Archive for the ‘General Ramblings’ Category

  • Gladiator: An Epic Film Review

    0

    Ridley Scott’s Gladiator roared onto the silver screen in 2000. It was an instant, overblown, hysterical, factually ambivalent in the finest tradition of historical epics success and went on to scoop up not one, but five Oscars.

    The secret of its success is legion (ha… see what we did there?) and can primarily be boiled down to Scott’s fearless return to the Roman epic. Movie lovers hadn’t seen anything quite like this since Kubrick’s equally epic Spartacus way back in 1960. Ridley Scott pulled all of his movie making brilliance into one brave move of seriously going for it with the pomp, with the visceral, bloody fighting scenes, with the hero against all odds story arc – and it worked beautifully.

    Russell Crowe puts in the performance of his career (and I think we’re pretty much able to say that from our vantage point in 2013 that this really was the performance of his career – notwithstanding A Beautiful Mind) as Maximus, the Roman general who is loyal to his Emperor Marcus Aurelius (played with ineffable charm by Richard Harris). Crowe is in fine, muscular fettel as he shows off those calves in Roman sandals. The film has a classic old Hollywood feel – the story of the good guy under duress, the villains speaking with definite British accents and the Caesar family depicted as twisted freaks. It’s a return to old cinema form, with the added bonus of epic scale and CGI.

    At the start of the film, Maximus leads an army and defeats some dodgy looking barbarians and for his efforts is made the Protectorate of Rome by the Emperor – much to the chagrin of the Emperor’s scheming son Commodus. When Commodus becomes Emperor he seizes the chance to have Maximus despatched, but he escapes this fate only to get home and find that his wife and children have been killed. He is distraught with grief and is captured by slave traders who make him a gladiator – perfect to enact some revenge.

    So the plot couldn’t be called original, by any stretch of the imagination. But when it’s been done with such style and panache, the story doesn’t need to be wildly original. The action sequences are totally gripping and the entire ambience of a Rome on the verge of a fall is tangible. CGI comes into play and works really well, as the Colosseum is recreated before our eyes. The effects also come in when it came to recreating the late, great Ollie Reed who died part way through filming. What remains of his actual performance shows that Gladiator marked a real return to form for this truly great actor – a fitting legacy to a hellraiser’s career.

    It’s the visceral nature of the film that really gets the viewer’s attention. It’s grand, it’s huge, it’s absorbing, it’s entertaining, it’s sad, it’s emotive – it’s everything you could wish for from a blockbuster. The story arc for Maximus follows that of hero to gladiator through slavery and shows his stoicism and true nature as he fights back against the slings and arrows thrown at him by Phoenix’s twisted Emperor. Crowe makes this film in a way that he hasn’t managed to capture since and the film will stand the test of time in the same way as its closest cousin Spartacus.

    And Gladiator reawakened our lust for Roman epics, with 300 and the TV series “Spartacus” following in its wake, not to mention video games and even a gladiator slot machine online. As Maximus screamed to the masses: “Are you not entertained?” Yes thanks, we are.

  • Where Have All the Fathers Gone? Good Dads are Rare in Cinema

    18

    Fathers on film get short shrift as role models. This may be that movies, or rather screenplays need drama, and drama usually spells conflict. So if it is a movie where fatherhood is a theme, Dad is portrayed as either clueless (The Ice Storm, Back To The Future, disengaged (The Incredibles) or overprotective (Finding Nemo), faltering morally (The Bicycle Thief, Catch Me If You Can), generally unsupportive or aware of who their child actually is (C.R.A.Z.Y., Paranorman, How To Train Your Dragon, The Little Mermaid, Fantastic Mr. Fox, Brave, The Croods…basically most modern American animated movies), dangerously obsessive (The Mosquito Coast), violent and abusive (The Shining, Precious, The War Zone), or simply abandon the household all together (Close Encounters of the Third Kind). Perhaps the worst ever is Daniel Plainview. As essayed by Daniel Day Lewis in There Will Be Blood, he is a borderline sociopath who raises his boy as a cute, therefore effective, prop for his unfettered capitalistic ambitions and all but abandons him -twice- when that purpose is served.

