Archive for the ‘Film Festivals’ Category

  • VIFF Contest: Win “A Drummer’s Dream” tickets

    7

    The Vancouver International Film Festival kicks off tomorrow morning and we’ve got a bit of a treat for our readers.

    Considered by many to be one of the best cinematographer/directors in Canada, John Walker returns with a new documentary A Drummer’s Dream, a music documentary which brings together some of the finest drummers in the world.

    A feast for the ears, this energetic doc records a gathering of master drummers on a remote island in rural Canada. In veteran John Walker’s film, they’ve come together to bond, share secrets, teach enthusiastic young prodigies and jam like hell. It’s a wonderfully multicultural mix – African-American, Cuban, Filipino and Caucasian players, all speaking the same universal language. There’s a profusion of styles on display here, from Latin grooves to pounding rock beats.

    We hear from all the main drummers about their origins as musicians: their fumbling first steps, their moments of revelation, the secrets of their techniques, their philosophies of musicianship. All of them are quite articulate about what drives them and how it took shape in their lives. “There’s no big secret,” says one virtuoso with decades of success behind him, “Effort is all.” It’s an inspiring message: that the dream is open to anyone with a strong will.

    A Drummer’s Dream is playing twice at the festival (showtimes and locations) and we’ve got a double pass to the screening of the film on Monday, October 4th at 6:30PM at the Empire Granville 7 Th 2. To enter, simply leave a comment below before Saturday, October 2nd at midnight.

    Winner will be drawn from all entries and contacted via email with details of picking up their prize.

    Trailer for the film tucked under the seats.
    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • After the Credits Episode 88 – VIFF Preview 2010

    5

    Dale (Digital Doodles), Khaled (@khaled_ca), Jason (@jmv), Vanessa (Pop Goes the World, @popgoestheworld) and I look ahead to the Vancouver International Film Festival.

    Row Three:
    RSS Feeds:
    Subscribe to “After the Credits”
    Subscribe to ALL the RowThree Podcasts on one feed
    Subscribe to all posts and discussions

    Subscribe with:

    We can also be contacted via email – marina@rowthree.com!

    Show Notes:

    Films we’re excited to see:

     

  • Row Three Presents: MASSIVE TIFF10 SUMMARY

    35

     

    Between written coverage and Mamo! on the Street podcasting, we hope you have enjoyed the extensive coverage Row Three brought your way during the 11 day madness of this years edition of the Toronto International Film Festival, or as pretty much everyone attending calls it, TIFF10. We have Mike Rot, Bob, Kurt and both Matts (B. and P.) together for our annual mega-post, offering a quick summary and a tag [Best], [Loved], [Liked], [Disappointed], [Hated] and [Worst] for each of the films we watched. And if you will indulge some mild boasting, I think it is safe to say that outside of the trade papers and festival catalogue, you will be hard pressed to find a more wide-reaching survey of the films played at TIFF10. For perspective, some of us were seeing more films in a day than the average American sees annually. Quick thoughts for all 100+ films are organized below to give you as much of a snapshot as possible for what to expect and to look forward to over the next 18 months as these films will (some quicker than others) move into the increasingly varied forms of distribution; some may appear on the big screen, but it is getting more and more likely that for the oddball gems, it will mean importing a DVD or checking your TV and Internet VOD listings.

    The SHORT version:

    The Best: The Illusionist (Bob), Black Swan (Matt P., Matt B.), Another Year (Kurt) and Blue Valentine (Mike Rot)

    The Worst: Passion Play (Bob), Bunraku (Kurt), L.A. Zombie (Matt B.), Film Socialism (Matt P.) and Miral (Mike Rot)

    But to really get to the heart of the festival, check out our MASSIVE summary which is tucked under the seat.

    All of our FULL REVIEWS during this years festival can be found by clicking the Big White Banner.

     

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • VIFF 10 Review: Anton Chekhov’s The Duel

    0

    VIFF Reviews Headline

    The Duel Movie Still

    I was partway through a reading of Fyodor Dostoevsky’s “Brothers Karamazov” for a literature class when I came to the conclusion that Russian literature is really not my cup of tea. Like Jane Austen’s work, I found much of what I’d read heavy on the who and where and not nearly enough time on the what and why but unlike Austen’s novels which I did come to love, I never could find it in my heart to pick-up another Russian novel though I never walked away from film adaptations as I found most of them did away with the boring bits and got right to the heat of the action, often at the cost of the “boring bits.”

