Archive for the ‘Rep Theater’ Category

  • Rep Cinemagoing: Modern Times

    0

    The thing that makes me happiest in the world is seeing audiences respond to classic films with joy and wonder, and that’s exactly what I saw last week when Cinefamily screened Modern Times to a nearly full audience. First off, it’s awesome that 150 people will choose a Chaplin silent film over the hoards of other entertainment options in this city, but it’s proven to me again and again that Chaplin (or Keaton) will still pack them in at Cinefamily, as they run these films every year or so to delighted audiences. Last time they ran Modern Times, though, I think I wasn’t able to go. This time it coincided with my volunteering night, so once I finished taking tickets, seating people, and clearing up a minor popcorn vs gravity issue, I settled in just as the credits finished to watch my favorite Chaplin film with a wonderfully receptive audience.

    I’ve seen Modern Times probably five or six times, but never before with an audience, and it added an awful lot to the experience. The film itself is incredible, and falls squarely within my top twenty of all time. Chaplin’s tramp starts off as a cog in the machine (literally, at one point) of a steel factory, spending his days tightening bolts on an endless stream of conveyor-belt carried steel plates. Slowing down piles him into the workers further down the assembly line, and stopping (for lunch) puts him into spasms as his muscles try to continue the tightening motions. After being put into an automatic lunch machine to test it – with hilarious results – he ends up having a nervous breakdown, losing his job, getting arrested by accident, meeting up with an orphan waif from the docks, trying to find a job to support her and protect her from the child services authorities, etc.

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Fighting for 35mm…and Our Cinematic Heritage

    29

    There’s no doubt that the future of cinema is going to be digital rather than film (as a physical format). Theatres are converting to digital projection right and left, with fewer and fewer 35mm film prints struck all the time, and the major camera manufacturers are ceasing production of film cameras to focus solely on digital cameras instead. It’s where the demand is. But this shift to digital doesn’t only affect new films, which are likely to be shot, edited, and projected digitally, never spending any phase of their creation on physical film – it also affects older films, which were shot on 35mm and meant to be projected on 35mm. Many Hollywood studios have declared their intention to stop producing 35mm prints of older films for use in repertory cinemas, museums, film forums, universities, etc, instead presenting those films only in digital formats as well.

    On the one hand, it’s easy to see why this makes sense to them. Digital copies are much easier and cheaper to store and transfer to theatres than bulky 35mm film prints. And many people will argue that digital looks better anyway, or at least consumers won’t be able to tell the difference. I heartily disagree with that – I love the tactile, physical look that 35mm has vs. the sterility of digital. But my point of view is quickly labeled romantic and old-fashioned in a world where cinema is a business and 35mm is antiquated technology. To some degree, it is a romantic perspective. I certainly get a rush of emotion every time I walk into the Silent Movie Theatre and see the film canisters sitting there, ready to be lovingly threaded through the projector by the seasoned projectionist for the evening’s screening. I smile when I see the cigarette burns signalling a reel change. I feel a connection to other audiences when a print is flawed through its many uses in other cinemas, screened for other audiences in other places. But what do my emotions, certainly the emotions of a minority of cinemagoers, matter in this equation?

    I’m definitely not alone in my love for seeing films projected on 35mm (or 70mm or whatever format was originally used to shoot them) – Julia Marchese of Los Angeles’s New Beverly Cinema, one of the foremost repertory cinemas in the country and one that would certainly feel the loss of 35mm prints, has started an online petition to Fight for 35mm. It currently has nearly 6,000 signatures of a hoped-for 10,000. Here’s the bulk of her plea:

    I firmly believe that when you go out to the cinema, the film should be shown in 35mm. At the New Beverly, we have never been about making money – a double feature ticket costs only $8. We are passionate about cinema and film lovers. We still use a reel to reel projection system, and our projectionists care dearly about film, checking each print carefully before it screens and monitoring the film as it runs to ensure the best projection possible. With digital screenings, the projectionists will become obsolete and the film will be run by ushers pushing a button – they don’t ever have to even enter the theater.