    Often when the dad is an encouraging, loving role-model, they exist only in memory (see Contact, below) or are eliminated after first act of the film (Leto Atreides in Dune, The Magistrate in Sansho The Bailiff, Mustafa in The Lion King). Even more often, the best dads seen on film are surrogate fathers rather than biological ones: Pa Kent in Superman, Ben Parker in Spiderman, John Hurt in Hellboy (if comics are your thing) or the kindly projectionist in Cinema Paradiso, Robin Williams in (take your pick) Dead Poets Society or Good Will Hunting, Tom Hanks in Catch Me If You Can, and of course Bilbo Baggins to his nephew Frodo in Lord of the Rings.

    A good father increases his child’s wonder and engagement with the world, provides a safe-haven for health of spirit and body, and provides the toolset for his child to go out in the world. He offers a sense or humour, fair and calm evaluation of situations both good and bad, and hopefully a little dignity in how one goes about their business. Looking around the web amongst the terribly repetitive ‘Best of’ kind of lists for movie dads, not only do we see a scarcity of truly good paternal role models, but those cobbling together these things favour the fathers that either drowning in their good intentions with no clue at what to do, as in the Vacation films or are cloyingly overbearing as in either version of the Father of the Bride, or they choose the unending tirades of violence and revenge – take your pick: Kick-Ass (Nic Cage), Taken (Liam Neeson), The Godfather (Marlon Brando), Die Hard (Bruce Willis), Hanna (Eric Bana), In The Bedroom (Tom Wiklinson), Death Wish (Charles Bronson), Road To Perdition (Tom Hanks). These are films that showcase parenting as a means for their kids to survive by violence, enact violent revenge and retribution for harm done to their child, or commit violence as a living to raise their family and while (amazingly) are not completely bankrupt of parenting ideals, they are hardly the shining examples to hold up.

    So now that we have the bad out of the way, and have partially defined what to look for in a good cinema father, here are a few films in which the fathers represented offer some respectability to the institution.

    Atticus Finch (Gregory Peck, TO KILL A MOCKING BIRD)

    Clearly the easiest and most shining example on the list, Finch is a man of significance in his community with a very straight moral compass, and a sense of dignity about his affairs, even when stumping for one of cinema’s great movie speechs. He stands up for himself and his family under no small amount of social pressure for defending those with less privilege in a time and part of the country that under the cloud or racism. More than that, he is gentle and kind with his children without ever pampering or over-entitling him. The film was made when America was at her greatest, and Peck’s portrayal remains perhaps the most iconic movie-dad ever committed to cinema. In short, he leads by examples, means what he says and says what he means. To further underscore his parental excellence, the final shot of the film is Atticus warmly watching his son while he sleeps.

    Ted Arroway (David Morse, CONTACT)

    David Morse is a curious actor, he can be play an unrequited monster (Dancer in the Dark, 12 Monkeys) or in the case of his Ted Arroway in Robert Zemeckis’s Contact, the warmest of father figures. Like Atticus Finch, he is a single parent, so is responsible for imparting both sides of the parenting equation to his young daughter. Instilling a love of communication and curiosity in his daughter both on earth and in heaven (or rather, outer space) and perhaps most important, a sense of patience and practicality (“turn the knob slower“) upon his daughter Ellie. His pride at his daughters accomplishment, and wonder at the vastness of the universe is also communicated very well to both her and the audience.

