• Review: 4 Months, 3 Weeks, 2 Days

    One sheet

    Director: Cristian Mungiu (Occident)
    Writer: Cristian Mungiu
    Producers: Cristian Mungiu , Oleg Mutu
    Starring: Anamaria Marinca, Vlad Ivanov, Laura Vasiliu, Alexandru Potoceanu
    MPAA Rating: NR
    Running time: 113 min



    You may feel the need to have a good, hot shower (or two) at the conclusion of 4 Months, 3 Weeks, 2 Days. The movie is gritty, dark, cold and depressing. But sitting above all that is the fact that it’s undeniably compelling; despite its repugnant subject matter.

    Taking place in communist Romania in 1987, we start our story in a student dormitory where we follow a young lady named Otilia as she goes about morning business. Looking for friends to talk to, buying some cigarettes and other essentials. We can tell something is going on between her and her flat mate, Gabita, as if they are planning something important; though we’re not quite sure what. We follow Otilia throughout the morning: meeting her boyfriend, gathering some money, stopping at a hotel, etc; still obviously preparing for something important and secretive. Eventually she meets up with a stranger in a public place, whom she brings back to Gabita at the hotel. Here is where we finally learn that an illegal abortion is about to be performed. As little problems that have arisen throughout the day grow more and more important and more and more impactful, we can see that this entire situation is a time bomb waiting to go off. Things quickly begin to spiral downward and out of control and Otilia must make decisions that will change the way she views the world, her friends and most importantly herself, forever.

    Anamaria Marinca as OtiliaWhile I try not to draw too many comparisons with other films in my written reviews, I couldn’t help but be reminded of Gus Van Sant’s high school drama, Elephant. While not as literally explosive as Elephant ends up being, 4 Months, 3 Weeks, 2 Days appears to draw some inspiration from Mr. Van Sant as it spends quite a bit of its running time with seemingly mundane details and lengthy shots of characters going about normal, everyday activities; or lengthy, nearly silent shots of characters while in not such a mundane circumstance. The difference between the two films however, would be that while Elephant slowly builds nothing into cataclysm by the end, 4, 3, 2 has several moments interspersed throughout that are cringingly gripping and even interesting and sometimes sickening and degrading.

    The director really does a fantastic job of getting us to sympathize with Otilia after the choices and sacrifices she makes for herself and her friend. We may not be so sympathetic at the time; but it’s later, when we’re forced to sit and think about what has happened that we really feel the sting of emotion. Whether it be a lengthy (10 minutes) happy birthday dinner party in which we get a long unbroken shot of Otilia as she sits at a dinner table full of joyous conversationalists or Otilia just sitting on a chair loooking at the floor as she contemplates and questions her friend on what has happened, we have no choice but to look into Otilia’s eyes and in this way, we’re very forcefully thrust into her shoes and we want nothing more than to be somewhere else.

    4 Months, 3 Weeks, 2 DaysOf course it wouldn’t work all that well without the simply fantastic resonance of Anamaria Marinca’s acting ability. Her devotion to the role is obvious and her level of emotional output is unparalleled and so true that it almost hurts to think about it even afterwards. Of course her flat mate’s naivete and “scared little girl” routine is played out all too well by the talented and beutiful Laura Vasiliu. With the two of them playing off Vlad Ivanov’s (the abortion “doctor” Mr Bebe) devilish experience in one of the movie’s most pivotal scenes, it’s another case where we just want all this to be over, for we know this just can’t end up good – even in a best case scenario. But it never seems to end, which is the tragedy in the story and ironically, part of the greatness of the film.

    The director’s use of a hand-held camera and apparently all natural lighting just adds to the dreariness. Communist Romania doesn’t look like too much fun of a place to be living in 1987 and much of that is due to the cinematography and art direction. Some of the shaky cam gets a tad grating in a couple of scenes, but for the most part it’s very much under control and helps to stir the emotion that much more with its sense of realism. This all culminates with a closing scene that brings everything we’ve experienced and everything we’ve felt to the examination room, so to speak; and we’re forced in near silence to ponder what has transpired over this entire, emotionally draining day. The perfect closing to a near perfect film.