    The human touch will be entirely taken away. The New Beverly Cinema tries our hardest to be a timeless establishment that represents the best that the art of cinema has to offer. We want to remain a haven where true film lovers can watch a film as it was meant to be seen – in 35mm. Revival houses perform an undeniable service to movie watchers – a chance to watch films with an audience that would otherwise only be available for home viewing. Film is meant to be a communal experience, and nothing can surpass watching a film with a receptive audience, in a cinema, projected from a film print.

    I feel very strongly about this issue and cannot stand idly by and let digital projection destroy the art that I live for. As one voice I cannot change the future, but hopefully if enough film lovers speak up, we can prove to the studios that repertory cinema is important and that we want 35mm to remain available to screen.

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Now Playing at the Row Three Rep: One Room Does It All

    4
    in_a_lonely_place.jpgwhat_ever_happened_to_baby_jane.jpg

    [Row Three programming if we owned a Rep Cinema]

    One Room Does It All

    Tape – 7:30pm
    Fermat’s Room – 9:15pm
    Exam – 11pm

    Sometimes you don’t need a lot of locations to make a movie. Often a handful or even just a single location suffices to sell the story at hand. All three of these films are set primarily within a single room, give or take a scene or two out with. The obvious choices would have been the likes of 12 Angry Men, Saw, Rear Window and Reservoir Dogs but I thought I’d highlight some perhaps lesser known (modern) films.

    Richard Linklater is a fairly prolific director, having made a film every 1-3 years throughout his career, and is most known for films like Dazed and Confused, Before Sunrise, Before Sunset and A Scanner Darkly. Tape is one of his lesser known films, despite starring a couple of (now) huge names. Set entirely within a motel room, it centers on Jon (Robert Sean Leonard) who visits his old friend Vince (Ethan Hawke) at his motel before the premiere of his film at a festival. To kill time the two get into often heated discussions about their friendship and their regrettable past actions. Uma Thurman joins the two of them later on to amp up the tension as Amy, a past girlfriend of Jon’s. A real gem filled with terrific performances, a great sense of realism in the conversations and a palpable urgency, helped not least by the fact that it’s shot in DV and done entirely in real-time.

    Fermat’s Room (or La habitación de Fermat, to use its original Spanish name) is one of those movies where you’re presented with a mysterious situation and that mystery unravels as it progresses. In this case it centers on an unknown person inviting a group of people to a secluded house far away from the city. Once they enter and end up in a main living room-type area the door’s lock shut and they soon learn they have to continually solve math puzzles and text the answer to a cell phone number before the timer runs out. Each time one of the timers counts down to zero before the puzzle is solved the walls of the room start to close in on them. Talk about a plot hook. There’s been an English-language remake in the development stage for a while (no wonder with a plot as good as that) but this Cube-esque mystery-thriller is well worth checking out.

    The last film of the night is also the most recent, the compelling single room mystery that is Exam. Eight total strangers are brought together by a mysterious job offer. They are sat down in a room with a desk and a piece of paper in front of them. An invigilator tells them the rules such as not leaving the room and whoever wins gets the job. The timer starts and the group is left to begin the exam, which consists of a single question. The trouble is when they turn over their papers they are completely blank. And the mystery begins. This is a sneaky, intriguing mystery-thriller with plenty of twists and turns to keep you guessing. You’ll be sure of a certain thing one minute but then something else will happen which will turn your suspicions elsewhere. And since each of the characters are so different from one another (each with their own morals and motivations) you can find at least one to identify with – “what would I do?” is a question that often runs through your mind. The inevitable twist ending perhaps doesn’t live up to what has come before but while you are being kept in the dark (sometimes quite literally) this is a very fun watch indeed.

