Archive for the ‘Directors’ Category

  • Rank ‘em: David Lynch Films

    16

    Years back I took a chance at the DVD store and bought a certain film by director David Lynch (I don’t wanna give away which one just yet as it’s number 1 on my list). From then on I was a die hard Lynch fan. I sought out every other film he has ever made and have since watched them all multiple times (some more than others). One of the masters of weird and surreal American cinema, I find even when one of his films perhaps doesn’t work as a whole, there’s always something interesting to experience. He is possibly my favorite director at this point in time.

    Below is my ranking of all 10 David Lynch films, not including shorts, TV shows (sorry, Twin Peaks, as much as I love ya’) and anything else that isn’t a full-length feature film. Mind you this is going by my mood at this particular moment, and the list could change half an hour from now. For kicks I’ve included a moment/scene to highlight each film (spoilers lay within).

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • DVD Review: HIGH (1967)

    0

     

    A fortunate encounter at this years edition of Fantasia has led me to a treasure trove of Larry Kent (Canada’s godfather of indie and counterculture cinema who has been active from the early sixties right up to two new films in the past 4 years) DVDs which I will be exploring over the next couple weeks. The kick-off is the drug psychedelic kill-trip that pre-dates Natural Born Killers and The Doom Generation by several decades: 1967′s HIGH.

    Tom is a college drop-out who keeps his sex and drug fuelled lifestyle going by playing gigolo to older women (and stealing their husbands credit cards, post-coitus), selling oregano to undiscriminating acquaintances, while keeping the good ganja for himself, and otherwise confidently hustling his way in and out of situations. He is somewhat of a cross between Breathless-era Jean-Paul Belmondo and Fritz the Cat, who may or may not have a few bastard children scattered about his stomping grounds of late sixties Montreal. His femme-du-jour, Vicky, may on occasion, pester him about ‘the future’ but for now – and in the now – she has no issues about getting down in an impromptu, casual three-way with her roommate under marijuana-laden red-filter cinematography. One of the films best scenes (and one of several sex scenes) has the contrast so low that you can only make out hats and hair: an animated tangle of long locks AND short pubes. Tom’s recent score of a Finnish Diplomat’s Charge-Ex card leads to a getaway weekend consisting of airports, 5-Star hotels, upscale city eateries and romping around in the fountains and shops along Kings St. in Toronto. Upon the couples return to Montreal, there is a desire for a little more of the good life, obtained the easy way. Before you can say, “Live fast, die young, and leave a good looking corpse,” director Larry Kent has (whether intentionally or not) changed the rules of the criminal youth on the run genre before they have even been fully fleshed out. Both Bonnie and Clyde and High at the time were playing festivals simultaneously, and while the latter doesn’t have the caliber of actors featured in the former, or the technical resources for that matter, it makes up for it with the tools of the indie filmmaker, a veneer of exploitation and lot of pluck. Supposedly, Warren Beatty was a big fan when both films played alongside one another in the Montreal International Film Festival in ’67.

    For someone born in the 1970s, I have to wonder how High was received at the time of its release, beyond the simple factual history of its censoring and banning by the Quebec government. Sporting a psychedelic soundtrack, an in-the-moment vibe that seems to celebrate and condemn the free-loving hippie life-style and straddling the divide of a porn peep show and a Canadian riff on European arthouse of the day. With the French Nouvelle Vague in full swing in arthouse circles, Jack Smith on the experimental film/theatre side of things in New York, and the Summer of Love writ large in popular culture of the time, High seems to exist right middle of all these things while still being its own vérité beast. Viewing a film like this 40+ years after its release it can on one hand be considered a fascinating cultural document, on the other hard to disentangle from trends and fads of the day. Cinematic capture of street scenes and drug squatter homes of Montreal recall the aimless and confused romp down Yonge in Don Shebib’s Goin’ Down The Road. But surprise! When a plot of sorts starts to coalesce within the film, several interesting things, from feminism to genre subversion, start to click into place.

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Rob Zombie Can Get Your Carpet Clean

    0

    I‘ve been staring at a blank screen for the past five minutes and hardly any puns or witty comments spring to mind. The ones that do are painfully obvious. So I’ll just lay it out on the line. Rob Zombie is now doing Woolite commercials. Sounds like a bit of a stretch right? Zombie directing some blonde housewife as she shakes her head with a knowing smile while her 8 year old son runs through the living room with muddy shoes chasing a cocker spaniel. She’s got it covered with Woolite right? Well, not exactly.

