Archive for the ‘Film Festivals’ Category

  • Cannes Trailer for Mathieu Amalric’s comedy “Tournée”

    0

    Tournee Movie StillBy now, everyone’s familiar with Mathieu Amalric. From fearless Elle editor Jean-Do to Bond bad guy, he’s a face that once may have receded into the background but now, one can’t help but notice him on screen. But aside from prolific actor, there’s another side to Amalric: director.

    Amalric already has a number of projects under his belt, both shorts and full lengths and hi newest, a comedy titled Tournée (On Tour) recently played Cannes. It’s the story of a Parisian television producer (played by Amalric) who escapes to the US ruined but unwilling to leave France completely behind. He meets and convinces a Burlesque troupe that Paris, and all of France, would love them but the tour doesn’t go as well as planned, these things never do.

    The film appears to have more than a handful of laughs and a bit of drama to keep things interesting and if this trailer is any indication, a fabulous look. There’s something surreal playing at the corners of the images almost like a dream. I was sold on the stills alone but thankfully, it looks like the film itself may be a great deal of fun.

    Trailer tucked under the seats!

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • TCM Film Festival: Capsule Review Wrap-Up

    2

    Just about ready to finally close out the TCM Festival, only running a couple of weeks of weeks late. Heh. Anyway, here are some capsule reviews for the other films I saw but didn’t end up writing full reviews of, for whatever reason. I also threw the couple of shorts programs I saw in here.

    The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly

    1966 Italy. Director: Sergio Leone. Starring: Clint Eastwood, Eli Wallach, Lee Van Cleef.

    Good-Bad-and-Ugly.jpg
    (4.5/5)

    I’ve seen The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly before, but never on a big screen, and I felt that experience was deserving of my time. And it was. There’s a lot more to the movie than I remembered, and I was really struck this time by how omnipresent but yet detached the Civil War is from the main story – our bandits come into close contact with it several times (finding the stagecoach of soldiers, getting captured, becoming involved in the standoff over the bridge), but it’s almost always a mere obstacle in their way. It’s kind of a fascinating juxtaposition, really, between all these men fighting a futile war out of duty and our anti-heroic outlaws double-crossing their self-serving way to a treasure. Anyway. I think that kind of thoughtfulness and depth is what makes this movie great, but what makes it awesome is the score, Clint Eastwood’s implacable smirk, Eli Wallach’s desperate maneuvering, and the languid pacing that knows exactly when to pick up. That last showdown scene has some of the best editing ever in film. Oh, I was also a little surprised to note how close a lot of it is shot. Sure there are a lot of wide vista shots, but for a widescreen western, there are a TON of closeups of faces and eyes – far more than you see in 1950s widescreen films, I think. There are times when it’s positively claustrophobic, which makes for an interesting effect on a giant screen in a huge cinema.

    A few more capsule reviews after the break.

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • TCM Film Festival: Out of Circulation Cartoons

    1
    YouTube - Coal Black and de Sebben Dwarfs [High Quality].jpg

    One of the more intriguing programs at the TCM Festival was a collection of Warner Brothers shorts that were taken out of circulation in 1968 due to negative racial stereotypes, introduced and contextualized by film historian Donald Bogle, who has written several books about the representation of African-Americans in cinema. As a cartoon fan, I was particularly interested in seeing these films which aren’t on DVD and don’t play on television at all, but even though I’m aware of the way these stereotypes played out at the time in live-action, music, art, and literature, I was not really prepared for some of these cartoons. I’m glad to have seen them, but for once in my life, I’m actually in agreement that most of these should not be shown without appropriate contextualization and that they’re more valuable for historical study than for entertainment. I’ve since discovered that many of them are readily available on YouTube, so I’ll link them for you to watch yourself if you’d like.