  • Heavenly Creatures 15th Anniversary Re-Release (UK only)

    4

     
     

    Thanks to Andrew for bringing this item to my attention, even if it is a bit of a tease. To coincide with an upcoming 15th Anniversary Blu-Ray release of Heavenly Creatures, small British distributor Peccadillo Pictures is going to give it a limited theatrical re-release. Peter Jackson’s Oscar nominated departure from splatter comedies (Braindead, Bad Taste, Meet The Feebles) is likely the main reason (along with The Frighteners) why New Line Cinema gave him the massive, in budget and scope, Lord of the Rings project (after the Kiwi director campaigned for actively.) Of course, it being Kate Winslet’s film debut is also of interest to many fans and admirers of her work over the past decade and a half. The fact that she is an excellent and nuanced performer right out of the gate should come as no surprise. Here she plays one of two girls accused and convicted of patricide. Melanie Lynskey (Up in the Air, The Informant!) has the role of narrator Pauline Parker, from whose diary the film is adapted. The girls obsessive relationship around literature and popular culture in 1950s New Zealand is compelling stuff when combined with Jackson’s flair for whimsical (and gritty) visuals.

    Considering the similarly themed (and titled) The Lovely Bones which ended up more or less a popular and critical failure, it is safe to call Heavenly Creatures his best written film, but despite it being more of a drama, it doesn’t eschew his penchant for high-fantasy and big special effects, only they are used much more sparingly here. Coupled with some nice film and musical hommages, this makes for great viewing on the big screen, so you folks across the pond should head out to your cinema on September 12th if it is playing in your neighborhood. We’ll overlook the math on this announcement, considering the film original came out in 1994, perhaps it took it an additional two years to get to the UK while Miramax (at their peak in terms of indie prestige) in the US jumped on it pretty fast.

    On a side note, this film seems to be plagued with poor and half-assed DVD releases, I know my early Miramax release is possibly the worst looking film I have in my collection (inexcusable for such a handsomely shot picture) and while it has been out in Canada on Blu Ray for some time, apparently that release is pretty bare bones and in the wrong aspect ratio to boot. We will see if Peccadillo’s eventual release is done with as much TLC as them giving the film a theatrical repertory release.

    For much more on the film, you can go back into the MOVIE CLUB PODCAST archives for the Heavenly Creatures episode.

  • 8 Time-Travel-Tangents: Some Companion Films for SOURCE CODE

    5

    A rowdy Saturday night crowd, mostly in their early twenties, who showed all kinds of bad-movie-going-experience-warning-signs: Loud giggles and fidgeting, lots of cell phone usage, people constantly changing seats, etc. before the film was held in rapt attention once the story started to play out. In this day and age of uncouth cinema-etiquette, a talky bit metaphysical science fiction engaging the horde is not nothing! Duncan Jones’ ability to take the goofy ‘Quantum Leap’ type subject material and imbue it with a brains, a sense of homour and make the package an all around good time at the flickers made me realize how much I love the ‘sort-of-time-travel-sort-of-parallel-universe’ kind of film, and thus, why not outline a few fun companion pieces that could go on a double- or triple-bill with Source Code some time down the line. This is not a review of Duncan Jones’ new ‘quantum forensics’ thriller Source Code, a film I am only moments from returning from that is really quite spiffy, but sort of a Row Three Rep-tacular! If you were to have a festival of movies to watch along side Duncan Jones latest, I offer a few below. Apologies if the films are so modern, but this type of subject matter seems to be a product of the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. Although if you have a Howard Hawkes, Ernst Lubitsch, Fritz Lang or John Frankenheimer story that plays with consequence and Schrödinger’s cat, please let me know.

    1. Minority Report
     
     
    Here Samantha Morton is a person used as a machine in the future-crimes experimental program (not unlike Jake Gyllenhaal in the Source Code program) which brings the Patriot Act to its satirical end-game. Tom Cruise plays the damaged cop who is the ace-man for doing on the ground arrests of folks that are ‘about to do a crime’ before he comes up as the next future-criminal. Spielberg is an odd director to adapt Phillip K. Dick, and the film is wobbly some times fluctuating between cynical ironies and Indiana Jones set-pieces. It all works pretty well until the the wacky feel-good epilogue that undercuts any kind of logic or coherence.

