Bookmarks for Feb. 4-9
09
Feb
2010

- Bruce McDonald talks about Trigger, This Movie Is Broken and a Hard Core Logo Sequel
“For many years we’ve been talking about doing a follow-up [to Hard Core Logo]. Hugh and Callum have both been super busy so we thought that while we were waiting — and waiting to see if Joe Dick comes back from the dead — we could take some of the minor characters from the first movie and put them in the foreground. So Bucky Haight, who is their mentor in the original, becomes one of the major characters. I become a major character, too — I play the filmmaker who filmed the onscreen suicide of the unfortunate Joe Dick and who’s wracked with guilt. Care Failure and her band Die Mannequin play themselves — they’re recording an album with Bucky and I’m documenting it. She’s been channeling the spirit of Joe Dick — he’s writing songs through her. It’s crazy but it’s essentially the story of them making a record in this old dancehall in northern Saskatchewan.” - Do Movies Matter Anymore? Steven Soderbergh Doesn’t See Any Evidence They Do
“It was odd to see people who allegedly are pro-cinema, kind of rooting against Che conceptually. Taking the position of why would somebody make a movie of this length and try and release it this way? My attitude is, well, why wouldn’t you encourage somebody to do something that’s out of the box? Whether you like the movie or not — you can not like the movie — but it was odd to see people slamming the idea of making it.” - The White Stripes: Under Great White Northern Lights [review]
It’s been a while (about 6 months actually), but Andrew finally got around to writing up a review for the rock doc showcasing The White Stripes tour about Canada. It’s over at the MorePop page - The Decade’s 30 Best Long Tail Films
Pretty much every movie related website on the Internet has come up with some sort of Best of the Decade list over the past month. But while the majority of them focused on straight up “Best of” lists, in the spirit of [Where The Long Tail Ends] that I would instead focus on the lesser known films that have been made over the past ten years.” - Is Avatar the Oscar Villain?
“Almost any good story has to have a great villain in order for it to work. And the best thing about the Oscars — because they’re so darn predictable these days — is the narrative. But we still need a villain, don’t we? For some people, Avatar is that villain. Right now the Oscar race is shaping up to be the two-billion-dollar-movie versus The Hurt Locker, a film that managed only $16 million … worldwide. The problem is this: Avatar is not the general audience’s villain and those are the people the Oscar telecast is hoping to pull in. On a superficial level, though, Avatar is a marvelous stand-in for Darth Vader. In a way, it reminds me of another imperial franchise, the New York Yankees.”
You can now take a look at RowThree’s bookmarks at any time of your choosing simply by clicking the “delicious” button in the upper right of the page. It looks remarkably similar to this:
This discussion currently has one response.










February 10, 2010
Soderbergh: “I guess the point of some art is to illuminate. I just don’t see any evidence that it’s happening. It happens for ten minutes and then everybody’s thinking about where they want to go eat.”
A-fucking-men.
I agree entirely with what he is saying, film has become disposable geek curiosity, people are preoccupied with the packaging and not the content. Movie blog culture has spurred this on because I believe movie blog culture is foremost movie geek culture (fetishizing the trees to the detriment of seeing the woods). I looked long and hard and I do not see much by way of approaching film as art discussion outside of the carcass of academic inquiry, and I find that just as misguided.
Its not just films that are disposable, art has become disposable, art has no meaning in this culture, and it has no meaning because, I suspect, there is so little time for introspection, we work long hours and fill our free time with distractions and there is nothing for the art to engage with anymore. the art requires something from its audience to work, but that audience is diminishing, and even those who can relate to it, are immersed in a culture that is missing the vocabulary to articulate it.
I am somewhat hopeful about the democratization of creative expression, and the attempts to overturn corporate copyright of our shared culture to create a healthy public domain for new generations to expand upon… its not the technology, its the cult of efficiency that I see as deadening us.
I say this as someone subsumed by the culture, I feel worn down, preoccupied, less attune to the art. Case in point, I watched half of Che part 1 but grew tired because of getting up early for work, and had to turn it off, and truthfully, that is not giving the film its proper due, I feel like I am missing something, I am not as sharp as I was, especially when I was working part-time and drifting. People in France work less hours and have more vacation time and I think that kind of culture is more accepting of indulgences like art.