    Enter Dover Koshashvili and his film Anton Chekhov’s The Duel. Deftly adapted from Chekhov’s short story by new-comer Mary Bing, this is the story of a man who has lost his way. Laevsky has escaped to a seaside town in the Caucasus’ with his lover, the beautiful Nadia, who happens to be married to another man. The two left the big city with dreams of making a new life for themselves but Laevsky has spent his money and his heart has grown cold and he claims to his friends that he no longer loves his mistress (though he appears to have no problem using her none the less). In an attempt to leave this now failed life behind and start afresh, he concocts a plan to borrow money, take a ship and abandon Nadia with no money and no one to turn to. Through a series of events, plausible ones considering the small group of “society” folk that appear to be around, Von Koren, a naturalist who already dislikes Laevsky, challenges the man to a duel on the grounds of protecting his honour.

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Review: Film Socialism

    6

    Director: Jean-Luc Godard
    Writer: Jean-Luc Godard
    Producer: Ruth Waldburger
    Starring: Catherine Tanvier, Christian Sinniger, Jean-Marc Stehlé, Patti Smith, Alain Badiou
    Year: 2010
    Running time: 102 min.

    Quite fittingly, Jean-Luc Godard’s already-notorious Film Socialism was the last film I saw at this year’s Toronto International Film Festival. Having read reports of its difficult qualities (on top of being fully aware of his work’s striking transformations over the course of his career), I knew I was in for a rough ride when I walked into the theatre, and even had in mind the famous credits that accompany his 1967 film Weekend: “End of Film,” “End of Cinema.” Those words quite definitively marked the end of a remarkable run of films that at once reflected and defined the decade in which they were made. But anyone willing to follow Godard beyond then would have to turn away from Jean Seberg, Jean-Paul Belmondo, Anna Karina and all other traces of romanticism from that phase of his work as he delved deeper into political theory, philosophy, video technology and an increasingly experimental style that tossed conventional narrative techniques out the window.

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • TIFF Winner, “The King’s Speech” Gets a Fancy Trailer

    2

    Until about five minutes ago, all I knew about The King’s Speech was that it won the people’s choice award at The Toronto International Film Festival this year and it stars Mr. Colin Firth completely kicking ass (per usual). Now with this trailer being released I see that Helena Bonham Carter, Geoffrey Rush, Timothy Spall, Guy Pearce and Michael Gambon are also involved. Good heavens does this scream amazing or what?

    As someone who majored in Speech Therapy in college, the plot of the film further intrigues me as it seems to be focusing on the King of England’s inability to speak properly due to a fairly sever stutter. With war on the horizon the King must speak for a nation. But for someone who stutters… not the easiest task. In what looks to be a pretty dramatic story but carried out in an almost playful manner, I have no doubt these actors are going to pull off something special here.

    Early Oscar predictions are already buzzing all about this picture. Which isn’t all that surprising consider director Tom Hooper already has loads of award nominations under his belt for the excellent television mini-seires John Adams and the much fawned over, The Damned United. Take a look at the trailer below and see what you think. At the very least, it’s shot wonderfully.
     

     

  • Extended Thoughts: Another Year

    1

     

     

    Mike Leigh’s tenth Feature film, assembled in the usual fashion of character and screenwriting collaboration with his actors, is very much his typical take on the various work-a-day folk in Britain. But then again, glancing at his C.V. you will see that his films which consist of mainly people talking and talking and talking have won pretty much every major world cinema prize imaginable, BAFTA, Oscar, Palm D’Or, Golden Lion, you name it, so the run-of-the-mill Mike Leigh film is pretty fucking excellent. Of the nearly 50 features I caught at this years edition of the Toronto International Film Festival, Another Year comes out on top. I laughed, I cried, I begged for more drinking, smoking and gardening with these regular folks, some of whom have found out the secret of partaking of life’s joys, and others on the rock-bottom pit of despair. But mostly, the ritual of social behavior, how the tone and the attitude of the conversation is equally telling, perhaps moreso, than the content. People love to talk, but when they actually ‘communicate’ that is when the warm and fuzzy thing we call intimacy is achieved.

