Archive for the ‘General Ramblings’ Category

  • Is the Theatre Cam Youtube look an aesthetic for David Fincher and Company?

    17

     

    Maybe I was too fast to judge the ‘creativeness’ of this teaser for David Fincher’s upcoming The Girl with a Dragon Tattoo. My original thought was that a simple, ‘lets set some images and type to a Reznor/KarenO cover of Led Zeppelin,’ was not a creative of a way to sell this movie considering David Fincher’s last film, The Social Network, put out one quality teaser after another. A friend, pointed out that this teaser may simply act as a way for David Fincher to announce that the director of Seven was back to make a grimy, feel-bad movie (the grimy large type says as much as the flesh and blood soaked imagery.) I am lead to believe that this played in front of The Hangover as a regular trailer, but online, the studio lawyers have not played the usual whack-a-mole in taking it down, leading me to believe for a time anyway, the mal-framed, slightly shaky look is actually a part of the trailer. If so, neato.

    Just a quick question out there in trailerland, (perhaps I should send this by to the fine folks at TrailersfromHell for their thoughts as well), do you think this look is intentional? it is one of the better theatre-cam trailers I have seen to date. And if so, is this the first time it has been done to promote a studio film?

    The full ‘Theater-Cam’ teaser is tucked under the seat.

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Blockbuster Canada Closing 146 Stores

    11

    I don’t think anyone could say that they didn’t see this coming. Blockbuster Canada is closing up 146 stores. Over the past few years, I have been hitting the rental shops up less and less. The only times I go to Blockbuster or Rogers (most of the small rental shops have already closed) has been to purchase a previously viewed disc or if my kid wants to watch some kids movie that is not on Netflix. I really do feel that while streaming services such as Netflix and the new Red Boxes haven’t helped Blockbuster to be a viable business it is the prices and the slowly shrinking selection that have kept me from really renting DVDs or Blu-Rays. When I can go to Walmart and buy a movie for just over the cost of a rental there is very little reason to rent that movie. Instead of trying to lower prices to make renting a more viable option they have kept their prices high. Why would I ever buy a Blu-Ray or DVD from them when they charge twice as much as everywhere else? Even the previously viewed movies aren’t really that much cheaper than buying a disc at the big box stores.

    The biggest downside of this story for me is losing the ability to browse DVDs in the older sections. I have found lots of cool movies that I would never have thought of renting before going in to the store but even that isn’t too big of a loss anymore with past selections shrinking and the growing reliance on new releases.

    Here is the list of closing stores across Canada. I’ll be checking out the store today to see what the closing out deals are like. While I’m doing that I’ll be mourning the loss of rental shops.

  • One Sentence “Stakeland” Review

    3

    Holy shit; that was Kelly McGillis!?

     

    (pssst, here is Kurt’s longer review)

  • Trailer: Dennis Farina stars in THE LAST RITES OF JOE MAY

    0

     

    A first rate character actor gets to really strut his stuff in a downbeat hustler drama? That character actor being the great Dennis Farina. Sign me up. Throw in Gary Cole on support duty bonus! Bowing at the Tribeca Film Festival, The Last Rites of Joe May promises to be a solid and interesting film (see also Small Town Murder Songs with Peter Stormare.) Here, I dig the interesting way they’ve structured to the trailer with all those Ken Burns zooms and clean audio, it’s tangentially reminiscent modern La Jetee and I like it.

    Small-time Chicago hustler Joe May always felt like a great destiny awaited him, but with his health ailing and his age advancing, he’s never looked more like a bum. Broke and evicted, he’s taken in by a troubled young mother and daughter, in whom he finds one last shot to be a hero.

    The trailer is tucked under the seat.

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • A History of Title Design

    2

    I have no idea how I missed this because I visit The Art of the Title Sequence quite often, and I was casually covering SXSW at the time. I was even aware that TAotTS was doing something at the festival. But since I just found their succinct and toe-tapping montage/history lesson on the evolution of title design (that’d be opening credits to the rest of us folks) to be a marvel worthy of sharing, I will (even if I am a month late to the party.) They hit a lot of the great ones, and a lot of the turning points in history, and then throw in something like Carnivale or Zombieland. It appropriately ends on the most eye-melting sequence of all time, courtesy of Gaspar Noe. Enjoy.

