Archive for the ‘Marathons’ Category

  • Modern Times (1936)

    1

    [Chris Edwards, who writes extensively about silent films on his blog, Silent Volume, has written the following review of Modern Times. Anyone else wishing to have their marathon reviews published on Row Three may kindly send them my way for consideration. To see the full programme click on the Dirty Thirties header image above.]

    Charlie Chaplin was the Tramp in almost all his films, so all his films, in some way, dealt with want. His first Depression-era movie, City Lights (1931), was a melodrama; a love story that depended on the poverty of its two leads to set up the gags. It could have been set in 1900 as easily as 1931. But his second, Modern Times (1936) does not present a poor man so much as a poor society, and the gags rely not on the Tramp’s poverty, but on the root cause of everyone else’s.

    Chaplin blamed mechanization. He wasn’t a Luddite; he just felt that efficiency, if made an end unto itself, would place the machine above the worker. So it is in Modern Times. The Tramp is now A Factory Worker—the ‘nut tightener’ on a far-too-rapid assembly line, wielding a pair of wrenches on an ever-continuing row of metal plates. The plates pass him, then two other workers, then disappear into a tunnel. When his break begins, he walks away, still jerking with the same motions as before, trying to tighten anything nut-like around him, including the buttons on a woman’s blouse.

    Audiences must have felt uneasy seeing the Tramp—then the most famous character in the world—so close to collapse. He would have reminded them of simpler and happier times. In fact, the whole film would have. It’s a (mostly) silent movie produced well into the sound era, and it’s loaded with references to silent comedy and action pictures. But modernity perverts it all.

    The Tramp, who once found the most inventive ways to steal a snack, is now strapped into a chair before a revolving set of dinner plates and metal arms that stuff processed food down his throat. He dangles from a huge hook, like Douglas Fairbanks brandishing his sword, only now it’s an oilcan. He runs from a cop, but stops to punch his timecard. He ends up in a mental hospital.

    He gets out. Only steps from the hospital, the Tramp sees a red flag fall off the back of a pickup truck. He picks up the flag and inadvertently triggers a Communist march, then a police crackdown, followed by his incarceration.

    Back on the street, the Tramp collides with a young woman (Paulette Goddard), escaping a bakery with her stolen dinner. Goddard is ‘The Gamin’ (gamine, or street urchin); in this case, the eldest sister of a family of girls, without a mother when the movie begins and without a father after a food riot leaves him shot. The Gamin is swift, smart and wickedly sexy, but she’s too desperate to avoid getting caught. » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Miller’s Crossing: What’s the Rumpus?

    93

    Miller’s Crossing

    (2/5)

    The reputation of Miller’s Crossing precedes it here on Row Three where virtually everything the Coen Brothers do is canonized as quip-worthy gold. This marathon is an curious endurance test for me on the one hand as I am seeing films by directors that I am, shall we say, less enthusiastic about than most, yet for each, whether Sam Mendes, Brian DePalma, Steven Soderbergh, or the Coen Brothers, I would like nothing more than to share in the chorus of adulation. While these directors have won me over on occasion, their careers are spotty at best and not nearly as unblemished as others here attest to in their regular worship sessions.

    With the exception of Intolerable Cruelty, I have seen every Coen Brothers film. Of these thirteen films, maybe five of them have I truly enjoyed. The Coens are masters of composition and visual flare, and as screenwriters they are wry and intelligent wordsmiths. I don’t question their talents in these regards so much as I question the underlying motivations they are employed towards. Far too often the matters of storytelling take a secondary importance to the primary interest in stylistic wit. Films such as Fargo, No Country for Old Men and Blood Simple are rare examples of the directors using proper restraint both in their scripts and in their visual styles to best serve the stories and themes. More often than not, the conceit of reappropriating cinematic conventions is foremost on their minds, the style determining the story. More than even Tarantino, the repurposing demagogue of modern cinema, the Coen Brothers have made their films more about film history than life as it is lived. Like Tarantino, their saving grace is that they are funny, and the pastiche rifts they employ do amount to laughs, when laughs are what is intended.