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • TIFF Review: Monsters

    4

     

     

    There are monsters amoung us – figuratively and literally – in the simple yet aptly titled not-quite-creature-feature, Monsters. Sometime in the near future a wee spot of primordial alien matter got all tangled up with a returning man-made space probe. After about 6 years the effects of the tag-along DNA have resulted in some rather large and terrifying beasties that call about half of Mexico, from Mazatlan to Tampico and all the way north to the American border, home. The Americans respond by building a towering and intimidating 30 meter high concrete wall that makes the $1.2 billion 2006 mandated (by Bush and company) fence looks like no more useful than to pen in goats. The term “Fortress America” is starting to sound rather closer to reality. It being the US-Mexico border, stuff is bound to penetrate and be met with an overabundance of force. Not quite Don Johnson in Machete, but you have to wonder if the response creates half the problem. While Monsters is no Starship Troopers, it is about as far from the crazy violence or anti-fascist bombast as possible, there is a satirical streak hidden under it all that probably would make Paul Verhoeven concede a knowing nod to its sub-textual, humanist slant.

    Apparently, it was director Gareth Edwards’ goal to make the most ‘realistic’ movie about gigantic monsters invading earth as possible. If that means a quieter, more mundane tone, more a movie of our collective environment altered by the presence of alien beings rather than the typical crash-and-smash mayhem caused by invaders from Mars then so be it. He has succeeded in an act of alternate-future that feels real, it feels lived in, and there is a sense of the mundane and normalcy that is almost always lacking in pictures of these type. Shooting in the central American wilderness and small towns therein make for a gorgeous movie on top of its unconventional execution. To say it defies expectations, the constant comparisons to District 9 are, on one hand, appropriate yet still quite misleading. Monsters is not an action picture, it is a contemplative road picture. That it defies easy comparison is simply because there are not enough of these movies made to draw accurate comparisons. I was rather reminded by the opening hours of the 1980s TV miniseries “V” or perhaps Alien Nation; where the presence of extra-terrestrials make a large-scale change on society merely by existing in it. But it also evokes the social journey-films of Alfonso Cuarón, pick either Y tu mama tambien or Children of Men, there are similarities to both. We exist in our environments even as a collective societal shift from panic to uncertainty to ‘the new normal’ follows any major global ‘sea change.’ Of course, all of this inferred shock and awe happens offscreen, only implied by a few title cards. The Monsters could just have easily been another country’s military occupation of modern Mexico, or how the world at this point is rather used to the quagmire in Iraq after 6 years of US entrenchment. As it stands, the gigantic walking squids are here, and they have left their mark, but are now simply a part of the fabric of North American life. This is the greatest achievement of the film, and one that allows for a bit of consideration and politics, although, really the joy is simply existing in this plausible new world order. Part of me wishes that if someone is going to make Max Brook’s overcooked novel World War Z, Gareth Edwards would be the man to leaven out the breathless hyperbole of the ‘letters from the front’ and make it a mature allegory for adults.

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • TIFF Review: Confessions

    2

     

    Confessions1

     

    A lot of people are going to have problems with Japan’s submission to the 2011 Foreign Film Oscar race. I know I do. There are levels of cynicism, cruelty and exploitation that run very deep. And yet, if I’m being totally honest with myself, the film grabbed my attention from the start and kept my level of engagement in it as it went along. Its style and pacing are remarkable – in particular the opening 30 minutes, which consists almost entirely of junior high teacher Yuko Moriguchi’s monologue to her class. The oppressive greyness of the classroom, the timely short flashbacks and the non-stop barely audible pulsing soundtrack all work toward making the entire sequence riveting. By the end of Ms. Moriguchi’s half hour tale of her daughter’s death at the hands of two of her students, you feel completely drained. It’s at this point that the rest of the confessions begin and I still haven’t yet figured out whether or not it should have simply ended here and remained a perfect short film.

    Yuko’s class is filled with self-involved and very cruel 12-13 year-old kids. They jump at any chance to make fun of a classmate, show no respect for their elders and love to make huge assumptions about others that they quickly turn into fact. As she informs these kids, on this last day of term, that she is leaving the school they barely pay her the slightest bit of attention, except perhaps for a brief celebratory cheer. Until, of course, she begins to make the accusations. As she winds through her thought processes and sleuthing work, she claims that students A and B were responsible (she doesn’t reveal the names right away to the class) – one for the initial act that was intended to cause the harm and the other for unwittingly actually finishing the job when he tried to cover things up. As it becomes obvious to the class who students A and B are, the audience reaches an inescapable conclusion: the entire class of kids is really screwed up. Not just because they’re rude and selfish, but because they don’t appear to have any capacity to care for others. Yuko wonders if they can actually appreciate the preciousness of life at all. As the film shifts from Yuko’s monologue and initial revenge to the individual confessions of the others, it seems to state that they can’t.
    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • TIFF Review: Machete Maidens Unleashed

    2

     

    MacheteMaidensUnleashed3

     

    Blood is not the only thing they suck!”
    “They caged their bodies, but not their desires!”
    “She’s a one Mama massacre squad!”
    “They’re over-exposed but not under developed!”
    “Their guns are hot and their bodies are hard!”
    “Filmed in Slimerama!”