    Chef Chu (Lung Sihung, EAT DRINK MAN WOMAN)

    A third Widowed father (I am sensing a trend here), Mr. Chu maintains his relationship with his three very different daughters via a large Sunday meal prepared by his own hands. As each of his daughters push further into the modern and western model of women with corporate careers, he offers them a place for their problems at the table without (vocalized) judgement of them. While Mr. Chu is undeniably old fashioned (and reserved) China in a fast-paced and complicated globalized world, he imparts a very real sense of tradition to ground all the craziness. His daughters do not miss these meals, not because he forces them to come, but rather that its how they communicate with their father and each other. Mr. Chu exhibits a quiet dignity and that is not without charm, such as when he starts preparing elaborate lunches for a friends daughter to take to school. He may be a little more reserved than the other dads on this list, but it is clear he has found a some sort of balance in the world with his family.

    ‘Lucky’ Jack Aubrey/Steven Maturin (Russell Crowe, Paul Bettany as surrogate dads, MASTER AND COMMANDER)

    Young Lord Blakeney is doing his duty at sea at a very young age. While an officer, he is only 13 years old and exceptionally quite mature, is very much still a child. With his real father presumably safe on English Soil, he is on the Acheron, a military ship under the command of Jack Aubrey. Early in the film Blakeney loses his arm to infection from splinters caused by enemy canon fire. In a very powerful scene, it is clear that Jack loves the boy and content to play the role of surrogate father. The ships doctor, who indeed severs the wounded arm, also takes him under wing, and a large part of the films characterization is the push-pull of the Military – Science teachings upon the boy. There is a power to teaching the young officer wonder at the variety and mystery of the Natural world and the sacrifices to be made at the hands of leadership and duty. Ultimately one suspects that Lord Blakeney would rise to be a very great, and fulfilled man had there been any sequels to the film with such excellent role models and stand-in-dads.

    Dill (Stanley Tucci, EASY A)

    Spell it with your peas!” is the giddy suggestion from Stanley Tucci’s movie-dad, Dill, upon hearing his daughter got the boot from class for uttering foul language because he doesn’t want her to repeat the word out loud in front of her younger brother. Dill is acutely aware of his daughters adolescence, but feels he has taught her so much about being a good human being (this is of course off screen before the setting of the film, but clear in his body language) that he is willing to let her make her own mistakes. And yet it also makes it clear that while he respects her intelligence and her space, he is there if she needs him. Dill is unabashedly geeky, but clearly has a great relationship with his equally self-deprecating wife (Patricia Clarkson, also a great movie-mom) and they want to lead by the example of their love and playfulness to their children. As much as I liked Easy A, the parenting part of the film is easily my favourite part. While it is rather unabashed in its aim to be a modern John Hughes picture, Dill trumps any of the well rounded parent characters in any of Hughes’ pictures (Yes, including the excellent Harry Dean Stanton in Pretty in Pink).

    Tatsuo Kusakabe (Shigesato Itoi, MY NEIGHBOR TOTORO)

    One of my favourite movie Dads in one of the best parenting movies of all time. Professer Kusakabe’s wife is sick in the hospital, and he is moving his daughters into a new house in the countryside. Wanting to make the best of the transition from city to country, without mom present, he encourages his daughters to help him make the old house livable for their family, while giving them the freedom to explore the grounds at their own pace. He assuages fears with laughter, but is never dishonest about their mothers condition (which I do not believe is fatal, but still serious.) While the littlest daughter Mei does go missing on account of his not being there, he deals with the situation, erring on the side of giving his children freedom rather than suffocating them. My Neighbor Totoro is a wonderful movie that ever parent should show their children, not only for its magic and whimsy, but also for its novel take on parenting.

