<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unnecessary Donnie Darko Sequel:  S. Darko</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rowthree.com/2008/05/09/unnecessary-donnie-darko-sequel-s-darko/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rowthree.com/2008/05/09/unnecessary-donnie-darko-sequel-s-darko/</link>
	<description>Where Cinema is more than just $100 Million productions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:15:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snail</title>
		<link>http://www.rowthree.com/2008/05/09/unnecessary-donnie-darko-sequel-s-darko/#comment-21906</link>
		<dc:creator>Snail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 22:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rowthree.com/?p=2068#comment-21906</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll give it a chance out of love for Donnie Darko but i have very little expectations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll give it a chance out of love for Donnie Darko but i have very little expectations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.rowthree.com/2008/05/09/unnecessary-donnie-darko-sequel-s-darko/#comment-9033</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 09:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rowthree.com/?p=2068#comment-9033</guid>
		<description>This seems pretty ridiculous but maybe it&#039;ll end up going straight-to-DVD and none of us will ever have to think of it ever again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems pretty ridiculous but maybe it&#8217;ll end up going straight-to-DVD and none of us will ever have to think of it ever again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Becker</title>
		<link>http://www.rowthree.com/2008/05/09/unnecessary-donnie-darko-sequel-s-darko/#comment-9032</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Becker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 09:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rowthree.com/?p=2068#comment-9032</guid>
		<description>I concur with the above.  DONNIE DARKO=awesomeness.  DD2=a pathetic stab at a fast buck.

Almost as ridiculous as the rumors of a TITANIC sequel that were circulating years ago.  Just think, after that movie made mega millions, of how many executives wished the damn ship docked safely, at least once.  Probably the only movie on the highest grossing list where a sequel was impossible, AND IT&#039;S GOT THE NUMBER ONE POSITION BY A LONGSHOT!

You gotta love it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I concur with the above.  DONNIE DARKO=awesomeness.  DD2=a pathetic stab at a fast buck.</p>
<p>Almost as ridiculous as the rumors of a TITANIC sequel that were circulating years ago.  Just think, after that movie made mega millions, of how many executives wished the damn ship docked safely, at least once.  Probably the only movie on the highest grossing list where a sequel was impossible, AND IT&#8217;S GOT THE NUMBER ONE POSITION BY A LONGSHOT!</p>
<p>You gotta love it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.rowthree.com/2008/05/09/unnecessary-donnie-darko-sequel-s-darko/#comment-9013</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 18:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rowthree.com/?p=2068#comment-9013</guid>
		<description>I am coming at this piece of info as having DD at number 2 on my top 100 films of all time list. And I am obviously miffed and rather angry about the idea that they&#039;re doing a sequel. One of the major appeals of the film in the first place was how original it was, and now they are going to sour that by making a probably lame sequel. Sometimes Hollywood truly disgusts me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am coming at this piece of info as having DD at number 2 on my top 100 films of all time list. And I am obviously miffed and rather angry about the idea that they&#8217;re doing a sequel. One of the major appeals of the film in the first place was how original it was, and now they are going to sour that by making a probably lame sequel. Sometimes Hollywood truly disgusts me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marina Antunes</title>
		<link>http://www.rowthree.com/2008/05/09/unnecessary-donnie-darko-sequel-s-darko/#comment-9006</link>
		<dc:creator>Marina Antunes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 16:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rowthree.com/?p=2068#comment-9006</guid>
		<description>I really enjoyed DD but there&#039;s no way I&#039;m giving these people money for what sounds like a lame money grabbing sequel. I&#039;ll sit at home and have nightmares of big bunny rabbits instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really enjoyed DD but there&#8217;s no way I&#8217;m giving these people money for what sounds like a lame money grabbing sequel. I&#8217;ll sit at home and have nightmares of big bunny rabbits instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt Halfyard</title>
		<link>http://www.rowthree.com/2008/05/09/unnecessary-donnie-darko-sequel-s-darko/#comment-9000</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt Halfyard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 14:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rowthree.com/?p=2068#comment-9000</guid>
		<description>That seems in line with the re-re-visionist (!) opinion of the film after all the kiddies jumped all over it.  

I still think the film is indeed an important one, it remains a regular enough viewing particularly for Jena Malone and Mary McDonnell and Holmes Osborne.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That seems in line with the re-re-visionist (!) opinion of the film after all the kiddies jumped all over it.  </p>
<p>I still think the film is indeed an important one, it remains a regular enough viewing particularly for Jena Malone and Mary McDonnell and Holmes Osborne.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew James</title>
		<link>http://www.rowthree.com/2008/05/09/unnecessary-donnie-darko-sequel-s-darko/#comment-8996</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 14:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rowthree.com/?p=2068#comment-8996</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m one of the few who doesn&#039;t see the &quot;amazingness&quot; in the first DD, so this sequel idea holds very little interest to me.  Don&#039;t all jump on me at once.  I didn&#039;t hate DD or anything, just don&#039;t see the greatness in it.  I think it&#039;s just alright.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m one of the few who doesn&#8217;t see the &#8220;amazingness&#8221; in the first DD, so this sequel idea holds very little interest to me.  Don&#8217;t all jump on me at once.  I didn&#8217;t hate DD or anything, just don&#8217;t see the greatness in it.  I think it&#8217;s just alright.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