    Blood. Breasts. Beasts. Interested yet? If that and the above tag lines don’t tickle your fancy than perhaps the documentary Machete Maidens Unleashed is not for you. However, if you can see the humour in these attention-grabbers, you’ll likely have a great deal of fun with Mark Hartley’s (director of ozploitation documentary Not Quite Hollywood) look at an era of low budget exploitation films made in the Philippines. Like his previous film, it’s a mostly fast-paced overview of the silliness of these old B-movies (made mostly for consumption at Drive-Ins from the late 60s to the early 80s) and the stories behind the making of them. It also manages to inject some fascinating information about the era, the nation of the Philippines and the nature of the film industry at the time. How’s that for added value?

    The movie titles alone should be enough to get across the type of films were dealing with here: Mad Doctor Of Blood Island, Savage Sisters, Student Nurses, Cover Girl Models, T.N.T. Jackson and Humanoids From The Deep were all made at rock bottom prices in the south seas. The primary reason for choosing this filming location, of course, was the incredibly cheap price of production and labour, but side benefits included stunt men who would literally do anything, the absence of requirements for safety guidelines and the occasional assist (via equipment and troops) from the military. Apocalypse Now wasn’t the only film that benefited from the government’s willingness to court the money of film production teams. Roger Corman even admits that after he saw the bottom line “my scruples went away and I said let’s do another”. Corman wasn’t the only eye looking towards the Philippines, though, as plenty of producers saw the benefits. These B-movies were staples of the American movie going experience at a time that drive-ins pulled in sizable audiences. Of course, Filipino producers and directors were cranking out product for this hungry audience as well. One of their biggest successes (and an embarrassment to the government when it became one of the only films picked up for distribution at that year’s Manila Film Festival) was For Y’ur Height Only starring pint-sized Weng-Weng as a James Bond style secret agent.
    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Mamo #180: For the Love of Bed

    7

    Here’s our final (and unfortunately somewhat buzzy) podcast from the Toronto International Film Festival 2010, with special guest star Mad Hatter! Thanks for joining us.

    To download this podcast use the following URL: http://rowthree.com/audio/mamo/mamo180.mp3

  • TIFF Review: You Are Here

    1

     

     

     
    Here is an experiment. Take the name of six colours, write them in random order several times using a coloured pen that does not match the name of the colour. Time yourself reading this list of colours. Write the same list of colours using only black ink and time yourself reading the list. The mind works is strange ways, and has trouble if preconceived associations to familiar things or objects get too close to one another. Daniel Cockburn, a Toronto video artist has just made a wild and crazy jump into features with a film-slash-brain-experiment that wants to perform a witty and colourful brain massage. He wants to play with your cerebellum in the same way that the perception of film works: ‘Persistence of Vision’ as shutters push single frames to form the illusion of movement. We will ignore the contradiction that he mainly shoots on video. Contradictions are what the film is about.

    Cockburn wants to expand your consciousness or provide the illusion of expanding your consciousness or expand your consciousness while providing the illusion that he has not. You Are Here. The statement is both a location as well as a confirmation of existence. Different things, really. The red dot that defines your location on the map can be just as much of a misleader as a guide. The meaning of the film goes beyond the dual-nature of the title into something that is both profound and a profoundly funny. It is science. It is art. It is absurd and hilarious sleight-of-hand. It is an ultra lo-fi version of Inception in which the filmmakers might as well be Leonardo Di Caprio and company (in shabbier clothing mind-you) and the audience are simultaneously the beneficiary of planted ideas and the mark of a baffling grift. The TIFF catalogue labels the film as Dr. Seuss meets Samuel Beckett, and I cannot really argue with that. It is an apt a description as you are going to get without telling you much. When it ended after an all too brief 75 minutes, I was upset. I wanted to see how many more times the filmmakers could fold their narrative in upon itself while keeping me in its spell. Riding the wave, before it collapsed. Like any good performer, Cockburn knows to keep the audience wanting more. Or they ran out of money, drugs or the ability to keep a hold of the reigns. I am sure the director will never tell.
    » Read the rest of the entry..