    A lot of what Bogle said in introduction is pretty close to what you’ll learn from documentaries like Ethnic Notions, a mainstay in classes about race; I watched it with a course I took on the Harlem Renaissance, and it really is an excellent and highly watchable introduction to the portrayals of black stereotypes in popular culture from the mid-1800s through 1950s or so. Most of them stem from the enormously popular minstrel shows of the 19th century, which involved white performers in blackface – these lasted right up into the 1930s, with famous portrayals on film including Al Jolson in the first sound film, The Jazz Singer. Minstrel shows were particularly popular in the north, where there was a lot of curiosity due to the lower black population there – a situation that meant blacks were seen as unfamiliar, other, and both fascinating and potentially threatening. Minstrel shows developed several “types” that were all really intended to take away the potential fear of otherness – the kind old Uncle Tom figure, the nurturing Mammy, the lazy but harmless coon, the highly sexualized younger woman (usually very light-skinned, suggesting mulatto heritage), etc. These four types come up again and again in popular culture, never more exaggerated than they are in the cartoons of the era. One thing to remember is that these cartoons, like most of the films of the time, are not intentionally racist the way such films made today would be – they’re products of pervasive and institutionalized cultural racism. These minstrel show holdover types are essentially the ONLY widespread depictions of African-Americans you’ll find in popular culture at the time, and that’s the real problem here.

    Having already seen Ethnic Notions and understanding some of this background, I think I expected to see these offensive stereotypes in this set of cartoons, but I expected to also see cartoons that were worthwhile aside from that. That is, I expected to be able to look with my academically-trained eyes and say “yes, that is an inappropriate depiction of black Americans that is untrue and offensive, but the quality of the animation and the writing, while not enough to overcome the negativity of the stereotypes, still makes the short worth watching.” And that’s true of several of the cartoons, but there is at least one that is essentially nothing BUT the stereotypes – no gags that aren’t racially-based, no particular design or animation quality that is put toward anything but perpetuating stereotypes, and essentially nothing worthwhile at all. Several of the cartoons have entire sections that are like that, even if there are redeeming features here and there. In other cases, the stereotypes distracted from things that actually would’ve been funny otherwise.

    There are eleven films altogether that Warner Brothers pulled out of circulation in 1968 (other have been essentially pulled since then, especially a few wartime cartoons with negative Japanese stereotypes, but are not usually considered as part of the Censored Eleven, as the 1968 censored films are known); Bogle showed us eight. Those eight are as follows after the jump, in the order he screened them (mostly chronological, but not quite, so as to keep shorts from the same director together).

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • TCM Film Festival: Picspamming Breathless (1960)

    3
    vlcsnap-12925641.jpg
    (4.5/5)

    I have this thing with Breathless. I think it’s great (though I don’t rate it as highly as some other Godard films, which isn’t an insult because I’m a Godard fangirl), and I enjoy it every time I see it, but even though I’ve seen it four or five times, I somehow manage to forget entire chunks of it exist. Every time I watch it, there are scenes where I’m like, “wait, what is this part? Was this part there the last time I saw it?” This is a phenomenon I’m not entirely sure I can explain, especially since the parts I DO remember are indelibly engraved in my psyche.

    A couple of attempts at explanation: 1) The parts I remember are those parts that are indelibly engraved on the psyche of cinephile culture in general. The parts that get included in montages and retrospectives, the parts that get screencapped in film histories, the parts that get talked about when people talk about the influence of the New Wave. Or 2) The parts I forget are the parts that deal with the narrative plot of Michel’s criminal activities and attempts to get the money he’s owed. Godard tends to bury the actual narrative of his films in general, preferring to focus on the moments that would be incidental or skipped over in straight-forward narratives. So from that perspective, it makes sense that I remember the endless conversations in Patricia’s bedroom, or Michel copying Bogart, or Patricia wearing Michel’s hat, or them driving down the Champs Elysses talking about basically nothing, rather than the scenes where Michel is trying to solve his problems.

    Whichever of those explanations is correct, or even if both of them are to some extent, there’s very little I can say about Breathless that hasn’t already been said. So let this instead stand as tribute to the things about Breathless that I find unforgettable.

    (I should mention that the festival played a brand-new Rialto restoration, which is now touring the US. I’m not sure exactly what was restored; it looked really good, but so did the DVD Criterion put out a few years ago. In any case, keep an eye out for when the print tours near you.)

    “What is your greatest ambition in life?”
    “To become immortal, and then die.”

    Many images after the jump.