  • Ryan Gosling and Steve Carrell: An Unlikely Duo

    1

    Perhaps they are an unlikely duo, but Ryan Gosling and Steve Carrell have teamed up for a romantic dramedy that is set for release on July 29th of this summer. The film is Crazy, Stupid, Love and the trailer is anything but inspiring – although not particularly bad either, mostly because it highlights a cast that also includes Emma Stone, Marisa Tomei, Julianne Moore, and Kevin Bacon.

    It’s directed by the duo who brought us I Love You Philip Morris and written by a man who has the likes of Cars, Bolt, and Tangled on his resume, so with all of this talent, one can’t help but think there will be (or at least should be) more to this than the trailer implies. I am sticking to that assumption and am just going to go into the theaters assuming that this will be a decent enough movie to take the ladyfriend to see during the midst of summer blockbuster season.

    Your thoughts?

  • 8 Time-Travel-Tangents: Some Companion Films for SOURCE CODE

    5

    A rowdy Saturday night crowd, mostly in their early twenties, who showed all kinds of bad-movie-going-experience-warning-signs: Loud giggles and fidgeting, lots of cell phone usage, people constantly changing seats, etc. before the film was held in rapt attention once the story started to play out. In this day and age of uncouth cinema-etiquette, a talky bit metaphysical science fiction engaging the horde is not nothing! Duncan Jones’ ability to take the goofy ‘Quantum Leap’ type subject material and imbue it with a brains, a sense of homour and make the package an all around good time at the flickers made me realize how much I love the ‘sort-of-time-travel-sort-of-parallel-universe’ kind of film, and thus, why not outline a few fun companion pieces that could go on a double- or triple-bill with Source Code some time down the line. This is not a review of Duncan Jones’ new ‘quantum forensics’ thriller Source Code, a film I am only moments from returning from that is really quite spiffy, but sort of a Row Three Rep-tacular! If you were to have a festival of movies to watch along side Duncan Jones latest, I offer a few below. Apologies if the films are so modern, but this type of subject matter seems to be a product of the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. Although if you have a Howard Hawkes, Ernst Lubitsch, Fritz Lang or John Frankenheimer story that plays with consequence and Schrödinger’s cat, please let me know.

    1. Minority Report
     
     
    Here Samantha Morton is a person used as a machine in the future-crimes experimental program (not unlike Jake Gyllenhaal in the Source Code program) which brings the Patriot Act to its satirical end-game. Tom Cruise plays the damaged cop who is the ace-man for doing on the ground arrests of folks that are ‘about to do a crime’ before he comes up as the next future-criminal. Spielberg is an odd director to adapt Phillip K. Dick, and the film is wobbly some times fluctuating between cynical ironies and Indiana Jones set-pieces. It all works pretty well until the the wacky feel-good epilogue that undercuts any kind of logic or coherence.

    2. Donnie Darko
     
     
    Jake Gyllenhaal launched his A-List career with one of the new millenniums first ‘Tangent-Universe’ movies. A post-theatrical cult-crossover that acquired profundity by being obtuse (this is a clever way of me telling you to avoid the needlessly over-explained directors cut at all costs.) Disturbed teen has trouble with sleep walking and eventually finds out that the universe is ending on Halloween night. Angst-y encounters with authority figures, large talking rabbits and a would-be girlfriend (Jenna Malone) make Donnie Darko a sort of an unholy blend of John Hughes and Kurt Vonnegut, but someone is already sharpening their knife for that comparison. One wonders if Source Code is not a slicker, establishment-made bookend to Darko’s rough and tumble up-and-comer. Then again, Duncan Jones is only two films in and Moon was his own rough-and-tumble, yet slick and somehow humane coming-out party.

    3. Trancers
     
     
    This D-grade Terminator knock-off produced by Full Moon Entertainment (a company that specialized in decent D-grade entertainment) features a futuristic cop traveling back to 1985 by way of consciousness altering narcotics to possess one of his ancestors bodies for a time. He is going there/then to chase down his arch-nemesis, a super-psychic criminal named Whistler, and on the way he grows to love the 80s, fall in love with Helen Hunt (in an early role) and create a whole lot of paradox by trying to prevent a paradox, not that the filmmakers explore things too deeply, but it sure is fun to see Tim Thomerson get a rare starring role in a film.