    2. Donnie Darko
     
     
    Jake Gyllenhaal launched his A-List career with one of the new millenniums first ‘Tangent-Universe’ movies. A post-theatrical cult-crossover that acquired profundity by being obtuse (this is a clever way of me telling you to avoid the needlessly over-explained directors cut at all costs.) Disturbed teen has trouble with sleep walking and eventually finds out that the universe is ending on Halloween night. Angst-y encounters with authority figures, large talking rabbits and a would-be girlfriend (Jenna Malone) make Donnie Darko a sort of an unholy blend of John Hughes and Kurt Vonnegut, but someone is already sharpening their knife for that comparison. One wonders if Source Code is not a slicker, establishment-made bookend to Darko’s rough and tumble up-and-comer. Then again, Duncan Jones is only two films in and Moon was his own rough-and-tumble, yet slick and somehow humane coming-out party.

    3. Trancers
     
     
    This D-grade Terminator knock-off produced by Full Moon Entertainment (a company that specialized in decent D-grade entertainment) features a futuristic cop traveling back to 1985 by way of consciousness altering narcotics to possess one of his ancestors bodies for a time. He is going there/then to chase down his arch-nemesis, a super-psychic criminal named Whistler, and on the way he grows to love the 80s, fall in love with Helen Hunt (in an early role) and create a whole lot of paradox by trying to prevent a paradox, not that the filmmakers explore things too deeply, but it sure is fun to see Tim Thomerson get a rare starring role in a film.

    4. The Fountain
     
     
    Hugh Jackman and Rachel Weisz are destined to not be together in three different eras (or rather the present and the future and within a fictional short-story within the film.) A stylish, occasionally overcooked, and delightfully convoluted way to say, make the most of the time you have and stop worrying about what the future may bring. Or if you are a Beatles fan, ‘life is what happens when you’re busy making other plans.’ But come to think about it, it is kind of the same message that Source Code flirts with.

    5. Mr. Nobody
     
     
    Here is a film that plays out all of its tangent universes at the same time to visualize choice in a similar way to Source Code. But Mr. Nobody gussies it up even further with flowery cinematography and completely eschewing exposition by literally lecturing the details of the films premise by its lead character (Jared Leto.) Like The Fountain (see below), it mixes in a characters own series of short-stories to further confound, and its take on ‘time travel’ is decidedly backwards. Settling on that somewhere in all the possible worlds, there is probably one or two in which you don’t suffer too much, but there are far more shitty lives than good ones. I think people overlook the fact that although Mr. Nobody is a hodgepodge of other movie styles and conceits, it actually has a delightfully absurdist take on the universe, something that comes out of the wackiness and non-intuitive nature of Quantum Mechanics.

    6. The Adjustment Bureau
     
     
    Probably playing in an adjacent cinema to Source Code is another Philip K. Dick adaptation. It doesn’t quite have the momentum or elegance, but it does feature a valiant attempt by Matt Damon to forestall the inevitable (i.e. God and fate) by actually fulfilling the original inevitable. No the film is not as complicated as that last sentence, but it does cover more than a few ecclesiastical and existential hurdles along its merry way to an ending that is either sappily positive or subversively negative. Take your pick.

    7. Groundhog Day
     
     
    An obvious reference point for Source Code, as Bill Murray spends an endless cycle repetition (decades by one account on the internet) reliving one day in Punxsutawney to either see if the local groundhog will see his shadow or get into Andie MacDowell’s pants. Harold Ramis and company have a lot more fun with the concept than Duncan Jones, albeit Source Code has plenty of fun and there have been many serious papers written on Groundhog Day. Go Figure.

    8. Inception
     
     
    BWAAH! Yes, this film, albeit also quite recent, is on the list if only that one could live a life or three in the dilated time in a-dream-within-a-dream-within-a-dream. While Source Code, and many of the films in this list come with the message to savour each minute. The Nolan brothers indicate that the wells of the brain are deep enough to dwell between seconds if only you dream hard enough. It’s a wonderful idea that is only hinted at in the film, and seemingly outright rejected by those few with the opportunity to do so (Marion Cotillard and Ken Watanabe, for instance, are both happy to get out of that situation) although the whole film could possibly be Leonardo DiCaprio’s character opting to stay. Either way, much like Source Code, it gets at metaphysics by way of big-action-movie syntax. An unusual way to approach the subject.