    Pod (Tomokazu Miura (or Will Arnett/Mark Strong if you prefer the USA/UK Dubs) THE SECRET WORLD OF ARRIETTY)

    Yes, there are two Studio Ghibli movies on this list, most likely because, unlike their American equivalent, Disney, Ghibli tends to craft their tales around unbroken family units and incorporates their precocious young heroes into the greater social fabric, instead of constantly rebelling or subsuming it. So, I will happily include the often overlooked (or outright dismissed) animated adaptation of The Borrowers because indeed, the dad in this one is magnificent. The movie’s first chief incident is Pod, the father, taking his daughter on her first ‘borrowing’ mission. He gently guides her up the lengthy route from their tiny abode below the floor boards into the vast and intimidating world above. He helps her, but gives her space. The image of Pod quietly holding the light and waiting for his daughter to complete her climb is a powerful one. Further, when Arrietty gets entangled with a ‘big person’ in the form of the visting boy who is at the house to convalesce from physical ailment and prepare for heart surgery, her father calmly makes decisions while never outright belittling his daughter for her discoveries. The man is an ocean of calm, but you can see the care and the love painted in the margins. The whole film is that way, there is a lot of depth underneath those quiet, serene surfaces.

    The Man (Viggo Mortensen, THE ROAD)

    OK, this is the toughest one on the list, because unlike most of the other entries here, the main characters are in constant danger, and the world is not full of wonders or promise, but rather a post apocalyptic wasteland where death comes in many forms and life is a living hell. Dad here is also a widower – but 99% of the worlds population is, gone, so there is that – but feels more importantly than he and his son surviving in this world of ash, is that they survive together. While this is ultimate not meant to be (as death comes to us all in the end,) I imagine that the soul of the father watching down might be comforted that they boy is picked up by a potentially complete family near the end of the film, one of the very few positive notes in an otherwise soul-crushing downer of a film. Nevertheless, while travelling to some vague destination over the course (coarse?) of the film, and the Cormac McCarthy novel it was based upon, the father instills what is left, under the circumstances, of a moral code upon his son (i.e. no unnecessary killing and definitely no cannibalism) along with a number of survival skills and a fair bit of kindness and love. Sometimes that is what matters most.

  • Hot Docs 2013: Caucus

    0
    HotDocs13-Caucus

    I‘ll be honest, I had scratched AJ Schnack’s latest film Caucus off my list of potential “to-see” films shortly after I browsed through the Hot Docs 2013 schedule the first time. The promise of being a behind the scenes look at the Republican candidates during the 2011-12 Iowa Caucus filled me with a bit of dread. I have no love for any of the eight politicians the film tracks (and a healthy dose of disgust for some of them) and didn’t particularly relish the thought of re-living the head-slapping moments that played out nightly on the news and The Daily Show. To be clear, that disdain isn’t reserved completely for the right-wing (I have no need to revisit any of the electioneering of the Democrats either), but since the focus of the film was strictly on the first step towards nominating Obama’s rival, I had very little interest.

    Of course, I’m glad I reconsidered. The verite style of the film (ie. no narration, just footage that should “speak for itself”) was a big reason, but Schnack himself as director was probably the biggest. He lobbied several years ago not just for higher quality cinematography in documentary feature filmmaking (which as far as I can tell has helped bring a more careful eye and strong aesthetic to the realm of docs), but a call to an overall broader view of the form. That alone gives him my attention. And if there’s one theme that is becoming evident at this year’s fest (due to its presence and absence in many of the films I’ve seen) it’s the need to understand the position of those who differ strongly in ideology from you. I didn’t expect to learn a great deal more about the political positions (ones which I typically disagree with – in particular the ones based on social issues) of these candidates, but hoped to garner some insight into the voter perceptions of what’s “wrong” with their country.

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Queen of the Bond Girls?

    1

    It was a moment to bring a grin to the face of even the most red-blooded republican, a brilliant instance of classic British humour that created a ripple of laughter around the entirety of the globe, when Queen Elizabeth II appeared in a short film clip as part of the 2012 London Olympic Games opening ceremony.