    4. The Fountain
     
     
    Hugh Jackman and Rachel Weisz are destined to not be together in three different eras (or rather the present and the future and within a fictional short-story within the film.) A stylish, occasionally overcooked, and delightfully convoluted way to say, make the most of the time you have and stop worrying about what the future may bring. Or if you are a Beatles fan, ‘life is what happens when you’re busy making other plans.’ But come to think about it, it is kind of the same message that Source Code flirts with.

    5. Mr. Nobody
     
     
    Here is a film that plays out all of its tangent universes at the same time to visualize choice in a similar way to Source Code. But Mr. Nobody gussies it up even further with flowery cinematography and completely eschewing exposition by literally lecturing the details of the films premise by its lead character (Jared Leto.) Like The Fountain (see below), it mixes in a characters own series of short-stories to further confound, and its take on ‘time travel’ is decidedly backwards. Settling on that somewhere in all the possible worlds, there is probably one or two in which you don’t suffer too much, but there are far more shitty lives than good ones. I think people overlook the fact that although Mr. Nobody is a hodgepodge of other movie styles and conceits, it actually has a delightfully absurdist take on the universe, something that comes out of the wackiness and non-intuitive nature of Quantum Mechanics.

    6. The Adjustment Bureau
     
     
    Probably playing in an adjacent cinema to Source Code is another Philip K. Dick adaptation. It doesn’t quite have the momentum or elegance, but it does feature a valiant attempt by Matt Damon to forestall the inevitable (i.e. God and fate) by actually fulfilling the original inevitable. No the film is not as complicated as that last sentence, but it does cover more than a few ecclesiastical and existential hurdles along its merry way to an ending that is either sappily positive or subversively negative. Take your pick.

    7. Groundhog Day
     
     
    An obvious reference point for Source Code, as Bill Murray spends an endless cycle repetition (decades by one account on the internet) reliving one day in Punxsutawney to either see if the local groundhog will see his shadow or get into Andie MacDowell’s pants. Harold Ramis and company have a lot more fun with the concept than Duncan Jones, albeit Source Code has plenty of fun and there have been many serious papers written on Groundhog Day. Go Figure.

    8. Inception
     
     
    BWAAH! Yes, this film, albeit also quite recent, is on the list if only that one could live a life or three in the dilated time in a-dream-within-a-dream-within-a-dream. While Source Code, and many of the films in this list come with the message to savour each minute. The Nolan brothers indicate that the wells of the brain are deep enough to dwell between seconds if only you dream hard enough. It’s a wonderful idea that is only hinted at in the film, and seemingly outright rejected by those few with the opportunity to do so (Marion Cotillard and Ken Watanabe, for instance, are both happy to get out of that situation) although the whole film could possibly be Leonardo DiCaprio’s character opting to stay. Either way, much like Source Code, it gets at metaphysics by way of big-action-movie syntax. An unusual way to approach the subject.

  • Is Pixar Finally Preparing to Jump a Giant Shark?

    2

     
    Having not yet seen Cars 2, it’s impossible to say unequivocally that the Pixar juggernaut is about to have its first failure; at least critically speaking. But if any of the marketing thus far is to be trusted, one might surmise that not only does Cars Part Deux look not very good, it looks downright embarrassingly terrible.

    It’s a pretty sure thing that the movie is going to make money. Cars is probably Pixar’s biggest money maker if you take into consideration merchandising. Kids seem to not be able to get enough and I’m sure they’re frothing at the mouth for more Lightning McQueen and his buddy Mater. The rest of us? Even the lovers of the original Cars, such as myself, are absolutely dreading the day and have thought the notion of a sequel a bad idea. It may end up working out; time will tell. But nonetheless, with the originality and creativity Pixar studios has shown us in the past, I can’t help but think a sequel to an already less-than-well-received feature seems at the very least to be lazy and unimaginative. A cash grab if you will. Still, knowing the kinds of things Pixar is capable of, we’ve yet to see them misstep and I still remain cautiously optimistic.

    I’ll see Cars 2 with interest and hopefulness but as the Pixar sequel train keeps chugging along (after Toys and Cars), word has been floating around for a while now that there would be a Monsters, Inc. sequel in store for us as well – albeit with a couple of new properties thrown in between. Today I learn (and it has been confirmed by Disney/Pixar) that this new Monsters will in fact be what has become known as a prequel: Monsters University. In which Mike and Sully meet up in college, initially hate each other and then learn to be friends. Being that Monsters, Inc. is still my personal favorite of the Pixar filmography, I feel it’s stands its own perfectly and shouldn’t be touched. To make the idea potentially even worse, nothing has been confirmed about John Goodman and Bill Crystal reprising the use of their voices for our two main protagonists. Remember Dumb and Dumberer?

