There’s something to be said for “talking head” movies. When intelligent people discuss interesting or novel ideas in passionate ways, you don’t necessarily need an overall story arc, narrative thrust or cinematic quality to the proceedings – smart people saying smart things can be engaging enough. Certainly none of those other elements would hurt, though, and the addition of them can lead to fascinating viewing. So I had my hopes up for Gary Burns and Jim Brown’s latest film The Future Is Now!. It purported to have a bevy of experts (in fields of architecture, art, evolutionary science, etc.) talking about what the future might have in store for us and how our lives might change. To do this, the film wraps the fictional story of a disconnected cynical man being shown what humanity might achieve as he gets to interview these thought leaders. I bought into this rather odd concept and the claims of “a cinematic voyage through endless future possibilities” partially due to the directors’ previous film – the fun and very sharp Radiant City – which combined wonderfully staged interviews of urban planners with the story of a suburban family trying to cope with the many pros and cons of living in their neighbourhood. So I expected The Future Is Now! to be filled with smart people, clever structural devices and superb filmmaking.
Though I can’t blame them for trying something different, the only thing that works are the actual talking heads – and only when they are allowed to go off on their own tangents and aren’t forced into answering specific questions. Had they but only filmed these curious thinkers chatting to a single static camera, the film would’ve been far more thought-provoking. The artificiality of the construct that a Woman Of Tomorrow (a TV news reporter) is able to line up all these people to convince this one cynical guy (dubbed the Man Of Today) that the world has hope finally sinks the film. That’s not to say it doesn’t occasionally induce a certain amount of percolation of ideas in your brain: the architect Shigeru Ban does pro bono relief work that has far reaching benefits, the author Rivka Galchen briefly mentions the concept of parallel universes spawned every time a decision point is reached, Richard Dawkins sees genetics as “a branch of information technology” and even Jean-Paul Sartre (as the ghost of yesterday) chimes in to point out the logical fallacy of seeing oneself as completely different from everyone else. Whatever inspiration evolves from these moments is constantly undermined by the framing story and its unfortunate proclamations.















