<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: [.REC] 2 Trailer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rowthree.com/2009/06/04/rec-2-trailer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rowthree.com/2009/06/04/rec-2-trailer/</link>
	<description>Where Cinema is more than just $100 Million productions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:16:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt Halfyard</title>
		<link>http://www.rowthree.com/2009/06/04/rec-2-trailer/#comment-30497</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt Halfyard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 18:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rowthree.com/?p=14804#comment-30497</guid>
		<description>Not that [REC] holds a candle to Alien (although [REC] did have that 20 minutes of nothing happens build in there), they are clearly going the ALIENS sequel route with this one.  Firepower and action instead of hole-up and die one by one.

Also, I know that [REC] is to a degree its own brand, but I wonder what the &#039;status-icon&#039; of those on-the-shoulder cameras is, that would have made a more satisfying title over [REC]2

I&#039;ll try to find a cinema showing this though, as [REC] was a fun ride at Fantasia a couple years ago in their central screen with a truly kick-ass sound system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that [REC] holds a candle to Alien (although [REC] did have that 20 minutes of nothing happens build in there), they are clearly going the ALIENS sequel route with this one.  Firepower and action instead of hole-up and die one by one.</p>
<p>Also, I know that [REC] is to a degree its own brand, but I wonder what the &#8216;status-icon&#8217; of those on-the-shoulder cameras is, that would have made a more satisfying title over [REC]2</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll try to find a cinema showing this though, as [REC] was a fun ride at Fantasia a couple years ago in their central screen with a truly kick-ass sound system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonas</title>
		<link>http://www.rowthree.com/2009/06/04/rec-2-trailer/#comment-30496</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 18:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rowthree.com/?p=14804#comment-30496</guid>
		<description>I was wondering how they would make the movie different from the first one but still keep the same idea. It&#039;s so obvious now.. This looks excellent. Thank god it&#039;s by the same people.

I haven&#039;t managed to bring myself to watch quarantine.. which is strange as I tend to watch every decent looking zombie film i can find. But it just looks too similiar, only less creepy.. I just don&#039;t see any reason to watch it.

Maybe someday.

But [REC]2 woo!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering how they would make the movie different from the first one but still keep the same idea. It&#8217;s so obvious now.. This looks excellent. Thank god it&#8217;s by the same people.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t managed to bring myself to watch quarantine.. which is strange as I tend to watch every decent looking zombie film i can find. But it just looks too similiar, only less creepy.. I just don&#8217;t see any reason to watch it.</p>
<p>Maybe someday.</p>
<p>But [REC]2 woo!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