  • Defending the Indefensible *TONIGHT* at Toronto Underground Cinema

    4

    Listen up Toronto! The fine folks who run Toronto’s newest repertory house, The Toronto Underground Cinema are kicking off a new series today called Defending The Indefensible. The basic premise is to bring in film writers, critics, bloggers and have them screen and defend a film that was roundly dismissed upon its commercial release. It may be on its way to a cult following or it simply may have been completely misunderstood upon the first critical pass. Consider it the hands-on version of Nathin Rabin’s My Year of Flops series over at the Onion A.V. Club. Their kick-off event is tonite at 7pm with Jean Pierre Jeunet’s Alien: Resurrection, to be followed immediately by Tom Green’s Freddy Got Fingered. These two films are of course highly relevant to our own Movie Club Podcast where we covered similar ground (Alien Quadrilogy Show, Freddy Got Fingered Show) but it is even more fun to do this live with an audience.

    The series continues throughout the year on one Friday each month with titles such as Speed Racer, Observe & Report, and MacGruber amoungst others. (Full disclosure, the organizers were gracious enough to contact me for one of the nights, and I suggested a Richard Kelly Double Bill: Southland Tales and Domino, but alas, print availability in Canada has hampered that at this point.)

    Complete Details and Schedule are tucked under the seat.

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Now Playing at the Row Three Rep: Washed Up Hollywood

    7
    in_a_lonely_place.jpgbad_and_the_beautiful.jpgwhat_ever_happened_to_baby_jane.jpg

    [Row Three programming if we owned a Rep Cinema]

    Washed Up Hollywood

    In a Lonely Place – 8:00pm
    The Bad and the Beautiful – 10:00pm
    What Ever Happened to Baby Jane – Midnight

    Hollywood has ever loved casting a cynical glance on itself, somehow managing to maintain its visage as the dream factory while also exposing the deep decay and corruption underneath. This surfaces especially in film noir, of which you could almost create a subgenre of “Hollywood Gothic.” All these films could fall under that subgenre, but they all also feature characters whose great success in show business has faded, leaving them in the unenviable position of trying to make a comeback against all odds. Sunset Boulevard is the obvious go-to film here, so I left it out. I’m ornery that way. The three films I have chosen depict a writer, a producer, and an actress all trying to reclaim their former glory while dealing with their own, sometimes severe, personal difficulties.

    in-a-lonely-place-24-4-10-kc.jpg

    Nicholas Ray’s In a Lonely Place gave Humphrey Bogart one of his best roles as troubled screenwriter Dixon Steele, who hasn’t written a hit film for several years. When his agent begs him to adapt a recent bestseller, Dix asks a coat check girl smitten with the book to come home with him and tell him about it – when she turns up dead after leaving his apartment, he’s the obvious suspect, and his history of short-temperedness and violence against previous girlfriends doesn’t do him any favors. But neighbor Laurel Gray (Gloria Grahame) gives him an alibi and they start a relationship that may save Dix both personally and professionally. He’s like a new man and starts writing a new screenplay, with a poetic touch in lines like “I was born when she kissed me, I died when she left me, I lived a few weeks while she loved me” that could apply as well to Dix and Laurel’s relationship as it does to Dix’s screenplay. But this is Hollywood Gothic, and that rarely turns out well for the main characters. When the murder investigation turns back around it sours both his blossoming career aspirations and his relationship with Laurel, leading to an end quite bleak for the time in which it was made. There’s so much to love and respect about this film – the career-topping performances by Bogart and Grahame, the complexity of their characters, many editing and story decisions that set this apart from its noir-esque siblings. It’s a heartbreaking movie, all the more so because we see what Dix and Laurel could have had, what his career and his life could have been with her at his side, but yet it all almost inevitably breaks down.

