<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Duplicity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rowthree.com/2009/03/23/review-duplicity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rowthree.com/2009/03/23/review-duplicity/</link>
	<description>Where Cinema is more than just $100 Million productions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:49:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kurt</title>
		<link>http://www.rowthree.com/2009/03/23/review-duplicity/#comment-50907</link>
		<dc:creator>kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rowthree.com/?p=11856#comment-50907</guid>
		<description>I adored this movie.  I daresay it almost cracked my top 10 last year.  I have no idea why people are down on it.  It&#039;s sharp, old-school hollywood style filmmaking with a bit of a modern spin.  Great chemistry, great supporting characters, and a its rare to have a bigger budget &#039;con man&#039; flick, so yea.  I&#039;m all in on this one.  I imagine it will find its audience eventually, as people revisit it.  I imagine it would indeed get better on multiple views, if only to savor the dialogue delivery and not be so hung up on plot.  (See also:  Coen Brothers, Wes Anderson, etc. etc.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I adored this movie.  I daresay it almost cracked my top 10 last year.  I have no idea why people are down on it.  It&#8217;s sharp, old-school hollywood style filmmaking with a bit of a modern spin.  Great chemistry, great supporting characters, and a its rare to have a bigger budget &#8216;con man&#8217; flick, so yea.  I&#8217;m all in on this one.  I imagine it will find its audience eventually, as people revisit it.  I imagine it would indeed get better on multiple views, if only to savor the dialogue delivery and not be so hung up on plot.  (See also:  Coen Brothers, Wes Anderson, etc. etc.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew James</title>
		<link>http://www.rowthree.com/2009/03/23/review-duplicity/#comment-50904</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rowthree.com/?p=11856#comment-50904</guid>
		<description>Second viewing holds up for what it is - maybe even liked it a little bit more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Second viewing holds up for what it is &#8211; maybe even liked it a little bit more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marina Antunes</title>
		<link>http://www.rowthree.com/2009/03/23/review-duplicity/#comment-27503</link>
		<dc:creator>Marina Antunes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 22:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rowthree.com/?p=11856#comment-27503</guid>
		<description>Caught up with this last week and completely fall on the side of thoroughly enjoying the hi jinx. It was a lot of fun to see the level of espionage/counter intelligence going on over something so small but on the grand scheme of things, it also makes a lot of sense considering the sheer amount of money involved when you&#039;re talking about these big corporations.

It&#039;s fun, fluffy and entertaining with the added bonus of not feeling &quot;dumbed down&quot; and being beautifully shot. Thoroughly enjoyed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Caught up with this last week and completely fall on the side of thoroughly enjoying the hi jinx. It was a lot of fun to see the level of espionage/counter intelligence going on over something so small but on the grand scheme of things, it also makes a lot of sense considering the sheer amount of money involved when you&#8217;re talking about these big corporations.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s fun, fluffy and entertaining with the added bonus of not feeling &#8220;dumbed down&#8221; and being beautifully shot. Thoroughly enjoyed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

