• Review: Let Me In

    Met Me In One Sheet

    Director: Matt Reeves (Cloverfield)
    Screenplay: Matt Reeves, John Ajvide Lindqvist (novel)
    Producers: Alexander Yves Brunner, Guy East, Donna Gigliotti, Carl Molinder, John Nordling, Simon Oakes, Nigel Sinclair
    Starring: Kodi Smit-McPhee, Chloe Moretz, Richard Jenkins, Elias Koteas
    MPAA Rating: R
    Running time: 116 min.


    It’s not too surprising that a movie shrouded in so much drama nearly came and went in the blink of an eye. Mind you, the subject matter is such that even without the subtitles, Let Me In was bound to have limited appeal. But the question remains: how does Cloverfield director Matt Reeve’s take on John Ajvide Lindqvist’s novel and Tomas Alfredson’s film stack up with the universally loved (in these parts particularly) Let the Right One In (review)?

    Let Me In Movie StillIt’s an unfair question, one that won’t do justice to either film and for that reason, the comparisons end right here. Reeves’ film stands superbly on its own as one of the great unseen gems of 2010 and is definitely a contender for one of the better films of the year if not one of the best looking ones. Bringing Australian cinematographer Greig Fraser (Spider, Bright Star) was definitely a good decision and Fraser manages to capture Let Me In in the cold winter of New Mexico so that it looks both frigidly cold and still warm and inviting. Soft lighting (for the most part – except when Abby’s in “vamp mode” which is a nice touch) welcomes us into the little community where things go seriously wrong for Abby before they go right.

    The setting and mood is effectively accented by Oscar winner Michael Giacchino’s score which is beautiful, haunting and sometimes downright terrifying. He’s taken a few queues from Elliot Goldenthal’s Interview with a Vampire score and makes it work for this modern vampire tale.


    Let Me In Movie StillReeves’ film, as required by the story, lives or dies by the leads and asking children to take on roles this demanding and let’s face it, disturbing, is no easy task but both Chloe Moretz and Kodi Smit-McPhee do a fantastic job of their characters, particularly McPhee who has the same wide eyed look of innocence and hard resolve that Kåre Hedebrant brought to his version of the role. Moretz is also quite good but she’s a bit too pretty and clean and she doesn’t have the supernatural je ne sais quoi that Lina Leandersson did but her performance is good and turns a little distanced and cold towards the latter part of the story, a subtle shift that works to her benefit. Also worth mentioning are Richard Jenkins and Elias Koteas who give good performances in small supporting roles.

    My one complaint about Reeves’ film are the effects which feel awkward. Admittedly, that’s the point since Abby isn’t supposed to move like a human when she’s feeding but they’re a little too fake and obviously CGI. Reeves must realize this because he keeps the camera far from the action in these instances and it’s mostly shadows moving which helps alleviate the problem – guess the money went into Abby’s vampire makeup which is effectively creepy.

    It certainly shares a few things with Alfredson’s film, a given considering they’re both adapted from the same source material, but Reeves’ Let Me In is an excellent adaptation and yes, a worthy companion to the original and a great example of a re-make that works.


    Click “play” to see the trailer:

    Links:
    IMDb profile
    Official Website
    Flixster Profile for Let Me In

7 Comments


  1. Mad Hatter says:

    I’m still confounded by why this film did so poorly at the box office. My only guess is that it wasn’t marketed well enough to those who didn’t already know about it, and unfortuantely boycotted by those who did.

    I’m with you though – on it’s own, this is a solid, well executed film.

    • Andrew James says:

      I’m sure it is. Just like Funny Games (English) probably is as well. What it all kind of comes down to for me is just sort of a waste of time. Why spend ten bucks and three hours to go see a slightly inferior (by all accounts) version of a movie I’ve already seen when I have a stack of DVDs a mile high at home I’ve not seen yet?

  2. Marina Antunes says:

    @Andrew – because it’s NOT the same film you’ve seen. It stands on its own as an independent movie – even if you are familiar with the story. There are enough changes that it’s original. If you don’t want to see it, that’s fine but its unfair to peg it as the same movie which it’s not.

    @Mad Hatter – it might have something to do with the way they released it. At least in Vancouver, it played on limited screens for 2 weeks before moving to the rep cinema where it’s been for 2 weeks, this being the last of the run.

  3. Mad Hatter says:

    @ Andrew… In a way it’s like paying $15 to see a Jack White gig where he’ll be playing the setlist from the Radiohead concert you won last summer. Not originality running amok, but still worth a listen.

    @ Marina… Yeah, a similar fate befell the film here in Toronto. That’s what truly perplexes me: why bring the project this far just to short-sell it when it matters most?

    • Andrew James says:

      Hatter, not sure about that analogy. Jack White covering Radiohead would be extremely interesting. But Jack would take Radiohead and make it his own. Kid A coming out of an old telecaster and broken down amp would be awesome. So is no the case with this Vampire remake.

      I’d be interested in seeing Let the Right One remade if it was in a completely different style. Judging from the trailer and reviews from people I know (Kurt, FilmRot, FilmJunk, etc.) it’s not all that different than the one I saw last year. James at FilmRot said it’s almost the exact same movie with one or two small things changed just to say they changed something. And without seeing the movie, I’m inclined to believe him based on clips ( http://movieclips.com/sgBG-let-me-in-movie-you-have-to-hit-back/ ) and trailers I’ve seen.

      And like Sam said, it has a lot to do with time as well. A remake movie isn’t always worth it unless it’s vastly superior or completely different in some way. Look at A Woman, A Gun and a Noodle Shop. Now THAT’S a remake.

  4. Leyton Jay says:

    I loved Let Me In; tense, gritty, original and innovative. After the recent trend for stupid vampire/werewolf cross-overs and love-sick teenage tripe, this is very refreshing! I havent seen the original but I will definitely check it out soon,

    Here’s my review of Let Me In http://www.leytonjay.co.uk/let-me-in-my-review-no-spoilers. Cheers.

  5. rot says:

    count me among those that think Let Me In is actually better than the original

Leave a comment