    With other animation studios hot on the heels of the Pixar machine with films such as ILM’s Rango and Dreamworks’ How to Train Your Dragon, showing huge profit margins as well dazzling visual and critical and audience adoration, it’s going to be the studio that has the highest levels of ingenuity, foresight and artfulness that comes out as the leader in today’s animation. With Pixar seemingly taking the easy way out with their next couple of ventures, I can’t help but wonder if the steam has finally been exhausted from this boiling kettle known as Pixar.

  • Rank ‘em: Westerns

    14

    We haven’t done a Rank ‘em in ages (it has been over a year, actually), so it is about time that we bring them back. Fun, superficial, and completely pointless – we always enjoy the banter that comes with trying to justify some sort of top ten list and then arguing about our opinions with others. With my recent re-watch of True Grit, what a better topic to cover than westerns?

    Below is my list, based on my current mood, which I will surely be tempted to change in five minutes times. Be sure to share your own and feel free to tear into everyone else’s.

    10. The Gunfighter (Henry King, 1950)
    9. The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford (Andrew Dominik, 2007)
    8. The Searchers (John Ford, 1956)
    7. The Naked Spur (Anthony Mann, 1953)
    6. The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance (John Ford, 1968)
    5. The Outlaw Josey Wales (Clint Eastwood, 1976)
    4. The Proposition (John Hillcoat, 2005)
    3. The Great Silence (Sergio Corbucci, 1968)
    2. The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly (Sergio Leone, 1966)
    1. Once Upon a Time in the West (Sergio Leone, 1968)

    Click here for previous Rank ‘Ems!

  • Charlie Chaplin continues to be relevant.

    5

    While most of our political debate in the third row end up with fisticuffs and na-na-na-na-boo-boo name calling, if this ignites another political debate, so be it. Here is an absolutely beautiful and relevant video that mashes the always relevant speech from Charlie Chaplin’s The Great Dictator with video and images from the protests and revolutions going on throughout the world.

    Viva La Resistance!

  • A Film’s “Intent” and “Valid” Film Criticism

    46

    I‘m not a film critic. Yes, I write some reviews and have a weekly show in which I sit around and bullshit with my friends about newly released film. In that sense sure, I guess I am a critic. But in that sense isn’t everyone a critic of any form of art or experience they have that they talk about? What I mean is that I’m not paid for what I do. It’s not a career (obviously). I didn’t go to film school and I don’t have a degree in journalism or broadcasting. I’m just a dude with an opinion in which the 21st century allows me to share that opinion with the masses.

    So I think it’s time to address something that’s been bugging me for quite some time; an accusation that has been tossed around on our Cinecast (and others) far too often (of which I admit I am equally guilty). This notion that you’re “reviewing the movie not for what it is but what you wanted it to be.” I think that statement can careen down a real slippery slope and in most cases (not all) is totally invalid. Can’t you throw that accusation at anyone for just about any criticism of any movie? Our recent discussion of Rango has spurred these thoughts.

    If someone were to say they didn’t like Speed Racer because the dialogue is terrible, I don’t think it’s fair to say, “well that’s just not what the movie was aiming for.” Well maybe not, but that doesn’t mean it’s an invalid criticism. The dialogue is pretty terrible in that movie. It’s hackneyed, elementary and corny. Sure it may be reminiscent of the original animated television show and sure that may be what the producers intended but that doesn’t mean someone has to like it or that it couldn’t have been done better. I personally happen to like Speed Racer quite a bit but I wouldn’t argue with anyone who walks out of the screening and says, “man I just don’t think I could’ve taken one more second of Susan Sarandon’s one dimensional character and her campy acting!” That’s an absolutely fair comment to make.

    So yes, that person wanted that movie to be something different. In essence, any review out there that is negative of something is essentially saying just that isn’t it? If the film had done something just a little bit different it might be more positive looking in that particular “critic’s” viewpoint.
    » Read the rest of the entry..

Page 5 of 44« First...«34567»102030...Last »