    Despite what some may deem “selling out,” this is still Rob Zombie we’re talking about here. I’m sure this is something that will be the talk of the town over the weekend. To me, Woolite seems to be taking a bit of a risk with this one and I’ll be surprised if this ad shows up during a break from “The Price is Right” or “General Hospital.” But we shall see. Thankfully, you won’t have to sit through daytime television to see the commercial. The Tubes of You have us covered.

    Check it out… the commercial is tucked under the seat.

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Cannes says Lars Von Trier “Can’t” and bans him from the Festival

    44

     

    After watching the hilariously awkward press conference for Lars von Trier’s Cannes competition film, Melancholia (all 38 minutes are here), one can see the awkward position the festival is in. One one had, the Cannes festival is one of the last bastions of unfettered free speech slash freedom of expression. Despite this clearly it is the case of an awkward auteur who had no interest in engaging with the world press (of whom, other than Bruce Kirkland, did not seem to ask much of anything of interest considering the prestige of the festival.) On the other hand, the world is still very sensitive to jokes made about the state of Israel, Hitler, and the Nazi parties final solution of WWII, which von Trier fumblingly delivered during the press conference (and this after announcing, tongue in cheek, that his next film will be a 3 hour porn film starring his Melancholia leads, Charlotte Gainsbourg and Kristen Dunst) before realizing how deep he dug himself and pleading, “How do I get myself out of this sentence?”

    So, Cannes has taken the hammer approach and booted Lars von Trier out of the festival (his film gets to stay in competition) whilst declaring him a persona non grata, despite his apology after the fact. Outside his films (and many would argue within his films) the crazy Dane has always been a bull in a china shop. Why bag on the man for being who he is? Clearly he isn’t as serious as the world would have him be. For the record, I am a big fan of the director’s particular brand of cinema, and all the controversy, infamy and bluntness he brings to the table. I know that festivals need their dog and pony shows, but discriminating cinephiles are (hopefully) wise enough to let the films speak for themselves, and find these types of press conferences about as vulgar as explaining-in-detail a good joke. A joke that the worlds largest and most prestigious festival just supplied an even bigger punchline too. Censoring their own position on freedom of expression while purporting an adherence to those principles. Who is the Nazi now?

    Either way, well played Mr. Trier for keeping Cannes amusing to those of us (by making an ass of yourself in public for our entertainment) thousands of miles away.

  • Trailer: Juan Carlos Fresnadillo’s Intruders

    0

     
     

    At the risk of restarting the favourite debate around here on what film is better, 28 Days Later or 28 Weeks Later – regulars around here will be well aware that I am in the Weeks camp – almost entirely due to the direction and intensity of Juan Carlos Fresnadillo. (see also: Intacto) While i’m less interested in him taking the helm at rebooting The Crow franchise, I have a treat today in the form of this latest film which has the stacked cast of Clive Owen, Daniel Bruehl, Kerry Fox and Carice van Houten. All exceptionally talented character actors who occasionally get star turns. The film is a supernatural thriller involving parents passing their own personal fears (demons if you will) down to their young children. Knowing Fresnadillo’s talent for atmosphere and visual flair, seeing him do an Exorcist type movie has me chomping at the bit. Intruders is now one of the most anticipated genre films of the year!

    In Madrid, a young boy’s nightmares have led his mother to seek guidance from a priest. In London, a young girl’s nightmares have led her parents to consult a psychologist. Both are linked by visions of a sinister intruder in their homes with designs on the children.

    The trailer is tucked under the seat.

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Director’s Club Podcast [Pedro Almodóvar]

    1

    Over at the Drectors Club Podcast this weekend I had the distinct pleasure of hanging out with Jim and Patrick as we dove into the still underrated works of Pedro Almodóvar.

    While we focused mainly on his Oscar winning production of All About My Mother and the arguable fan favorite, Talk to Her, we took enough time to dig a little deeper into the filmography and talk about Pedro’s career as a whole – which as we found out is much easier.