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Hot Docs 2010 – Marwencol

    0


     

    Marwencol1

     

    After spending 40 days in a coma – the result of a brutal beating outside a bar – Mark Hogancamp woke up. He woke up a different person, though, with significant brain damage and a great deal of memory loss. He now needed to somehow build a new life and get on track, but he just wasn’t sure how to do that since professional therapy was too expensive. But at least he wasn’t drinking anymore. If there’s anything good that came from his hospital stay it’s that he no longer had a taste for alcohol. It just doesn’t appeal to him now, whereas previously, it was the focus of his life. He states that he hasn’t had a girlfriend in over 9 years – 5 of those have been since the incident and the other 4 before it were because he was always drunk.

    There is something else good that came from all this though – his art. Or should I say, his therapy. In order to focus his imagination and help regain some control of the nerves in his hands, Mark has built an entire 1/16 scale replica of a WWII Belgium town in his backyard. It comes complete with vehicles, soldiers, a bar and, of course, 27 Barbies. The characters in his village have elaborate stories worked out for them on a daily basis and it all gets documented in hundreds of photos. These individual storylines play out fights, love affairs, suspicious behaviour and a whole lot of staged catfights between the Barbies. It’s his imagination after all, so he can use it however he sees fit. He’s trying to practice it every day after having it almost stolen from him years ago.

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Hot Docs 2010 – Waste Land

    0


     

    WasteLand2

     

    It’s where everything not good goes – including people.

     

    The Jardim Gramacho landfill outside of Rio De Janeiro is the largest in the world in terms of the volume of refuse received to it on a daily basis. It’s rolling hills of garbage give the ground the consistency of Jell-o as hundreds of “pickers” walk through it every day to collect recyclables for money. 200 tons of recycling a day get removed by these people, many of whom live in the slums just outside the dump. Though for some they can make a “decent” wage ($20-25 a day), it looks like a horrible life. The people we meet though – the pickers – are wonderful, delightful and full of life.

    Lucy Walker’s film “Waste Land”, though, begins in a completely different realm than this landfill. Things start in New York City, as we follow Brazilian-born artist Vik Muniz. His tools of the trade are mostly non-traditional items which he uses to create pictures that he then photographs. Thread, wire, chocolate syrup, caviar, diamonds, pigments and sugar are some of the objects he has used for his work (his photos of the pictures he has created from sugar are stunning) – not looking like much on close inspection, but becoming something beautiful at larger distances. Similar to how his hometown of Sao Paolo is described…

    Given this, it’s not much of a stretch to imagine him wanting to work with garbage. This idea (and the film) quickly move beyond just a simple document of his latest series of works though. Once the decision to go to Jardim Gramacho is taken, it doesn’t take long for them to meet some of the pickers. His approach is to take photos of some of his new acquaintances, project them on the floor and them fill them in with a variety of recycling material pulled from the landfill before the final photo is taken.

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Hot Docs 2010 – The Kids Grow Up

    0


     

    TheKidsGrowUp

     

    Director Doug Block (51 Birch Street) is an obsessive documentarian. He seems to have endless footage of his daughter throughout her life – following her around, asking her questions – and continues to add to the archives as she prepares to leave for university. She’s becoming less and less thrilled with the idea, but he just can’t seem to stop. His little girl isn’t just moving on to another chapter of her life…She’s leaving. And he’s not quite ready for that.

    Can any parent really be ready for that though? I guess you can prepare and come to an understanding of your nest emptying out, but can you really be ready? In order to explore that question (and attempt to work it through for himself), Block uses his old footage of his daughter (starting around age 4) with its snippets of long conversattions about what she wants to be when she grows up and intersperses it within current day chats and other “home movie” moments. His daughter Lucy (now 17) is working her way through the last year of high school, spends more time with her friends, has found a boyfriend and doesn’t quite want to spend as much time in front of the camera as she used to. Block persists though.

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Hot Docs 2010 Awards

    0


     

    ThunderSoul

     

    As Hot Docs 2010 has wrapped for another year – their most successful year ever by the way – now is the time to review some of the award winners. The Audience Award winner was announced today (along with the Top 10 top vote-getters) and the jury-voted Industry Awards last Friday. Before getting to the results though, a bit more about the success of the fest:

     

      - 136000 tickets sold during the 11 day period of the festival – a record for Hot Docs
      - 170 of the 275 public screenings went “rush”
      - a 10% increase in sales over last year
      - 2088 films submitted in all to the festival

     

    That’s great news for us documentary fans.