    The clip opens with super-spy James Bond – played by the ever-cool Daniel Craig – approaching what the audience assumes to be an actress playing her majesty in a Buckingham Palace chamber. To the amazement of those watching, the figure turns around to reveal herself to be the genuine article, the Queen, before being whisked away by helicopter to the Olympic Stadium. The short film proved to be exceptionally popular, and even won her majesty an honorary BAFTA award for her troubles! So how does her appearance rank among the iconic Bond girl moments from throughout the history of this cinematic institution?

    There’s some pretty stiff competition. How about Halle Berry’s iconic entrance in Die Another Day, sauntering out of the ocean clad in an orange bikini and sizzling with sex appeal? Or melodramatic mystic Solitaire (Jane Seymour) from Live and Let Die? Then there’s the quite frankly hilariously named Pussy Galore (Honor Blackman) from Goldfinger, the stunning Anya Amasova from The Spy Who Loved Me

    All these Bong girls have a couple of things in common; a certain quirkiness or individuality, great style and of course, sex appeal, that most classic of Bond girl traits. At first glance it looks an awful lot like the trend for Bond girls needing to be unimaginably attractive has carried on solid-as-a-rock into the 21st Century, with Daniel Craig’s Bond teaming up – definitely a euphemism – with the jaw-dropping likes of Gemma Arterton, Eva Green and Madonna (she’s still got it and we won’t hear otherwise).

    Take a closer look however, and it seems a little like the definition of a ‘Bond girl’ might just be shifting ever so slightly these days… Where Bond seldom used to develop any kind of relationship with female characters who didn’t give him the horn, nowadays 007 is developing real platonic ties with members of the fairer sex; take Judy Dench’s M in Skyfall for example. Before you know it, the super-spy will be tying the knot with a plain-looking specimen with buckets of soul and enough brains to get sponsored on the world casino gaming circuit by Jackpot Capital.

    So is Her Majesty really the Queen of the ‘Bond girls’? We’re not quite convinced to be honest, though she did put in a great show. Maybe this is a sign of things to come; an era of Bond girls with a hundred times the status, minus the looks. If a monarch can parachute into an Olympic stadium, anything is possible… oh and happy birthday too!

  • Outside the Bond Box

    13

    We all have the ideal look and feel of what and who James Bond is or should be in our head. I remember watching “Remington Steele” as a kid (it was on right after “The A-Team” and “Scarecrow and Mrs King”) and always thinking about how great that guy would be in the role of Bond. Although Brosnan had his moments throughout the years, those films are mostly regarded, in retrospect, as terrible flaws within the franchise.

    Then came the news that Daniel Craig would be taking the reins as 007 and everyone (everyone meaning the internet) went berserk with how unorthodox the choice of casting Craig was and how he doesn’t look the part and how a blonde Bond just wouldn’t work. Now, three films later, most of us are all pretty much in agreement that he makes a fantastic Bond – some might argue the best of the bunch. Certainly Casino Royale and Skyfall were critically adored and many people (myself included) believe Skyfall to be the best Bond film to date and Casino Royale to be in the top casino movies ever made. So looking back, maybe choosing the more unconventional Bond is a better way to go – especially 50 years into the character’s history.

    There are hundreds of articles out there with picks on who should take up the mantle of James Bond. The choices are all pretty good (Clive Owen, Michael Fassbender, Tom Hardy, etc.) and I’d love to see these guys working for MI6. But the same names pop up again and again and it’s all pretty stale at this point. So I wanted to pick out a few names that are much more fun to mention/discuss/debate when it comes potential casting of Bond.