    Still, that they sample legendary filmmakers and iconic films does not by association make them a part of that league of talent, and yet there seems to be a consensus that because their films take on the accoutrements of greatness they too must be great. There is a fundamental difference between stories that have something to say about the world and stories that cannot look beyond their own stylistic myopia. There is a difference between David Bowie and Vanilla Ice, though they may use the same basic sounds, the act of sampling is by and large an inferior form of art-making. Yes all art is fundamentally theft, but there needs to be something on your mind outside of the theft that justifies its creation, and with the Coen Brothers, more often than not, I don’t see anything outside of the movie conventions they wish to repurpose, I don’t see the original germ of a story that the style is in service of.

    Albert Finney Miller's Crossing

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • The Untouchables

    14

    (4/5)

    This first film of the marathon sets us amidst the gang warfare of prohibition-era Chicago in what is perhaps one of the most widely seen movies on our list: Brian DePalma’s The Untouchables. If you are in your thirties or older you more than likely saw The Untouchables when it came out in 1987, it was to the 80′s what Pulp Fiction was to the 90′s, a phenomenon that a wide segment of the film-going public flocked to see. An update of the classic television serial starring Robert Stack, DePalma’s sentimental depiction of hard-boiled crime fighters pits Inspector Elliot Ness (Kevin Costner) and his Prohibition Bureau team against the iconic gangster, Al Capone (Robert DeNiro). With the help of a wizened mentor played by Sean Connery, Ness and his team of underdogs seek to take down Capone ‘the Chicago way’, invoking an all out war between factions. My first impressions of the film in 1987 were admittedly superficial and unburdened by an awareness of craft. To me it was not a DePalma film operating in emulation of previous conventions, but an exciting action caper playing out childhood hero fantasies between cops and robbers.

    Al Capone

    Revisiting the film many decades later, my impressions of the film have unavoidably changed and as much as I can appreciate the potboiler theatrics of it, I see it now through a different lens. This second viewing, I watched the movie on blu-ray and the heavy use of artificial lighting and rich historical detail gleam in that peculiar way that blu-ray allows and that aesthetic works perfectly with The Untouchables as it is a very flashy and at times unnatural amplification of the reality it depicts. This movie is as much about texture and colour as it is about anything else, it would seem there isn’t a decorative cornice or rain-soaked alleyway unexplored in Chicago, its all up there like a sumptuous display of excess. This rendering of the thirties is a strange hybrid that both exists in a real location, filmed onsite in Chicago, but is lit as if fabricated on a Hollywood back lot, with sharp profile lighting and splashes of colour that drain many of the cityscapes of their reality. David Mamet’s screenplay too keeps the beats and dialogue locked into a hard-boiled cadence that echoes the familiar Hollywood Gangster classics that it in part clearly emulates. The film is bloody and at times lingers on the consequences of violence in a way distinct from the play-violence of its predecessors, but it is still very much a pantomime at heart (i.e., the classic long death sequence of Connery’s Malone as he crawls along the floor). » Read the rest of the entry..

  • The Dirty Thirties Movie Marathon

    12



    FEATURING:
    John Ford. Frank Capra. Howard Hawks. Sergio Leone. The Coen Brothers.
    Hal Ashby. Steven Soderbergh.
    Sydney Pollack. Preston Sturges.
    Robert Altman. Sam Mendes.
    Charlie Chaplin. Michael Mann.
    Brian DePalma.

    Hungry and spent during the Dirty Thirties: this is an American story. A stetson hat, a cup of joe, the dust bowl and the stock market crash, the crooked boxer, the tommy gun gangster, everywhere poverty and screwball comedies, the prohibition, the Great Depression, the chain gangs and bluegrass twang. This era of American history is the subject of R3′s first movie marathon. From now until the end of July, contributing writers of Row Three will watch and review films that evoke the Dirty Thirties. Part of this is a lead up to Michael Mann’s Public Enemies (July 1st) which will also be reviewed as part of the marathon.

    Join In:

    Anyone wishing to participate in the marathon can of course watch the films and comment on the posts, or if inclined contribute reviews (films related to the theme beyond our scope are fine too). What ultimately gets published will be left up to my discretion, but at the very least we will add a link to your review on this programme page, which will collect together all of the reviews, complete with star ratings. The following 22 films are considered the canon within this marathon, however, if there are films that have been missed you feel should be added, I am happy to consider additions. The films need not be watched in a particular sequence, watch what you can get when you can get it. Below you will find links to places to either rent or catch the films on television, and if anything has been missed, please alert me to the fact and I will revise. Finally, a reminder to follow us on Twitter for our random musings on the films we are watching.