    Though my prediction for the Audience Award winner didn’t quite come true, A Small Act still finished in the Top Ten along with a fine crop of others. The big winner was Thunder Soul, the story of the reunion of members from the Kashmere High School Stage Band – a powerhouse funk outfit led by Conrad Johnson that decimated its opposition in band competitions in the 70s. Here’s the full Top Ten:

     

    Hot Docs Audience Awards

      1. THUNDER SOUL (Mark Landsman; USA)
      2. A DRUMMER’S DREAM (John Walker; Canada)
      3. MY LIFE WITH CARLOS (German Berger; Chile , Spain , Germany)
      4. AUTUMN GOLD (Jan Tenhaven; Austria , Germany)
      5. LEAVE THEM LAUGHING (John Zaritsky; Canada , USA)
      6. RUSH: BEYOND THE LIGHTED STAGE (Scot McFadyen, Sam Dunn; Canada)
      7. LISTEN TO THIS (Juan Baquero; Canada)
      8. A SMALL ACT (Jennifer Arnold; USA)
      9. WASTE LAND (Lucy Walker; UK , Brazil)
      10. MARWENCOL (Jeff Malmberg; USA)

     

    Fourth place finisher in balloting, Autumn Gold also won the Filmmakers Award – a new award this year for which Hot Docs invites attending filmmakers with official selections in the 2010 Festival to vote for their favourite film.

     

    And the big winners from the jury voting:

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Hot Docs Capsule Reviews – The Technology vs Nature Edition

    9


     

    WeDontCareAboutMusicAnyway2

     

    As Hot Docs 2010 winds down, here’s another sampling of a few of the films I’ve caught over the last week:

     
     

    Soundtracker

    Soundtracker (2010 – Nicholas Sherman) – Tracking down sounds is indeed exactly what Gordon Hempton does. He’s finding it harder and harder to do, though, with the proliferation of technology spreading into National Parks and supposedly untouched areas. Nearby highways, construction areas and jet planes contaminate the voices of nature and leave places of complete quiet or simple natural sounds to become fewer and farther between. So Hempton searches for them. His obsessive nature shows its light towards the back half of this slow-paced, but overall lovely contemplative look at how we’re slowly but surely drowning out Mother Nature.

     

    talhotblond

    talhotblond (2010 – Barbara Schroeder) – It’s all in the telling. A good story can be turned into a great one if you tell it with all the proper beats, hold back little bits of information and then drop in some surprises. That’s the strategy in this telling of a bizarre internet love triangle of two co-workers becoming rivals for the affections of a girl with the screen name “talhotblond”. One of the two men isn’t exactly what he describes himself to be online and as the truth comes out, tragedy ensues. There’s some interesting questions raised by the film regarding the veracity of the internet, the culpability of those who hide behind false identities and how we look at privacy. Some of those questions could even be raised about the film itself in how it handles the story. Perhaps, but it sure doesn’t stop this from being a gripping, surprising and ultimately very sad story.

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • TCM Film Festival: (The Complete) Metropolis (1927)

    6
    Metropolis-babylon.jpg
    (5/5)

    Before I get into the full review of this, I have a directive: GO SEE this restored version of Metropolis if and when it tours through your city. It’s opening in Los Angeles next week and then touring around various cities after that (full schedule here). There, now even if you don’t click through the read the rest of this, my main point has been made.

    Fritz Lang’s Metropolis has been lauded as a high point of science fiction, silent cinema, German cinema, and Expressionist style almost since it was first released in 1927. And since its release in 1927, that has been true despite the fact that it was edited rather severely almost immediately after release, and nearly 30 minutes of its original run time has been lost for decades. In what I’m sure will go down as one of the greatest footage discovery stories in restoration history, a print of the film containing almost all of this lost footage was found in Buenos Aires in 2008, and preservationists have been working to restore it ever since. The footage is from a 16mm print and was in pretty bad shape when they found it; as such, it’s easy to tell which sections are from the Buenos Aires print because they’re in noticeably worse condition. But that makes it all the easier to tell which footage is new and laud the restoration of it, because it really does make a big difference in the flow of the film.

