Archive for the ‘Directors’ Category

  • Review: Les Dames du Bois de Boulogne (1945)

    4

    [Starting Thursday, February 9th, Toronto's TIFF Bell Lightbox will be presenting a retrospective of French master Robert Bresson's films entitled The Poetry of Precision: The Films of Robert Bresson. To celebrate the event, here is a review of Bresson's second film, which will be playing at the Lightbox on February 23rd and March 5th.]

    Here, in Les Dames du Bois de Boulogne, is a story that might have been given an unsatisfactory treatment, like so much melodramatic drivel, and instead is carefully invested with some actual weight. Each of the central characters and their concerns are represented with an admirable amount of depth and conviction, elevating the narrative to nearly grand proportions. This shows how, even at just his second feature film, Robert Bresson had a firm grasp on his craft. That craft would eventually grow into a singular, pure style far more severe than what he uses here, yet Les Dames still certainly deserves recognition as a notable (and entertaining) entry in the great filmmaker’s body of work.

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Review: Breaking the Waves (1996)

    0

    With 1996’s Breaking the Waves, Lars von Trier made his first proper venture into the territories of female martyrdom and suffering that he would become so well known for. It features one of his most memorable characters: Bess McNeill (Emily Watson in a one-of-a-kind performance), a child-like young woman who lives with her mother (Sandra Voe) and sister Dorothy (Katrin Cartlidge) in an isolated coastal community in Scotland. At the start of the film, she gets married to Jan (Stellan Skarsgård), who works on an offshore oilrig. Their early days together are happy ones, but he soon returns to the rig to continue his work, plunging the fiercely affectionate Bess into sadness. Then disaster strikes when an accident leaves Jan paralyzed. After a period of slow healing and depression, he makes an unusual request of her: Bess is to pursue sexual encounters with other men and tell him about them as a sad substitute for the moments of carnal bliss they once shared together. With difficulty, Bess complies, leading to tragic consequences in her relationships with Jan, her family, the town and God.
    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Review: Europa (1991)

    7

    Being the third and final film in Lars von Trier’s Europa trilogy, Europa occupies quite a pivotal place in the Danish director’s career. At the time, it was his most thematically and stylistically ambitious achievement, escalating his ongoing study of European society to impressive new heights. At the Cannes Film Festival, it received no fewer than three awards, including one for “Special Artistic Contribution” – yet this didn’t keep von Trier from playing the sore loser when he didn’t get the Palme d’Or by calling Jury president Roman Polanski a midget. As if in response to this “loss,” von Trier then embarked on a new stage in his work, adopting the rougher, more emotionally lacerating approach seen in films like Breaking the Waves (1996), Dancer in the Dark (2000) and Dogville (2003) that he is perhaps best known for. This drastic shift makes Europa all the more fascinating as an exhilaratingly bold flirtation with large-scale filmmaking and outright spectacle.

    Jean-Marc Barr stars as Leopold Kessler, a naïve American who goes to Germany shortly after the end of World War II to work as a sleeping car conductor. Accompanied by his German uncle (Ernst-Hugo Järegård), he begins to socialize with the Hartmann family who run the Zentropa railway line. He becomes romantically involved with Katharina (Barbara Sukowa), daughter of the company’s owner, Max Hartmann (Jørgen Reenberg), while facing pressure from both an American colonel (Eddie Constantine) and the branch of Nazi supporters known as the Werewolves to aid their respective sides. Eventually, the non-committal Kessler is pushed to finally decide where his loyalties truly lie.
    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Review: Epidemic (1987)

    1

    For the second film in his Europa trilogy, Lars von Trier went in a noticeably different direction than the one he tread for his debut effort, The Element of Crime (1984), and the trilogy’s third film, Europa (1991). Both of these works are distinguished by their boldly stylized aesthetics and involving narratives, with Element providing a feverish, orange-tinted variation on the noir genre while Europa weaves a spellbinding tale of postwar Germany. In comparison, Epidemic (1987) feels completely different right from the start, with its sensibilities more rooted in documentary than fantasia – initially, at least.

