Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Rss Subscribe



Categories

Other Movie Sites

Review: War Inc.

by Kurt Halfyard
April 30th, 2008

War Inc - captionedA hamfisted John Cusack vehicle from some of the folks that brought you Grosse Pointe Blank, this second go around with the hitman with a heart of bronze and angsty romantic issues, is more than a bit of a bust. Call it Naomi Klein’s The Shock Doctrine for dummies - it seems like the writers read the book and thought they’d preach the message to the slowest folks in the room. Heck, call it Fierce Creatures, as that Cleese-Palin-Curtis-Kline ‘comedy’ is the modern template of failing to follow up to a fun contemporary classic.

The story follows Brand Hauser, en route from an assassination in the Canadian territories to a small Middle eastern country, recently bombed into submission by the USA, where he has to knock off the local oil baron who is building a pipeline which is not in the economic interest of ex-Vice President and now CEO of a Halliburton/BlackWater-esque corporation (Dan Aykroyd, going for Dick Cheney and displaying none of the peppy charms of GPB’s Grocer. The best War Inc. can come up with for him is a hoary Fat Bastard poop joke). His cover is as the producer of a tradeshow which is inviting American corporations into the rebuilding efforts of the countries infrastructure. This ill conceived high-profile cover puts him in the position on having to deal with the embedded reporters in the Green Zone (that is when they are not doing their reporting from the corporations ‘Disneyland Motion Ride’ virtual war viewer) as well as the trade-show’s razzle-dazzle wedding of an Asian pop-tart (a surprisingly good Hillary Duff in beige-face as Yonica Babyyeah) to the son of the same targeted oil-Baron Hauser is there to terminate. Although running the show does provide an excellent excuse for sister Joan Cusack to reprise her ‘harried secretary’ role albeit this time with none of the charm.

Much like Grosse Pointe Blank, an assassination plot is fused with a romantic comedy, which ends up as the greater focus of the film, expect that this one fizzles out simply because it gives the female lead, Marissa Tomei, precious little to do except confirm to the audience that she is way above this - she almost does for War Inc. what did with the thankless role in Before the Devil Knows You’re Dead. More embarassing is John Cusack who gets double duty as star and co-writer and giving the impression that he would rather fall back on an old crutch, the sadsack looking-for-something-more hitman. Mr. Cusack has not had a good movie since 2000’s High Fidelity, and if the mediocre 1408 was a badly fumbled attempt to remake Stanley Kubrick’s The Shining with a modern sensibility, then War Inc. is an equally failed attempt to update the nihilistic-absurdity of Dr. Strangelove.

Director Joshua Seftel is certainly no George Armitage (who brought the good to GPB and also directed the criminally underseen Alec Baldwin dead-pan comedy Miami Blues). Seftel is more in love with referencing Kubrick, conceptually, visually and musically, than telling any sort of structured or modulated narrative or even a worthwhile character to cling to. Blame the screenplay too, which has trouble finding its own voice amongst the mimicry of better films. For the mayhem of something like Doomsday (a film from earlier this year that re-hashes several other genre noteworthys) that approach can be inspired, for the delicate and precision strikes necessary for good satire, the approach is crippling. Instead of going for Kubrick, perhaps should have watched Wag The Dog or Three Kings a few more times to see how a structured script that eschews ‘big surprise moments’ is perhaps a better approach than cluttered Southland Tales model (a film War Inc. has in common both in advertisement branded tanks and contemporary pop singers in significant roles; and further similarity in going from an intimate and human-scaled first film (Donnie Darko) to an overreaching scope with the second.) Like that film, there are a few genuinely interesting sight-gags such as the disaster capitalist gift-bag or the scramble-screen celebrity-encryption technique for the mysterious Viceroy.

Ben Kingsley makes the most embarassing appearance as Sexy Beast’s Don Logan with a dreadful Yankee accent to provide a backstory for Hauser’s mid-life moral crisis. And daytime talkshow host Montel Williams has the good sense not to show his face replacing Alan Arkin as the beleaguered therapist who in War Inc. is some sort of hybrid of K.I.T.T. and OnStar, existing as a swirl of light that dispenses advice between telling Hauser to make a right at Greenland in his private jet. If I’m belaboring the comparisons to Grosse Pointe Blank here, it is simply because they map so distinctly over top of War Inc. that they are impossible to ignore in the same way That Ivan Reitman’s Evolution was impossible not to compare to the far superior Ghost Busters.

Corporate profiteering in modern warfare is a subject ripe for satire for a smarter film than War Inc. And grafting on background to a romantic comedy of sorts makes the whole affair an ill conceived, gangly beast that deserves its place in the DVD bargain bin of failed John Cusack films (perhaps they should have attempted to loosely re-envision One Crazy Summer?). Go find Gregor Jordan’s Buffalo Soldiers, a modern war satire with similar aims that is more deserving of your attention, and/or read the Naomi Klein tell-all if you are looking for truly depressing tragi-comedy of the modern age. And let War Inc. quietly file for bankruptcy.

Filed under: Reviews
Spread the word: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon

5 Comments »

  1. Well, at least Hillary Duff is good.

    That’s actually kind of sad.

    Comment by Marina Antunes — May 1, 2008 @ 12:01 pm

  2. You obviously have it in for poor John (and Joan?) Cusack with the irrelevent snitty remarks about his previous films. You point out many references and homages in War, Inc, but none live up to your standards. T.S., Eliot. Most decidedly the Grosse Pointe Blank comparisons are belabored but so is the review.

    War, Inc is one of the more amusing black comedies to come out in ages and you’re a dullard.

    What can one expect from someone who proclaims Ghostbusters “far superior” to any other movie, much less another abominable Ivan Reitman film? John Cusack’s worst movie is brilliant compared to Reitman’s best production.

    Comment by Robert Cameron — May 12, 2008 @ 11:32 pm

  3. Even as a long time Cusack fan, I don’t see the value in this particular ‘belaboured’ (and clunky) effort.

    Ghostbusters, while hardly ‘better than any movie ever made’, is for a special effects blockbuster, actually quite light on its feet. Something War Inc. most definitely is not. The picture lacks grace and wit and is about as clumsy as can be for the satire it surely wants to be.

    And while you are busy blindly praising Mr. Cusack’s oeuvre, kindly defend America’s Sweethearts or Must Love Dogs, I’d love to hear how those films are great….Heck, even a passionate defense of the abominable 1408 would be welcome rather than throwing easy insults my way.

    Comment by Kurt — May 13, 2008 @ 5:04 am

  4. I hope you’re prepared to publicly eat your “file for bankruptcy” comment. You have an impressive and informed palate but not much vision… And that isn’t a dig at critics versus artists. You should see the movie again from a humble place. Maybe, perhaps, you aren’t as clever as you think. Then you may begin to see the purpose of the film.
    Nick Gillie

    Comment by Nick Gillie — June 6, 2008 @ 1:19 pm

  5. Nick. Perhaps you should learn to see the difference between good satire and bad satire. Then maybe you’d see where i”m coming from. If War Inc. were made in 2003 perhaps it’d be an edgy comment, but it’d still have some serious story and pacing problems. Yie, that film is a mess. (And being a fan of GPB and High Fidelity, and many other Cusack films I really, really really wanted to like this film…)

    Comment by Kurt Halfyard — June 6, 2008 @ 5:31 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment