Director: Jaco van Dormael (The Eighth Day, Totò the Hero)
Writer: Jaco van Dormael
Editors: Matyas Veress, Susan Shipton
Producer: Philippe Godeau
Starring: Jared Leto, Sarah Polley, Toby Regbo, Juno Temple, Diane Kruger, Rhys Ifans, Natasha Little
MPAA Rating: 14A
Running time: 138 min.





One of the oddest, most thoughtful and certainly ambitious film screening at this year’s Toronto Film Festival is certainly Jaco van Dormael’s Mr. Nobody. But this is also one of the most intelligent scripts I’ve yet to see this year. Mixing hard science fact, hypothesis and theories with classic philosophy and drama, Mr. Nobody dives into all manner of possibilities wrapped around quite an enigmatic tale of love, choice and opportunities seized and lost.
To attempt a synopsis in under 1000 words seems almost futile, but I’ll give it a shot anyway. The film starts in the future of 2092. The oldest man in the world, Nemo Nobody, has captured the attention of the world as the last man that will ever die of old age since automatic cell regeneration has been achieved. Nemo sits in a hospital of sorts and recounts his life first to a sort of doctor/hypnotist, then later to a journalist. The tale weaved starts before Nemo’s birth as he tells the process a soul goes through before choosing its parents. The story then moves through adolescence and into manhood but in a nonlinear fashion. We see several versions of Nemo’s life had he made one choice over another and we move back and forth in time to get different perspectives of different events and indeed different and sometimes intersecting lifetimes. As I said, not the easiest of plots to explain in words, but if you were to combine Abre los Ojos (Vanilla Sky) with Gwynneth Paltrow’s Sliding Doors, you have a rough idea the style in which the narrative is told. Add some elements and the influence of such films as Slaughterhouse 5, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, 2001: A Space Odyssey and the warm hearted drama and tone of Amélie (just to name a few) into the mix and you understand the ambitiousness that the film strives for. Unbelievably, it succeeds beyond expectations and then some!
Without at least a second viewing it’s difficult to wrap one’s head around everything that is going on here. Essentially the story looks at the randomness of the universe and the possibilities of the butterfly effect. Can a person influence or even directly change the outcome of future events simply by not making choices? An actual impossibility of course to not choose, but maybe one can stay as emotionally safe as possible simply by not choosing a particular path over another. Adding in the effect of time and how time is perceived along with a look at the possibilities of other dimensions, both spatial and temporal, not only enhances the possibilities of the narrative, but also keeps the viewer always thinking, imagining and dreaming.
Most breathtaking is the magical camera work on display. All sorts of tricks are employed to easily and seamlessly segue from one moment in time to the next and from one character and his or her locale to the next. The fantastic use of space and movement almost defies belief as to where the camera takes the viewer.
We move in and out of paintings, photos, drawings and even letters to bring us where we need to be to make sense of the situation. Surreal, yet spectacular effects and ideas challenge our perceptions of locales and situations. The mixing of both plastic models and real world within the same shot add to the imaginative feel to the inner workings of our character’s minds and thoughts. As a single example from where there could be many, watching construction helicopters lift huge cubes of water directly out of a lake and carry them across a futuristic city leaving only perfectly geometrically shaped holes in the water is jaw-dropping. And at no time do any of these scenarios appear shoddy. The camera work is exquisite and blends reality and fantasy with precision and sharpness.
Beyond the use of top notch camera work and the infusion of imagination so perfectly within this created reality, there is also perfectly timed and obvious pain-staking editing prowess at work all throughout this picture. The juxtaposition and melding of not only seamless temporal transitions, but also time-lapse and reverse time photography, along with staggered freeze-frames makes for the utmost at infusing thematic and cinematic texture to the story. On top of this, the use of metaphorical imagery throughout is, while maybe obvious, gorgeous and stunning and interwoven within the story quite nicely. The inner workings of a giant clock or the speed of railroad tracks crossing and merging for example is seamlessly tied into the visual drama. And to be frank, just keeping the various threads of the story cohesive and lacking in confusion is a realized miracle in and of itself.