    The film opens with the writer Niels Vørsel calling his creative partner Lars von Trier (the two men collaborated on the scripts for the Europa trilogy and the television miniseries The Kingdom, and here essentially play themselves) about their latest screenplay. Lars goes over to Niels’ place only to discover that the disc containing the script (entitled The Cop and the Whore, a cheeky nod to The Element of Crime) has been erased. Left with just a few days before they have to hand in their work to their producer, they scramble to write up a brand new script. They decide to create a new story about the spread of a deadly plague across the world and begin to conduct research and map out a plot. They make progress and see to other matters like a road trip to Germany while remaining unaware of an actual outbreak that is quietly making its way across Europe.
    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Lars von Trier: Discuss

    0

    With Melancholia opening this Friday in select cities, and a lot of Lars von Trier films showing in Toronto, the folks at the Substream with Mamo!‘s Matt Price have a new episode of Very Important Dudes and Dudettes in Film History (VIDADIFH), which brings out all the interesting contradictions and misconceptions of the worlds most famous Danish filmmaker; yes, budding filmatists, more than Carl Theodore Dreyer.

    Here is your chance to weigh in on the travel-phobic provocateur enfant terrible auteur tyrant film-guy. Ladies and Gentlemen: Mr. Lars von Trier

  • Rank ‘Em: Billy Wilder

    13

    Back when I was a mere baby film buff, Billy Wilder was probably one of the very first directors I learned to know by name and seek out his films (along with Alfred Hitchcock). I can’t really explain that, other than I just happened to introduce myself to Double Indemnity, The Lost Weekend, Sabrina, and more within a relatively short period of time when I was also becoming aware of “director” as a concept. In any case, I loved Wilder’s stuff because he could do massively entertaining and witty films in almost any genre – film noir, society comedy, romantic drama, social drama, biopic, absurd comedy, etc. Perhaps the only director of the time as versatile when it comes to genre was Howard Hawks. Meanwhile, Wilder and Preston Sturges were two of the pioneers of the writer-director paradigm, which was pretty rare in studio-era Hollywood. I just watched Billy Wilder’s A Foreign Affair for the first time last night, and that pretty much leaves Stalag 17 as the only major Wilder film I haven’t seen. I should probably wait to do this Rank ‘Em until I’ve seen that one, but whatever. I’m a rebel.

    All of these are written and directed by Wilder, except ones that have denote screenplay only. It would be wrong not to mention Wilder’s two long-term writing partners, Charles Brackett, with whom he worked on nearly every film from 1938 to 1950, and I.A.L. Diamond, who cowrote Wilder’s screenplays from 1957 through most of the rest of his career. Brackett’s departure from the team led to a bit more caustic cynicism in Wilder’s writing (see Ace in the Hole), though it had always been present. I will admit that I saw several of these a long LONG time ago and I’m going on my gut memories of them rather than specifics, so feel free to write angry comments about how wrong I am. There are at least a few perhaps surprisingly low placements.

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Survey: Bobcat Goldthwait

    0

    Although I should have brought this up on the Netflix segment for recent episode of the Cinecast, alas, I did not notice it until late last night: Bobcat Goldthwait‘s 1991 directorial debut, Shakes the Clown, popped up on the Canadian version of the streaming site this week. Goldthwait, as an onscreen performer peaked somewhere in the mid 1980s – most people probably know him as the weird, dirty (literally, not figuratively) Cop from the Police Academy sequels, but the cool kids probably fondly remember One Crazy Summer. he more or less disappeared after Shakes failed to take off beyond a weird cult curio. For about a decade he was MIA before returning as a director in the early 2000s for cable TV programs (Crank Yankers, Chapelle’s Show, The Man Show and Jimmy Kimmel Live) and eventually moving into smart, subversive indie features. With the quite fun, and rather timely, debut of the writer/director/comedian’s latest film, God Bless America (Kurt’s Review) and the fondness for his rather auteur-ish three-word-title laden C.V. (Windy City Heat, Sleeping Dogs Lie, World’s Greatest Dad, God Bless America.) Regular listeners of the Cinecast, know that Matt Gamble raves about World’s Greatest Dad often, and at length.

    Want an overview? Lots video clippings are tucked under the seat.
    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Inside Llewyn Davis: The Next Film from The Brothers Coen

    7

    I know I am not the only one excited to know what the next film from Joel and Ethan Coen will be. They have scripted the Michael Hoffman (The Last Station) helmed remake of Gambit; that according to IMDB is currently in post-production. The next project that they will be both directing and writing may at first seem a tad peculiar amongst the rest of the Brothers’ filmography. That very project is an adaptation of Dave Van Ronk’s memoir The Mayor of MacDougal Street.

    It was back in June during the opening of the Elinor Bunin Munroe Film Center, a new facility erected on behalf of The Film Society of Lincoln Center, that the Coens first made allusions to this new venture. As they sat alongside Noah Baumbach in a discussion of their films’ openings mentions were made of a script in progress that will feature naturalistic dialogue, a lot single instrument-music performances to be recorded live on set, and extreme attention to capture the feel of a specific time and place. That time and place will be no other than New York City’s Greenwich Village during the ’60s, the epicenter of the folk music revival scene which spawned Bob Dylan, Joni Mitchell,and Phil Ochs to name a few. Dave Van Ronk was a friendly staple of the Village, and noted as a major influence of the sound which defined many of the performers who came out of there with a blend of blues style, and complex harmonies.

    Variety announced this week that StudioCanal will co-finance the film. In addition, Scott Rudin will produce while Robert Graf will act as Executive Producer – the same positions they filled on No Country for Old Men and True Grit. It was also revealed that the film will now be called Inside Llewyn Davis. This can surely be seen as an indicator that this won’t be a direct adaptation. In a recent interview with frequent Coen-collaborator Roger Deakins, the master cinematographer spoke of a film he was going to shoot in a style emulating the work of D.A. Pennebaker. If I was the sort of lad who liked to place bets, Inside Llewyn Davis is that movie. This is interesting on a number of levels. Other than the opportunity for bold characters this (at least to me) wouldn’t seem like obvious Coen fare. The stylistic details that have been mentioned have writers around the net making Robert Altman comparisons. Joel and Ethan themselves regarded to Baumbach at the Lincoln Center function that it would be something he would do. It would definitely seem as if they want move away from the sensibility we all know them for as their remake of True Grit, while no doubt having some Coen flourishes, still seems quite restrained in the light of their other work even compared with something like Miller’s Crossing. Not to in any way imply that is indicative of quality. Another aspect of this is how cool it will to see a movie within this world. The Village-Folk scene has really only been touched upon in light of Dylan as in Todd Haynes’ I’m Not There and Scorsese’s documentary No Direction Home. I am a sucker for music films, and even more fascinated when they attempt to embody a particular scene itself. Well, I am already there. The Coen Brothers could make a movie based on Swedish Fish, and my tickets already bought. Your thoughts, the Third Row?

     

  • Rank ‘em: David Lynch Films

    16

    Years back I took a chance at the DVD store and bought a certain film by director David Lynch (I don’t wanna give away which one just yet as it’s number 1 on my list). From then on I was a die hard Lynch fan. I sought out every other film he has ever made and have since watched them all multiple times (some more than others). One of the masters of weird and surreal American cinema, I find even when one of his films perhaps doesn’t work as a whole, there’s always something interesting to experience. He is possibly my favorite director at this point in time.

    Below is my ranking of all 10 David Lynch films, not including shorts, TV shows (sorry, Twin Peaks, as much as I love ya’) and anything else that isn’t a full-length feature film. Mind you this is going by my mood at this particular moment, and the list could change half an hour from now. For kicks I’ve included a moment/scene to highlight each film (spoilers lay within).

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • DVD Review: HIGH (1967)

    0

     

    A fortunate encounter at this years edition of Fantasia has led me to a treasure trove of Larry Kent (Canada’s godfather of indie and counterculture cinema who has been active from the early sixties right up to two new films in the past 4 years) DVDs which I will be exploring over the next couple weeks. The kick-off is the drug psychedelic kill-trip that pre-dates Natural Born Killers and The Doom Generation by several decades: 1967′s HIGH.

    Tom is a college drop-out who keeps his sex and drug fuelled lifestyle going by playing gigolo to older women (and stealing their husbands credit cards, post-coitus), selling oregano to undiscriminating acquaintances, while keeping the good ganja for himself, and otherwise confidently hustling his way in and out of situations. He is somewhat of a cross between Breathless-era Jean-Paul Belmondo and Fritz the Cat, who may or may not have a few bastard children scattered about his stomping grounds of late sixties Montreal. His femme-du-jour, Vicky, may on occasion, pester him about ‘the future’ but for now – and in the now – she has no issues about getting down in an impromptu, casual three-way with her roommate under marijuana-laden red-filter cinematography. One of the films best scenes (and one of several sex scenes) has the contrast so low that you can only make out hats and hair: an animated tangle of long locks AND short pubes. Tom’s recent score of a Finnish Diplomat’s Charge-Ex card leads to a getaway weekend consisting of airports, 5-Star hotels, upscale city eateries and romping around in the fountains and shops along Kings St. in Toronto. Upon the couples return to Montreal, there is a desire for a little more of the good life, obtained the easy way. Before you can say, “Live fast, die young, and leave a good looking corpse,” director Larry Kent has (whether intentionally or not) changed the rules of the criminal youth on the run genre before they have even been fully fleshed out. Both Bonnie and Clyde and High at the time were playing festivals simultaneously, and while the latter doesn’t have the caliber of actors featured in the former, or the technical resources for that matter, it makes up for it with the tools of the indie filmmaker, a veneer of exploitation and lot of pluck. Supposedly, Warren Beatty was a big fan when both films played alongside one another in the Montreal International Film Festival in ’67.

    For someone born in the 1970s, I have to wonder how High was received at the time of its release, beyond the simple factual history of its censoring and banning by the Quebec government. Sporting a psychedelic soundtrack, an in-the-moment vibe that seems to celebrate and condemn the free-loving hippie life-style and straddling the divide of a porn peep show and a Canadian riff on European arthouse of the day. With the French Nouvelle Vague in full swing in arthouse circles, Jack Smith on the experimental film/theatre side of things in New York, and the Summer of Love writ large in popular culture of the time, High seems to exist right middle of all these things while still being its own vérité beast. Viewing a film like this 40+ years after its release it can on one hand be considered a fascinating cultural document, on the other hard to disentangle from trends and fads of the day. Cinematic capture of street scenes and drug squatter homes of Montreal recall the aimless and confused romp down Yonge in Don Shebib’s Goin’ Down The Road. But surprise! When a plot of sorts starts to coalesce within the film, several interesting things, from feminism to genre subversion, start to click into place.

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Rob Zombie Can Get Your Carpet Clean

    0

    I‘ve been staring at a blank screen for the past five minutes and hardly any puns or witty comments spring to mind. The ones that do are painfully obvious. So I’ll just lay it out on the line. Rob Zombie is now doing Woolite commercials. Sounds like a bit of a stretch right? Zombie directing some blonde housewife as she shakes her head with a knowing smile while her 8 year old son runs through the living room with muddy shoes chasing a cocker spaniel. She’s got it covered with Woolite right? Well, not exactly.

    Despite what some may deem “selling out,” this is still Rob Zombie we’re talking about here. I’m sure this is something that will be the talk of the town over the weekend. To me, Woolite seems to be taking a bit of a risk with this one and I’ll be surprised if this ad shows up during a break from “The Price is Right” or “General Hospital.” But we shall see. Thankfully, you won’t have to sit through daytime television to see the commercial. The Tubes of You have us covered.

    Check it out… the commercial is tucked under the seat.

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Cannes says Lars Von Trier “Can’t” and bans him from the Festival

    44

     

    After watching the hilariously awkward press conference for Lars von Trier’s Cannes competition film, Melancholia (all 38 minutes are here), one can see the awkward position the festival is in. One one had, the Cannes festival is one of the last bastions of unfettered free speech slash freedom of expression. Despite this clearly it is the case of an awkward auteur who had no interest in engaging with the world press (of whom, other than Bruce Kirkland, did not seem to ask much of anything of interest considering the prestige of the festival.) On the other hand, the world is still very sensitive to jokes made about the state of Israel, Hitler, and the Nazi parties final solution of WWII, which von Trier fumblingly delivered during the press conference (and this after announcing, tongue in cheek, that his next film will be a 3 hour porn film starring his Melancholia leads, Charlotte Gainsbourg and Kristen Dunst) before realizing how deep he dug himself and pleading, “How do I get myself out of this sentence?”

    So, Cannes has taken the hammer approach and booted Lars von Trier out of the festival (his film gets to stay in competition) whilst declaring him a persona non grata, despite his apology after the fact. Outside his films (and many would argue within his films) the crazy Dane has always been a bull in a china shop. Why bag on the man for being who he is? Clearly he isn’t as serious as the world would have him be. For the record, I am a big fan of the director’s particular brand of cinema, and all the controversy, infamy and bluntness he brings to the table. I know that festivals need their dog and pony shows, but discriminating cinephiles are (hopefully) wise enough to let the films speak for themselves, and find these types of press conferences about as vulgar as explaining-in-detail a good joke. A joke that the worlds largest and most prestigious festival just supplied an even bigger punchline too. Censoring their own position on freedom of expression while purporting an adherence to those principles. Who is the Nazi now?

    Either way, well played Mr. Trier for keeping Cannes amusing to those of us (by making an ass of yourself in public for our entertainment) thousands of miles away.

Page 1 of 912345»...Last »