• A Month Of Horror 2012 – Chapter 2

    NightmareOnElmStreet4_4

    .
    Freddy is checking you out…

     

    A Nightmare On Elm Street 4: The Dream Master (1988 – Renny Harlin)
    Seriously though, that above image is one of the reasons I could never quite get into the Elm Street movies as horror – there’s certainly some nightmarish scenarios, but they’re always cut by one of Freddy’s witticisms or by an overabundance of silly. That doesn’t mean they can’t be entertaining though: the first is fine, the second would be a hoot if you watched it with a roomful of drunken smartasses and the third is actually quite fun of its own accord (e.g. Dick Cavett attacks Zsa Zsa Gabor on TV). I find the Freddy character himself kind of tiring, but there’s typically been some inventiveness in the dream sequences despite their cheesiness. The fourth go around stays true to that form. Though it takes itself a bit more serious than number three, there’s still a lot of goofy mixed in with some clever moments. Once again, I never felt any sense of dread during the dreams, but I can forgive the films that. They do tend to side on the gross and goopy when it comes to some of the visuals, but the effects (at least in the first four) are mostly of the old school variety so there’s a lot of craft involved. This one brings back three characters that remained at the end of number three (though a different actress – Tuesday Knight – takes on Patricia Arquette’s role of Kristen) and gives it a bit more of that late 80s look and feel to things. That’s not always a good thing (some of the music is far more frightening than a slash across the face from Freddy’s hand), but it’s actually a fine little time capsule. And Harlin keeps the whole thing moving. My guess is the series starts to plummet from here on out (though apparently New Nightmare is solid).

    NightmareOnElmStreet4_2
    NightmareOnElmStreet4_3
    NightmareOnElmStreet4_5

     

    Friday The 13th: The Final Chapter (1984 – Joseph Zito)
    For most of this fourth installment of Jason Voorhees’ story, things feel right in line with the two previous parts – there’s a scenario that brings young people to the backwoods for their partying at which point Jason finds out and starts dismantling them in a variety of painful ways. Both Crispin Glover and Corey Feldman are amongst the cast this time out and the acting level from most everyone just feels a bit stronger. The same music and tch-tch-tch sound effects are used just as effectively again, so everything is working pretty well. And then that ending…Wow. First of all, they kinda rush through some of the final deaths (handling several off screen – to an extent that you aren’t even sure if some of them are dead) and the final chase feels like it was handled by a different director with some odd pauses and blocking. But then they decide to go all bat-shit crazy for the final killing and, even though much of it makes no sense, all is pretty much forgiven because they just WENT for it. They got a little sloppy getting to it, but they certainly gave you value once it arrived. And they even managed to set up a sequel without necessarily betraying the film’s title – though I haven’t yet seen the fifth one to determine if they held true to it. I may put that verification on hold for awhile – it’s been fun, but I need to mix it up a bit more.

    Friday13thPart4_2
    Friday13thPart4_4
    Friday13thPart4_5


     

    Die, Monster, Die! (1965 – Daniel Haller)
    A young American lands in a small British village looking for his girlfriend (that he met in the U.S. while studying “science” at university), but no one wants to help him get to her house. Not even for money. He eventually makes it there as he crosses dead looking landscapes and sneaks past the locked gate and immediately runs into…Boris Karloff! Karloff plays her father and he warns the young man not to stay. As we spend more time in this gothic looking mansion with creaky doors and a dungeon like basement (and an oddly glowing greehouse), we start hearing about some of the mysteries of the estate. Her grandfather went insane, her dad looks to be on a similar path, her mother has a recent illness that forces her to avoid light, a maid has gone missing and the butler is getting weaker by the moment. Could it all have anything to do with a large green rock that fell from the sky decades ago? A bit spooky, a couple of jumps here and there and a few great images all add up to a fine little mid-60s horror. Also, the way Karloff scoffs out the word “science” is classic. The first half of one of those great MGM “Midnite Movies” double features DVDs. The second half being…

    DieMonsterDie2
    DieMonsterDie3
    DieMonsterDie4

     

    The Dunwich Horror (1970 – Daniel Haller)
    Before his many years of directing in TV (episodes across 40+ different shows and TV movies), Daniel Haller was yet another of the many “led astray” by Roger Corman. He worked as art director on about 30 different films for Corman and then took the directing reins for 6 films between ’65-’70. Starting with the solid but reasonably small scope Die, Monster, Die!, he bookended his film directing career with The Dunwich Horror – a top notch occult thriller starring Dean Stockwell, Sandra Dee and Ed Begley. Dee is quite natural and low key in her performance, but it stands apart from the others like Stockwell and Begley who raise the stakes just a wee bit more and occasionally play for the folks in the back row. What sets this apart from many of the other “bring the dark lord back” films is Haller and his editor. The shot composition is always well selected and adds to both the mystery as well as the off-kilter sense while the editing (particularly one of the best little jump scares I’ve seen done without a single bit of music – just quick jump cut to a quick zoom with a minimal gasp from one of the characters) is creative and throws in some tricks during the drug-induced dream sequences Dee undergoes as Stockwell tries to do with her what his grandfather failed to accomplish. During his own ceremonial childbirth, a twin brother supposedly died, but there’s something in the upstairs room that’s just itching to get out – and when it does, as one resident of Dunwich says, “all Hell breaks loose.”. Some of the dreams and ceremony mumbo-jumbo runs a bit long, but this brought more than one smile to my face during a few tense moments.

    TheDunwichHorror2
    TheDunwichHorror5
    TheDunwichHorror7

    Tags: , , , ,

9 Comments


  1. Kurt says:

    HUGE fan of THE NEW NIGHTMARE, it’s the proto-SCREAM film, all the elements and self-reflexive stuff is in there.

  2. Voncaster says:

    I dislike New Nightmare a lot. In my mind its the equivalent of Ridley Scott coming back to the Alien movies with Alien 4 and in Alien 4 he declares all previous movies to be just movies. Sigorney Weaver is not Ripley she is just an actress. The Xenomorph is not a frightening monster its merely a costumed guy.

    The only reason Wes Craven can do what he did with New Nightmare is because Nightmare had been so watered down with so many sub par installments that no one cared what he did with the fiction. As a fan of the NOES series, I found that direction troubling. It basically writes off all the other movies.

    In my mind its the other way around. All the prior NOES movies exist and New Nightmare is some alt universe that I don’t care to revisit.

    • Kurt says:

      It works with this franchise, because the franchise was always just theatre, even the first one is as silly as it is scary. There is an element of self-awareness on the periphery of Nightmare on Elm St. from the first part all the way up to putting a flourish on it, with The New Nightmare. I dig it.

      • Jonathan says:

        The first was far more scary than fun. It seemed to pick up the zaniness afterwards. I like New Nightmare and hate it both at the same time. The self-awareness was bizarre and original when I first saw it, but it does play out very strangely, almost like fan fiction, in context with the franchise.

        • I dunno, when I watched the first NOES last year for the first time, I found it far more silly/funny than scary. It has some creepy stuff for sure, but like when the one girl’s getting attacked in her bedroom and blood is getting sprayed EVERYWHERE and her boyfriend is just like “Whaaaaa?!” – I totally cracked up. Maybe it’s just because I saw them AFTER having seen Scream and Scary Movie and later slasher films, but I didn’t think any of the initial major slasher series films (NOES, Halloween, Friday the 13th) were that scary when I saw them last October. I haven’t seen any later entries in any of the franchises.

          • Bob Turnbull says:

            The first Nightmare film also struck me as more silly than anything (gross and gruesome too, but mostly due to the goo…). The second is ridiculous and I pretty much bailed from the series until someone convinced me to return for the third – which is great fun and finds the right way to incorporate “I can’t believe I just saw that” into the series. The fourth is close to the third, but takes things a bit more seriously at times – still fun.

            I guess it’s because Halloween was one of the first horrors I saw many moons ago that I’m still surprised when someone says it didn’t do much for them – especially on the fright side. Granted many of the tropes other movies borrowed from it (and precursors) are probably a bit tired, so they don’t hit as much, but I still think the sustained tension in the last section of the movie is genuinely impressive on any scale.

            • Halloween was scarier than the other two, for sure (the others I enjoyed on a much more campy level), but it was like every scene I knew exactly where and when he was going to show up, so none of the things that should’ve been chills/jump scares hit for me. The one I liked best was when he sort of materialized in a dark doorway behind her, mostly just because I like the “slow appearance” approach visually. I know if I’d seen it before seeing all the imitations and parodies, it would’ve creeped me out a lot more. It’s hard to mentally correct for that, especially with horror films, I think.

  3. Bob Turnbull says:

    I’m both intrigued and concerned about your comments Voncaster…I probably should work my way through the rest of the NoES films before getting to NN though, and I’m not sure that’s gonna happen this month…

    • Voncaster says:

      I’m convinced the reason there is no fan outrage is because NOES basically eroded its own fan base to the point where no cared (See also Halloween and F13).

      NOES is a classic horror movie. Great premise, great direction, great sound design, and great kills. To write the original and sequels with the involvement of Craven has always been troubling to me. I like Wes Craven, but I really hate NN.

Leave a comment