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Christopher Nolan’s Memento gets Micro Re-Release in Select Theatres, Feb. 17

    2

     
     

    Ten years after its theatrical debut, Christopher Nolan’s neo-noir thriller told in reverse, Memento is getting a celebratory ONE NIGHT ONLY re-release on February 17th, 2011. Screening in select digital cinemas across North America, these screenings will feature an exclusive Q&A with writer/director Christopher Nolan speaking with acclaimed filmmaker Guillermo Del Toro. Did you miss Memento when it debuted to an almost instant cult following upon its limited release? Here is your chance to check out a crisp HD version in the cinemas.

    Confirmed CITIES/THEATRES include:

    New York, NY City Cinemas
    Atlanta, GA Studio Movie Grill
    Boston, MA Nat’l Amusements
    Dallas, TX Studio Movie Grill
    Houston, TX Studio Movie Grill
    Los Angeles, CA Rave The Bridge
    San Diego, CA UltraStar Mission
    Washington DC Rave Fairfax Corner
    Toronto, ON Cineplex Varsity
    Vancouver, BC Cineplex Scotiabank Theatere

    More may be added, so you can check here if you are curious if your city has a screening.

  • Now Playing at the Row Three Rep: Women in a League of Evil (to Destroy Men)

    6

    [Row Three programming if we owned a Rep Cinema]

    Cult Women Conspiracies

    The Wicker Man (2006)
    Exodus (2007)
    The Dark Secrets of Harvest Home (1978)

    Believe it or not, it is quite difficult to find very many films with women en mass conspiring to emasculate men. Considering most films are written and directed by men, it is rather surprising that this theme does not pop up more often. Sure, there is the evil asian ghost with long hair, or the jilted psychotic ex-lover come back for revenge, but consider the number of movies about satanist cults and other underground Masonic-type boys clubs, and it is rather odd.

     

     

    The original Wicker Man (1973), considered by many (myself included) to be one of the great films of all time. An epic mash of folklore, mystery, religious ideology, music, suspense and finally horror, mainly dealt with Christianity and Paganism and how the two clash when a Scottish cop locks ideology with the local lord. The film, like many great horror films lately, was destined for a remake. The bafflingly bad result did terrible at the theatre, being released at the career nadir of one Nicholas Cage (and a downward slide for its director, former playwright Neil LaBute who achieved notoriety and success with the one-two punch of In the Company of Men and Your Friends and Neighbors, films that took the battle of the genders to interesting places.) The remake drops the religion angle, and takes the paganism rather out out context to deliver a daffy Nic Cage vs. Women tale. There is a famous you-tube clip consisting of a collection of cold-cocks to the face and Sgt. Cage brandishing large handguns to the various female denizens of an island off the coast of Portland, who are practicing old century ways to keep their bees producing boutique grade honey. That Cage’s hangdog short-tempered investigator was dumped and abandoned by his fiancee (who retreated back to this island, and shows up here as a would-be ally) is only icing on the cake. While nearly everyone embarrasses themselves in an exercise of camp-in-slow motion including Leelee Sobieski, Frances Conroy and Molly Parker. The iconic Ellen Burstyn (no stranger to Horror iconography, having starred in the biggest horror picture of all time, The Exorcist) gives a solid but wasted turn in the Christopher Lee role. Sure, the pretty cinematography (just outside of Vancouver) make this a fun one-off viewing, even while it is takes a large crap on the power of the original. In the strained effort to set it in the United States instead of Scotland, much of the plot detail and other cultural motivation is rendered rather incomprehensible and certainly out of any historical context. Then there is the 21st century addition of lot of bad CGI bees which I suppose make the scene compliment Cage’s ‘mega-acting’ well enough. The remake ends with a giggle, not the soul chilling fires of people certain in their beliefs. It is the best parody of the 1973 classic that could ever be made, and it does it with a stony-straight faced earnestness. Camp Classic!

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Now Playing at the Row Three Rep: The Revolutionary

    19

    *I had to repost this because the Wikileaks ‘hacktivists’ activity going on right now is as close to a global revolution as we have got lately, and this triple bill puts some of that spirit in context.