    So if you haven’t got your fix for podcasts this week, definitely stop over there for some Almodóvar chat as well as some other recent watches and answering listener emails. Thanks guy, it was a lot of fun! See you this summer after Contagion hits theaters for some Soderbergh chat?

    If you’d like more on Almodóvar, you can check out my mini-marathon that is technically still on-going.
     

     
     

  • March Madness: Director’s Cut [and the winner is...]

    4

    That is it. That. Is. It! By only ONE vote, the master of suspense takes down Akira Kurosawa. It must’ve been my initial vote that turned the tide. But Alfred Hitchcock has won this year’s director’s tournament.

    Thanks to everyone who played and it was a fun little mind distractor while it lasted. I’m sure we’ll be back in the not too distant future with something similar, until then have fun with whatever commentary you might have on this little experiment of ours and be sure to check out the final brackets and rub your eyes in disbelief at some of the upsets that occurred.

     
    See the FULL BRACKET
    See the CONSOLATION BRACKET

     
     

  • March Madness: Director’s Cut [FINAL ROUND]

    8

    This one is for all the marbles. Welcome to the FINAL ROUND of the RowThree March Madness pool! The four divisions of contenders have been eliminated and now only two stand. It’s up to you to decide who will take home the big trophy. This poll will remain open for about 24 hours. There can be only one victor. (Note: there was a fifth set of brackets we called the Consolation Division – a group of 16 directors we really wanted to see compete but weren’t quite “worthy” of the big dance. This round is now over – you can see the results below).

    Not much to say here. It’s Kurosawa vs. Hitchcock. May the best man win!

     

    SCHEDULE (begins – ends):
    Round 1: 3/9 – 3/13  
    Round 2: 3/14 – 3/18
    Round 3: 3/19 – 3/23
    Round 4: 3/24 – 3/27
    Round 5: 3/28 – 3/30
    Round 6: 3/31 – 4/1

    See the FULL BRACKET
    See the CONSOLATION BRACKET

    The same rules from round one still apply:
    show

     

     
     

  • March Madness: Director’s Cut [THE FINAL FOUR!]

    21

    Welcome to The Final Four (ROUND FIVE) of the RowThree March Madness pool! The four divisions of contenders have finally come together looking to advance to the championship game. It’s up to you to decide who advances. Look through each bracket within all five divisions and make your choice. After a few days the polls will close and we’ll see who advances to the next round. There can be only one victor. (Note: there is a fifth set of brackets we’re calling the Consolation Division – a group of 16 directors we really wanted to see compete but weren’t quite “worthy” of the big dance. This round is now over – see the results below).

    We’re down to The Final Four(!) and the divisions finally meet up to clash it out. As expected it’s all of our number one seeds competing for the title of champion. What wasn’t expected (at least by me) was the fact that voting has actually gotten easier as subsequent rounds ensue. That said, who do you pick now? Kurosawa or Tarantino? Are you going with the master pioneer or the talented “rip-off” artist? Do you vote for the master of suspense and thrills or Billy Wilder and his status as Hollywood’s “Golden” boy? No pick is right and no pick is wrong; you just gotta go with your gut.

    And it’s all over in the consolation division and the Queen’s royal touch seems to have paid off for Sir Ridley Scott as he beat out all of the competition, including the likes of Mike Leigh, Wes Craven, Sam Raimi and Joel Schumacher among others, to take home the NIT trophy. So congratulations Mr. Scott – now go make a good movie!

     

    SCHEDULE (begins – ends):
    Round 1: 3/9 – 3/13  
    Round 2: 3/14 – 3/18
    Round 3: 3/19 – 3/23
    Round 4: 3/24 – 3/27
    Round 5: 3/28 – 3/30
    Round 6: 3/31 – 4/1

    See the FULL BRACKET
    See the CONSOLATION BRACKET

    The same rules from round one still apply:
    show

     

     
     

  • March Madness: Director’s Cut [ROUND FOUR]

    13

    Welcome to ROUND FOUR of the RowThree March Madness pool! We’ve got four divisions of contenders looking to advance to the next round (Note: there is a fifth set of brackets we’re calling the Consolation Division – a group of 16 directors we really wanted to see compete but weren’t quite “worthy” of the big dance). It’s up to you to decide who advances. Look through each bracket within all five divisions and make your choice. After a few days the polls will close and we’ll see who advances to the next round. There can be only one victor.