    Now I’m not talking going completely off the wall and suggesting an actor that simply isn’t ready or made for the part. I don’t think Christopher Walken or John Goodman is what Bond needs. The actor still has to be “awesome,” to use the parlance of our times. Still, I wanted these casting choices to essentially be stunt casting. Actors that would really shake the foundation and ingrained notion of who and what James Bond the icon is to all of us. So while I thought of about fifty people that would probably nail the part – or at least be interesting for us to watch attempt it – I narrowed it down to these four names that would be fun to watch work within the above mentioned capacity. Take note:

     


    Chiwetel Ejiofor


    Here is easily my number one pick. Dude is suave. Dude is tough as nails. Dude is good looking. Dude is well spoken. Dude is a hell of a good actor. Dude is tragically (and relatively) unknown. Dude is British. I think it’s obvious why this would be a rather unorthodox choice and unfortunately that would probably cause more debate online than the credit of his acting prowess. While it would certainly be regarded as stunt casting and the debate would probably even overshadow talk of the film itself, for those that thought a blonde Bond could never work, this guy has the chops to prove everyone wrong who might find the skin color thing an issue.
    Back-up casting: Idris Alba

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Trance: One of this year’s contenders?

    2

    Every year there are those films that instantly stand out. Often, some of the bigger films get a lot of buzz and excitement before they even come out. Others are underdogs, biding their time until they do
    exceptionally well at the box office.

    Danny Boyle is known for the latter. No one could have predicted the worldwide success of Slumdog Millionaire. The trailer for his latest film, Trance, suggests something of a similar nature. On paper, Trance seems like an ordinary film with a unique twist. On screen, this translates to a unique film that is equally artistic, gritty and perfectly suited to the British director’s style.

    Psychological thriller

    It’s the unique genre and themes that arguably make Trance so exciting. At its base plot, it’s a simple ‘heist gone wrong’ storyline. A theft goes wrong, and a stolen painting is lost. Yet it’s also a psychological thriller. The protagonist, played by James McAvoy, is the auctioneer who knows where it’s hidden, but has forgotten due to head trauma. This leads to the introduction of Elizabeth (Rosario Dawson), as a hypnotherapist tasked with uncovering forgotten memories.

    The trailer sets this up perfectly, in a way that only a renowned director such as Boyle can pull of successfully. Comparing it to recent movies, think of something like a cross between RocknRolla and Limitless. One was a typical gangster film, the other explored human nature and the human brain. Judging by the exciting and engaging trailer, Trance seems to be the best parts of both.

    Combining genres

    So why is this so exciting? If you’ve seen any number of psychological thrillers and gangster films, you probably have noticed a number of patterns and repetition in them. Both need some new life and both do this by breathing unique aspects into the other through Trance.

    What’s been shown so far certainly seems to highlight this. Psychological films tease information out, often turning situations on their head. There’s never a defined ‘right’ or ‘wrong’; that’s why films like Memento prove so popular. Taking this approach into a crime or heist film, where such morals are typically more defined, opens up so many possibilities. Trance plays around a three way power struggle between Simon (James McAvoy), Elizabeth and Franck (Vincent Cassel).

    Of course, the only way to tell is to watch the end results. Will it be worth it? We’ll find out when Trance opens wide on the 27th.

  • From the Archives: Projects That Will Never Be

    11
    archives

    I was browsing through the archives of the third row when I noticed a trend: movie studios and actors are fickle. Variety and THR report information and weeks later, projects change hands, fall apart, or are delayed. It’s fun to look back at the archives and take a look back at projects that will never be (or at least are indefinitely postponed).

    Here’s a list of a few of Hollywood’s ideas from the years past (around 2007-08) that never came to fruition:

    -Article: Todd Field and Ridley Scott both are interested in directing Blood Meridian. Ridley even says the script is written.

    -Article: Chevy Chase is involved in a spoof movie of spoof movies titled Not Another Not Another Movie.

    -Article: Paul Newman and Robert Redford were going to re-team for A Walk in the Woods.

    -Article: The original writer of the masterpiece Road to Perdition was on board to write and direct two film sequels.

    -Article: Ron Perlman replaced Bruce Campbell in the Bubba Ho-Tep sequel.

    -Article: Scorsese was on board to direct a Sinatra biopic.

    -Article: Tom Hanks was involved in a Fahrenheit 451 adaptation.

    -Article: A Jim Henson biopic was in the works with a $30 million budget.