While a director like Oliver Stone’s use of these techniques is often just used to add artful imagery and can sometimes feel out of place or inserted strictly just to appear “artsy” (which is fine in many cases), with Mr. Nobody, nothing is done without reason. Each instance of watching the characters physically moving backwards in time or seem to appear to stop moving altogether is integral to the story’s focus and ultimately a clue as to what is really going on within the narrative. Every bit of technique utilized by the film maker is essential and well planned from the get-go to achieve what the story sets out to accomplish.
And while all of this might sound as though it will appear rushed, chaotic or frantic, nothing could be further from the truth. The transitions are smooth and elegant. The story and on screen movement flows effortlessly despite the apparently convoluted and unconventional structure of the narrative and its character’s actions.
At the conclusion of the film, the performances within almost seem like an afterthought compared to the physical and metaphysical beauty of Mr. Nobody. However, I do believe I’ve not seen such a charismatic or headstrong performance from the likes of Sarah Polley in anything previous to this film. While she actually has very little screen time, her character is strong and interesting, if a bit unhinged and melancholy. Singling out Polley is easy but to be fair, pretty much every performance in Mr. Nobody is fantastic. More screen time could’ve been given to any one of the leading ladies and it would only help the film. Jared Leto takes on this leading role with the strength and courage that not just anyone could have – including some A-listers that come to mind. Also look for some of these teen actors to start appearing in more films (hopefully). They really help tie the proverbial room together and are the glue that keeps their particular story threads believable and tight.
The special effects used in the movie are flawless. Yes, there is a trip to the stars within the movie and extra-terrestrial planets and the vessels that take our characters to them look 100% photo realistic. The gorgeous look of recent films such as Sunshine or Mission to Mars don’t hold anything over the head of Mr. Nobody. Truly this is a sci-fi epic that can hold its own against the main stream big boys in terms of visual prowess. Gorgeous with a capital “G” throughout.
Clocking in at just under 150 minutes, some may argue that the film could stand a snip or a tuck here or there to keep it tighter; but for myself, I could’ve sat at attention for much longer with just as much anticipation, enjoyment and wide-eyed as the first two hours. Yes, this is a film that might be tough to wrap your head around or difficult to comprehend all that is happening and why upon a first viewing, but the movie is never confusing. We always know where we are, what we’re dealing with and with whom. The movie just flows thematically, visually and even narratively (despite being all over the place in time and space) like a carefully winding stream. The entire feel of the movie is joyously mesmerizing and concludes with a better ending I cannot imagine. I have waited all year for this and it has finally come: my first 5/5 star film of the year. Rejoice.





I generally agree with your sentiments Andrew, but I am one of those people who felt it went too long and could have lost 20 minutes or so. Technically it is amazing, it is, like I said on twitter, the best of Fincher and Jeunet in its handling of fluid and eye-popping filmmaking. And even getting old person make-up done perfectly is an accomplishment! I loved the final conceit of the film, the beginning and end are masterfully done, but some of the romantic parts in-between felt stale to me… in particular the Sarah Polly thread. I also felt it was being a little too cute at times, with the parents, and with the segments of Jared Leto talking to the audience.
Jared Leto kicked ass though, if he was under all that make-up he was totally convincing.
I was also pretty tired when I saw the film so that might have affected my experience of it.
Agree with Rot, somehow 20 minutes trimmed away could have made this a perfect film, as it stands it was still one of my favourite of the fest and will happily own Mr. Nobody on DVD filed beside Primer, The Fountain and Donnie Darko.
This just jumped to the top of my want-to-see list. I already singled it out based on the description on the TIFF website, but you just confirmed it. And Kurt double confirmed it by name-checking Primer, The Fountain, and Donnie Darko.
Juno Temple had a good run at the festival, this and Cracks. You will remember her from Atonement, and in this she plays the young Anna.
Finally, some respect for The Fountain..
My friends take me for an idiot for it being one of my favorites.
Great review.
@Dan
Andrew isn't alone in his THE FOUNTAIN love. I think around these parts we're all fans.
Anyone who likes stuff along the lines of THE FOUNTAIN (yes,another fan here!), DONNIE DARKO, PRIMER or 2001 is going to head-over-heels in love with Mr. Nobody. It is most certainly headed for sci-fi geek cult status.
And if anyone is ready to take on the magnificent Alastair Reynolds novel "CHASM CITY" I'm really hoping that the director Jaco van Dormael is the man to do it.
I can accept how someone might feel as though the story drags a little bit in the middle. But for me, I was fully engulfed in these characters lives and loved every second of it – particularly the teenager thread. Their love seemed so real and heartbreaking on screen time flew by for me. I can't believe this film is 2 1/2 hours long. It felt like 1 hour and a half to me.
Yep, The Fountain is one of my favorite films. Sounds like I better be reserving a spot on my top ten list for Mr. Nobody. Does it have a US distributor yet?
Yay! The Fountain fans all around here!
I can't wait to see Mr. Nobody – at Sitges baby! 🙂
And the sitges full schedule came out today. Enjoy Splice, Dan. It may be the only chance you have to see it in that form,so I suggest you make time for it instead of sunning on the beach!
Sitges schedule: http://sitgesfilmfestival.com/eng/programa/projec…
[Rec]2 is opening the fest, and it is an enjoyable enough 'boo-scare' movie, not as good as the first, but definitely ups the scale and scope of the original.
I was really expecting to like this film but found I could only sit through about half of it. I don't much care about special effects; a film sinks or swims with me based on how compelling the story is. I was interested in the structure of Mr. Nobody and how that was going to resolve, but I found the details of the alternate realities deadly dull. I did not care which one was "real" or if they were all somehow coexisting; I couldn't have cared less which woman he would have chosen (had he made a choice). Slaughterhouse Five (since you mention it) combined a WWII scenario with a dysfunctional family and life on Tralthamador. It mixed all those elements into a brilliant satire on mid 20th century values. Mr. Nobody — judging by the first half at least — is nothing in comparison.
Has this not found a distributor yet? I've heard nothing on a theatrical release.
I agree with Drew K. I would have gladly trimmed those unbearable minutes (time indeed seemed to stretch) of adolescents whispering platitudes under the covers and replaced them with Vonnegut's dark humour and satire.
It doesn't have Primer's solid scientific aspects or intelligent minimalism, doesn't have Eternal Sunshine's depth of character, or the mix of quirky fantasy and realism, doesn't have Donnie Darko's eerie darkness.
Much like in "Amélie" (and because the movie doesn't have time for complexity to actually emerge by itself) some characters are oversimplified, this is especially annoying because the movie is supposed to deal with complicated themes.
It all seemed like an all-encompassing metaphysical mess (butterfly effect, time travelling, parralel universes, quantum physics…) tied in a pretentious succession of glossy shots and in-your-face transition effects, and ended up looking about as poetic and coherent as a series of perfume commercials.
All the arbitrary motions of this overwhelming imaginary wheel of fortune become tiresome and I ended up detached and disengaged.
When the movie starts rewinding at the end with the old man laughing, I felt as if the movie was mocking me. It can be fast-forwarded or played backwards, but I can never get those 2 hours of my life back.
I think this movie, above all, showed the best portrayal of teenage love that I've seen in any movie. Hit the nail on the head in more ways than words could describe. As a whole, the film was the best love-child that could have resulted from mating Donnie Darko and Slaughterhouse 5. I could have watched hours more and not gotten the slightest bit tired.
I really hated and loved this film, or whatever it was. It was like that learnind maching in the Lawnmower Man shoving a whole novel into my head at once.
The theme of what "could" have happened was tied together by the old Nemo remembering the possiblities of his life as if all his choices had been made, and the consequences that went with them all happened, as if each happened in a separate universe, and this old man remembered them all because an angel forgot to shoosh him.
Whew. I wonder what would have happened if I never saw this? I would have enjoyed reading this more, but then the book that never existed is always better. Once you see it, you'll understand…haa, haa, haa!
I thoroughly enjoyed this film, I thought it was brilliant.
After reading some of these comments though, I’m reminded of what I learnt in High School, and that is that brilliant people can be very dull emotionally. Being analytical, and stripping events and ideas of emotion, may work in science and economics but, when it’s carried over into matters of the heart, it makes Jack a very dull boy indeed, except of course to their lonely selves.