    The Programme

    PUBLIC ENEMIES
    2009, Michael Mann
    The Feds try to take down notorious American gangsters John Dillinger, Baby Face Nelson and Pretty Boy Floyd during a booming crime wave in the 1930s.(courtesy of IMDb)

    In Theaters July 1st
    (Kurt Halfyard’s Review) (4/5)



    KING OF THE HILL
    1993, Steven Soderbergh
    A young boy struggles on his own in a run-down motel after his parents and younger brother are separated from him in 1930s Depression-era Midwest.(courtesy of IMDb)



    MR DEEDS GOES TO TOWN
    1936, Frank Capra
    Longfellow Deeds, a simple-hearted Vermont tuba player, inherits a fortune and has to contend with opportunist city slickers.(courtesy of IMDb)

    Starring: Gary Cooper, Jean Arthur.
    it!
    it!
    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Exploitation Marathon: Humanoids from the Deep (1980)

    4

    We all have our guilty pleasures. I know I have a good number of them. For instance, I’ve been known, on occasion, to kick back to the gentle harmonies of Mr. Barry Manilow. Also, whenever I’m channel surfing and happen upon The Brady Bunch, I immediately stop my search. Well, it looks as if I now have another guilty pleasure to add to the list: the Roger Corman’-produced 1980 horror fest, Humanoids from the Deep. It’s shabby, and more than a bit rough around the edges, yet I really got a kick out of it.

    All hell’s broken loose in the normally peaceful fishing village of Noyo, where a mysterious rash of violence is paralyzing the community. Long-time resident Jim Hill (Doug McClure) sets out to investigate the cause, while the town’s most prestigious businessman, Hank Slattery (Vic Morrow) believes he already knows what’s happening, laying the blame for the recent violence at the feet of the local Native American population, including Hill’s good friend, Johnny Eagle (Anthony Penya). Unbeknownst to them all, however, is that the true source of the hysteria is a mass of mutated sea monsters that have swarmed into the nearby river system. But these creatures, the result of a failed scientific experiment performed on salmon, are interested in more than just mass destruction; they’re also after the female population of Noyo, not to kill or eat them, but to use them as mates.

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Exploitation Marathon: Cannibal Apocalypse (1980)

    3

    It was April of 2007, right before the release of the Rodriguez/Tarantino double-team known as Grindhouse, that I decided my knowledge of exploitation cinema was not all it should be. By that time, I’d seen a number of Pam Grier’s early films, and even had a few Roger Corman DVDs in my collection, yet overall my experience with this particular slice of movie history was pretty dismal, to say the least. So, in an effort to give myself a ‘crash course’ in Exploitation cinema, I did a little on-line research, reserved a few DVDs through Netflix and Blockbuster, and spent an entire weekend watching nothing but the best that the Grind Houses of yesteryear had to offer.

    The final tally was 12 films in 2 days, and many of the movies I watched that weekend, such as Vanishing Point and the first two entries in the Lone Wolf and Cub series (Sword of Vengeance and Baby Cart at the River Styx), impressed me so much that they’ve since made their way into my ever-growing DVD library. It was a fun weekend, one I won’t soon forget.

    In fact, it was so much fun that I’ve decided to turn it into a yearly happening. I’ve just now put the wraps on my 2nd Annual Exploitation Weekend, squeezing in another 12 films in a two-day period. As with last year, I had one hell of a good time.

    Over the course of the next several weeks, I’ll be writing up reviews for some of the movies that made up this 2nd Annual Exploitation Film Festival (any suggestions for a better title would be greatly appreciated). The first in the series is Antonio Margheriti’s 1980 horror film, Cannibal Apocalypse, one of two cannibal-themed movies, along with Cannibal Holocaust, in this year’s line-up. Yet, despite the similarities in their titles, each film takes an entirely different approach to the subject at hand: where Cannibal Holocaust presents dining on human flesh as a way of life for a primitive culture, Cannibal Apocalypse gives us cannibalism as a disease, transmitted from one living creature to another in much the same manner as rabies.

    » Read the rest of the entry..

Page 5 of 5«12345