    -Article: Ryan Gosling was rumored to be the new Jack Ryan.

    Are there any old Hollywood projects, ideas, or rumors that you wish had seen the light of day?

  • My 13 Most Anticipated Films of 2013

    6
    Anticipated2013MoodIndigo

    .
    In honour of finally seeing a 2013 movie that I’ve been eager to catch (Chan-wook Park’s Stoker – which was a heaping batch of candy and colour coated fun), I thought I would lay out some of the films I’m most excited to see in 2013. I’m sure I’ve missed a bunch (I’ve heard that Lucretia Martel has a new one coming out this year, but haven’t found any confirmation) and I could make the list even longer (sorry Richard Kelly and Terry Gilliam – you guys just missed the cut), but these 13 stand out as my most anticipated:

     

    Mood Indigo – Michel Gondry

    I’ve already mentioned in a previous post that this became my number one “can’t wait for it” movie of the year the second I heard about it. I’ll always be curious what Gondry does and this looks to have a great sense of wonder to it.

     

    Anticipated2013PigeonSatOnABranch

    A Pigeon Sat On A Branch Reflecting On Existence – Roy Andersson

    This would likely be my number one if I could only be assured it was actually coming out this year…I was over the moon for Andersson’s last film You, The Living from 2007 (not to mention adoring his 2000 film Songs From The Second Floor), so I’ve been waiting somewhat, though only somewhat, patiently for the follow-up…After seeing The Story Of Film at TIFF 2011, I was able to chat very briefly with director Mark Cousins and he said he had seen Andersson’s new film and that it was amazing. And now that this is the third year in a row that predictions are being made about it’s arrival at Cannes, the patience is, ahem, wearing thin. The word “eager” doesn’t even come close to describing my anticipation.

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Star Wars Going Off the Deep End…

    11

    …And you know what? I’m kind of liking it. Story stolen from EW.

     

    A young Han Solo saga, focusing on the wisecracking smuggler’s origin story, and a bounty hunter adventure with Boba Fett at the center of a rogue’s gallery of galactic scum…

    The Han Solo story would take place in the time period between “Revenge of the Sith” and the first Star Wars (now known as “A New Hope”), so although it’s possible Harrison Ford could appear as a framing device, the movie would require a new actor for the lead — one presumably much younger than even the 35-year-old Ford when he appeared in the 1977 original.

    The Boba Fett film would take place either between “A New Hope” and “The Empire Strikes Back,” or between “Empire” and “Jedi,” where the bounty hunter was last seen plunging unceremoniously into a sarlacc pit. Exactly who would play him isn’t much of a complication – in the original trilogy, he never took off his helmet. And in the prequels, we learned he was the son of the original stormtrooper clone, played by Temuera Morrison, who’s still the right age for the part if his services were required.

    In addition to bringing back two fan-favorite characters as the leads of their own films, the Han Solo and Boba Fett projects would also allow Darth Vader, in full-on black death-metal gear, to return as a villain, since placing the spin-offs within the original trilogy would mean he is still alive and hissing. That timeline would also open the door for a return from visit with everyone’s favorite degenerate slug-like gangster, Jabba the Hutt.

    Everything about this screams terrible terrible idea. But you know what? In hindsight, “Phantom Menace” was a terrible terrible idea too (though not as outright awful as “Attack of the Clones”). So I figure they can’t fuck it up anymore, so why not just go for broke? I mean outside of Serenity how many good (or any at all) big screen, space battle movies in the past few years have there been; so might as well give me more Star Wars.

    Sure a young Han Solo played by Ashton Kutcher or some other up and coming douche is probably the worst idea sine Greedo shooting first (copyright Kevin Smith), but again, I can always go back and watch Episodes IV-VI and be perfectly happy with Harrison Ford doing his thing. Nothing will every change that so why worry too much about it? Besides, what if they actually were able to find someone as awesome as the next Nathan Fillion to play the part (Gosling, Rockwell, Garfield, Sturgess, McConaughey, maybe even Fassbender in “young make-up”)? At the very least it’s something to talk about and probably have some fun with. Also, I’m happy to see other parts of the Star Wars galaxy along with more laser guns, more Jedi tricks and I’m certainly anxious to see the Falcon do more loop-de-loops.