    [Row Three programming if we owned a Rep Cinema]


    The Revolutionary Triple Bill


    V for Vendetta – 1pm
    Hunger – 4pm
    Che (both parts) – 7pm

    When does a terrorist become a freedom fighter? How much would you sacrifice for a belief? How does the power of myth distort reality? This programme is about revolutionaries that live by a code as the world around them tires. We begin with fiction, a comic book dystopia in V for Vendetta. Out of the ensuing chaos of a plague-stricken England, an Orwellian police state forms, and as the populace resign themselves to their lot a revolutionary known only as V attempts to make everyone remember what happened on the 5th of November. When Vendetta originally came out, slotted as a summer blockbuster and the first big project associated with the Wachowski Brothers since The Matrix, it’s fair to say, and with no pun intended, it bombed. Taking from the densely political graphic novel and making something with as much levity as 1984, it disappointed the popcorn crowd, as it did me on the first viewing; on revisit, and in context of this triple bill, the potency of some of its ideas rise to the surface. Even this far after 9/11 the bite of Vendetta’s role reversal with the audience sympathizing with the terrorists is still there (in one scene V says blowing up a building is about destroying the symbol of power it represents). Vendetta satirizes the complacency of the modern world and the fascist undertones of the global village all from a particularly English perspective, which flows nicely into the otherwise stylistically diverging entry of this programme, Steve McQueen’s Hunger.
    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Now Playing at the Row Three Rep: The Art of Travel Triple Bill

    5

    [Row Three programming if we owned a rep cinema]

    The Art of Travel Triple Bill

    The Brothers Bloom – 5 pm
    What Time Is It There? – 7:15 pm
    Hotel Chevalier, followed by The Darjeeling Limited – 9:30 pm

    I love travel. There is nothing quite like the sensations of being immersed in an unfamiliar place, of learning to adapt to (or, at least, keep afloat within) a different culture, of making new discoveries and memories as you are carried along your journey. I believe the films selected for this lineup perfectly capture the experience of travel, each one focusing on different facets that, overall, comprise the cascade of impressions both positive and negative that are felt when you venture forth into the world, suitcase and camera in tow.

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Now Playing at the Row Three Rep: Mesmerizingly Weird Kid Films

    5
    5000fingers-poster.jpgNightofthehunterposter.jpgThenakedkissposter.jpg

    [Row Three programming if we owned a Rep Cinema]

    Mesmerizingly Weird Kid Films

    The 5000 Fingers of Dr. T – 5:15pm
    The Night of the Hunter – 7:00pm
    The Naked Kiss – 9:00pm

    Notice I didn’t actually say “kid’s films,” because only one of these is even remotely aimed at an audience of children. Rather, these are films that prominently feature children and are also downright strange, in wonderful stylized ways. They each also happen to have at least one deliciously unusual and somewhat creepy musical sequence, which I’d forgotten about until I was going after screencaps.

    5000fingers.jpg

    We’ll start off the night with an early showing of The 5000 Fingers of Dr. T, the only film written by Theodore Geisel, better known as Dr. Seuss. In this 1953 cult favorite, Bart is tormented by having to take piano lessons from the dictatorial Dr. Terwilliker, an activity he hates above everything else. Falling asleep at the piano one day, he imagines himself in Dr. T’s evil institute where he and 499 other boys have been enslaved to play the world’s largest piano. He’s got to navigate this surreal world, dodge Dr. T’s minions, and save his mother from Dr. T’s hypnotic influence. Oh, right, and there’s the single most bizarre musical sequence I’ve seen in pretty much any movie, with the inhabitants of Dr. T’s dungeons (basically anyone who plays any instrument other than a piano) putting on a hedonistic display of human/double-bass combos, harps that sprout out of the floor, and more. There’s plenty of cheese on hand, but some beautiful Seussian art direction and childlike charm make this the Dali-esque film you’ll be willing to let your young kids see. But you might want to send them home before the rest of the bill, because it gets a little more disturbing from here on out.

    » Read the rest of the entry..

Page 1 of 212»