    I’ve seen Metropolis a couple of times at home before, and you know, liked it a good bit, but it never really blew me away. This time, it was a good half hour after it was over before I could properly walk and talk; it was that overwhelming an experience. There are a lot of things that contributed to my reaction, I’m sure – seeing it on a giant screen, with a very nearly sold-out audience, the incredible live score performance by the Alloy Orchestra, the better pacing and more involving story the restored footage provides, my own greater understanding of silent cinema – but I’m not sure it really matters. This viewing of Metropolis has easily become the most incredible cinematic experience in my life so far.

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Hot Docs Review – A Small Act

    5


     

    ASmallAct3

     

    I‘m pretty sure I just saw the Audience Award winner of Hot Docs 2010. If I was a betting man, I’d plop a nice chunk of change down on A Small Act coming out on top after all the votes have been cast. Sure the Rush documentary has the built-in fan base and is a ton of fun (and it just won the Tribeca Audience Award), but Jennifer Arnold’s latest (a finalist for the Grand Jury Award at Sundance) is warm, triumphant, hopeful and inspiring without ever being the slightest bit mawkish or sappy. It’s basic premise is that anyone can make the world a better place – if not on a grand scale, at least by making a difference to individual people – one small act at a time.

    The main through line of the film is the story of three young Africans from a small village in Kenya. They are all smart and have loads of potential, but their families lack the funds necessary to put them into high school. Without some form of assistance, they will likely get sucked into the cycle of poverty so many have before. This is where the Hilde Back Educational Fund comes into play. It has been set up by a former resident of the same village to help those students who show promise, but lack the financial station to pay for their early education. Chris Mburu heads the fund and simply wants to pass along the same type of act of kindness that was provided to him when he was of the same age and couldn’t afford schooling. It came from a middle age Holocaust survivor who had fled to Sweden and was looking to give something back and help someone just like she had been helped after leaving her home country. Her donations (to the tune of about $15 a month) gave Chris the chance to acquire an education. And that he did. After attending Nairobi University, he went to Harvard, became a lawyer and now works at the United Nations as a human rights attorney specializing in areas like genocide. He never forgot that small gesture from a woman he had never met, so he named a new educational fund after her.

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • M-SPIFF Review: I Am Love

    0

     


    Director: Luca Guadagnino
    Story: Luca Guadagnino
    Screenplay: Luca Guadagnino, Barbara Alberti, Ivan Cotroneo, Walter Fasano
    Producers: Luca Guadagnino, Francesco Melzi d’Eril, Marco Morabito, Tilda Swinton, Alessandro Usai, Massimiliano Violante
    Starring: Tilda Swinton, Flavio Parenti, Edoardo Gabbriellini, Marisa Berenson
    Country of Origin: Italy
    MPAA Rating: R
    Running time: 120 min.

    (4/5)

     

    While the stuffier movie goers (such as myself) are going to find a lot to salivate over in Guadagnino’s I Am Love, the Italian’s answer to Terrence Malick, the more typical movie goer might find much of the substance (if you can call it that) within the film to be rather yawn inducing and some of the “overwrought artfulness” of the experience to be so excruciatingly detailed in its pretentiousness that it might be almost laughable. Yet it is exactly that ambitious attention to detail and the filmmaker’s exact intention of stirring all five of the audience’s senses that is possible for a film to provide that has kept this picture stirring around in my brain for the last five days. There might not be a whole lot going on, but there is a whole lot going on from a visceral perspective.

    Tilda Swinton leads the cast as Emma; a Russian immigrant who has married into an extremely wealthy, Italian textile tycoon’s family. As the patriarch reaches old age, he announces his son (Emma’s husband) and his now of age grandson as successors to the family business. The grandson then juggles the demands of being a co-CEO of a million dollar corporation along with his real passion of opening a fine restaurant with his Italian friend, Antonio, in the mountains of Italy. The central story thread then follows Emma on an ill-advised affair with Antonio, while the subplots involve family jealousy within the business, corporate ethics, struggling with outing oneself as a homosexual and keeping up appearances within a household holding lavish dinner parties whilst keeping important political ties.

    » Read the rest of the entry..