    Boba-Fett is an even easier character and doesn’t matter if it isn’t Jeremy Bullock Hell no. It will just be a cool looking battle gear dude hunting down scum in the galaxy. And if it requires taking the helmet off, have the kid from “Clones” play the part – as mentioned in the article above, he’s old enough. Should be awesome with the right creative minds behind it.

    So all you people screaming that Disney is raping Star Wars (I haven’t read much about it in the past few days, but I can only assume this is happening), get over it. Star Wars was raped almost fifteen years ago and then again with the Blu-ray releases. So let’s just keep going and see if something sticks. It will be a hell of an event and most likely it will be a lot of fun – even if it’s terrible. And even more fun to dissect for weeks before and after each subsequent release.

  • Cinecast Episode 283 – The Photographer or the Prostitute

    15

    Please forgive the continued need for a full-time producer as we work our way through yet another video version of the podcast. Despite some technical glitches (that shouldn’t hinder the audio version of the show), Andrew and Kurt get into some good debate about the merits and demerits of Andrew Dominik’s Killing them Softly (complete with SPOILERS!). The homework is fun with some liberties taken by listeners using the new visual format. We both have the same reaction to Tony Kaye’s Detachment in our DVD review and then some good talk on food shortages, pompadours, teenage drama queens and the reefer. A look ahead to the next few weeks rounds things off nicely and we’ll be back next week with our top five female performances of 2012.

    As always, please join the conversation by leaving your own thoughts in the comment section below and again, THANKS FOR LISTENING!


    show

     


     

     

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Need your help…

    10

    I am trying to gather together all the lists of top 100 films from around the world that people consider important. If you know of any lists please feel free to leave a link to them in the comments.

    The lists needs to be inclusive to all films from around the world so lists like the AFI one cannot be included. The lists also need to be inclusive of all genres.

    Thanks for any help.

  • Bring Back the Art of the Intermission

    13


    Chapter ONE

    Part 1: History

    There was a time when intermissions were a staple part of going to the movies. The intermission existed for two reasons. The more obvious one, of course, is to give patrons a chance to take a break; have a smoke, use the rest room or get something to drink or snack on (nowadays a chance to check your email or Twitter?). The real reason, back in the day, was to give the projectionist time enough to switch out the reels – which took a lot more effort and calibration to do so properly. Of course with technological advancements, the need for stopping the movie to switch reels became unnecessary and was eventually phased out.

    Besides the advancements in technology, I presume that the real reason intermissions became gradually more unpopular happened concurrently with the popularity of the multiplex; where dollars (i.e. revenue) became more important than the customer experience. It was important to cram as many screenings of a film into the day as possible. More screenings = more money right? Well maybe, and it depends on who you’re asking.

    While the practice is totally gone from the multiplexes in America today (the last notable film to use the intermission was Gandhi in 1982), one interesting thing to note is that Bollywood still employs the use of intermissions to this day. Reason being is two-fold. One, on average, the run time of a film in India is significantly lengthier than those of Hollywood (though that gap is steadily becoming smaller). And two, it provides a significant source of revenue for theaters as patrons generally fill up on food and drink during this time. Of course I can’t be sure, and I’m not willing to scour obscure sources to find out, but I would bet that a few bags of popcorn, a couple boxes of candy and several sodas, all of which cost the theater practically nothing to produce, would more than make up for the possibility of one (maximum) lost screening.

    I humbly submit to Hollywood and filmmakers, please bring back the art of the intermission!
    » Read the rest of the entry..

Page 1 of 4612345»102030...Last »