    And the road to the Final Four continues… All of our #1 seeds have made it to the great eight. Not a single one was upset. But surprisingly only one #2 seed will be in competition. There’s not a lot to say that hasn’t already been said in recent days. There have been a lot of prediction as to who will take home the big trophy but I think at this point it’s pretty much anyone’s game. Keep sounding off on your horse to win.

    The consolation division doesn’t look all that much different. Sir Ridley Scott in the number one position continues to gobble up the competition. And since he’s not going to be facing anyone higher than the 6th seed, it looks like he may have it all wrapped up. So this is round is for all the marbles in the NIT. Does Brian DePalma have enough left in the tank to bring it home? It’s up to you…

     

    SCHEDULE (begins – ends):
    Round 1: 3/9 – 3/13  
    Round 2: 3/14 – 3/18
    Round 3: 3/19 – 3/23
    Round 4: 3/24 – 3/27
    Round 5: 3/28 – 3/30
    Round 6: 3/31 – 4/1

    See the FULL BRACKET
    See the CONSOLATION BRACKET

    The same rules from round one still apply:
    show

     

     
     

  • Polanski’s “Carnage” Looms Ever Nearer

    4

    Everyone’s most anticipated film of the year seems to unanimously be Terrence Malick’s The Tree of Life. While I too can hardly stand the wait, it comes at a distant second to Polanski’s latest, destined to be a classic, Carnage starring Jodi Foster, John C. Reilly, Christoph Waltz and Kate Winslet. How anyone can not be absolutely stoked for that line-up is beyond me. The above image doesn’t give much but at least we see the cast in action.

    The film focuses on two couple coming together to talk about the behavior of their children. As the night wears on, things become quite heated. The story is based off of a Tony Award winning stage play by Yasmina Reza of which I personally know nothing about. Sounds a bit like Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolfe? but is apparently a bit more on the humorous side. The film’s run time is about 105 minutes and all in real time. So 105 sequential minutes of our lives equals 105 sequential minutes of the character’s lives (kind of like “24″).

    Looks like probably a late 2011 release for this one and if Polanski is allowed in Canada there’s a good chance there will be a director Q&A at the very likely screening at TIFF. Which also means Andrew James will be in Toronto that week and shelling out whatever it takes to be there. Here are a couple of more photos…

     
     

  • March Madness: Director’s Cut [ROUND THREE]

    41

    Welcome to ROUND THREE of the RowThree March Madness pool! We’ve got four divisions of contenders looking to advance to the next round (Note: there is a fifth set of brackets we’re calling the Consolation Division – a group of 16 directors we really wanted to see compete but weren’t quite “worthy” of the big dance). It’s up to you to decide who advances. Look through each bracket within all five divisions and make your choice. After a few days the polls will close and we’ll see who advances to the next round. There can be only one victor.

    So a funny world we live in. In this round we’ve got the battle of the Stevens, the battle of the Fords and the battle of the Davids. And over in our foreign bracket, we’ve got four very different countries vying for glory. Once again not too many huge surprises in the previous round. It’s a little disheartening to see the Coen Brothers get bounced out so quickly (though only bya very narrow margin of 43-40). But I guess when you’re going up against the #1 seed in The Master of Suspense you’ve gotta count your blessings that you’re even hanging close.

    Over in the NIT division things are a bit more interesting. Somehow Brian DePalma managed to take out Mike Nichols in a ridiculous display of film making. Meanwhile, Frears fought the good fight but couldn’t get out from under the death grip of Mr. George Romero. It will be interesting to see what becomes of the Ridley Scott/Michael Mann match-up. Both team have their enemies, but both have some classics under their belts as well.

    We draw ever closer to the final four! Enjoy and let the voting continue…

     

    SCHEDULE (begins – ends):
    Round 1: 3/9 – 3/13  
    Round 2: 3/14 – 3/18
    Round 3: 3/19 – 3/23
    Round 4: 3/24 – 3/27
    Round 5: 3/28 – 3/30
    Round 6: 3/31 – 4/1

    See the FULL BRACKET
    See the CONSOLATION BRACKET

    The same rules from round one still apply:
    show

     

     
     

Page 3 of 10«12345»...Last »