the confines of their existence allow. Huxley foreshadowed many of the practices and gadgets we take for granted today – let’s hope the sterility and absence of individuality he predicted aren’t yet to come.”
Does anyone want to see this made or have we had our fill of these types of films, like the recent The Island?