    Whether you’re pro-choice or pro-life, fear not. The film doesn’t preach one way or another. It’s simply a story of two inexperienced women faced with impossible decisions, a harsh world and a brush with some unfortunate luck. If you wanted to say that the film does have a message, that might be accurate, but I can see that the film maybe makes an argument for (or against) those on either side of the proverbial fence. You can watch it for yourself and make up your own mind on whether the movie has some sort of political or social agenda. In my opinion, not at all.

    Having not seen any of the foreign langauge films nominated for an Oscar this past year, the following may not be a fair comment: why this film wasn’t nominated is a travesty beyond words. I can’t imagine any of the other foreign language films surpassing the oxmoronic, ugly beauty of 4 Months, 3 Weeks, 2 Days and it’s boldly and brilliantly told story. Shame on The Academy; this is a winner through and through.


    Click “play” to see the trailer:

    Links:
    IMDb profile
    Official Site
    Flixster Profile for 4 Months, 3 Weeks, 2 Days

12 Comments


  1. Henrik says:

    I’m glad that behind all the bullshit, you actually can recognize something thats great when you see it Andrew! While I don’t hold this in as high regard as you do, I agree with alot of what you write in this review. While your review is (like yourself) unmistakingly american (Elephant, pro-choice/pro-life references) I think it’s comforting fact that an american would like a film like this – EVEN if his own film industry doesn’t think it’s anything special (unlike unique film-making like Crash, The Departed & No Country For Old Men :P ).

  2. Kurt Halfyard says:

    Henrik, I’m amused by your couched-in-phrase condescending ‘anti-american’ tone (we smell our own, I’ve accidentally done this and am usually immediately sorry for it). But you are mistaken when you (I’m assuming ironically) label Crash, The Departed and No Country as unique (hilarious – ha ha – considering one is a remake). – These films were rewarded by AMPAS with Oscars because they are familiar and fresh at the same time — at the high-end of middle-brow (although The Coen’s and more specifically McCarthy’s work is even higher end than those other two).

    Pretty soon you are going to have Goon frothing at the mouth again. :)

    I’m really looking forward to 4 Months, … because that trailer simply is incredible.

  3. Joseph says:

    I look forward to the DVD. I really want to see this one.

  4. Henrik says:

    I was hoping to come off alittle more playful in this thread than I have in the past. I think it’s fair for me to poke at american friends for having a president who drops basketballs, and a motion picture association that awards Crash and The Departed. NCFOM is definitely above those two films, but still is just a genrepicture. Hardly challenging stuff.

    What does couched-in-phrase mean though?

  5. Ross Miller says:

    I saw this a couple of months ago and I was BLOWN AWAY. First 5 star review of the year at the time from me (second was There Will BE Blood, yes; delayed release!:P). Raw power and realism has rarely been matched in cinema.

    It’s also one of the most depressing films in recent memory – you come out feeling like the world is total sh*t:P

    (Btw, Andrew, are you counting this as a 2008 film? It won the Palm d’Or last year and it WAS made in 2007 (maybe even 2006) but released in 2008. So what are you counting it as?

  6. Andrew James says:

    For me it’s 2008. As was 2006 palm d’orr winner, “Wind that Shakes the Barley” a 2007 film for me. For most of America, this film is just seeing its release in the past couple months.

    @Henrik. Why are you surprised I like a great movie? Just because I have fun with a “Cloverfield” or a “28 Weeks Later” means I must be immuned to other forms of cinema (subtitles! *GASP*)? I sort of actually pity your snobbishness. To a point, film snobbery is fine, but when it interferes with your enjoyment of about 99% of films (as it seems to in your case), why even bother going to the movies at all?

  7. Marina Antunes says:

    I should probably see this again at some point considering that I had the tallest man on the planet sitting in front of me but I was so emotionally drained after seeing it that I wasn’t prepared to give into it again any time soon and now…I’m not sure I’d fall into it lightly either. Mungiu’s film is too real, personal and private to easily taken in and that’s likely one of the reasons it was snubbed by the Oscars.

    I don’t feel too badly for Mungiu though – he’s definitely getting a load of critical love – and between this and “12:08 East of Bucharest” (which is HYSTERICAL), we’re well on or way to a “Romanian New Wave”.

  8. Matt Gamble says:

    Finally saw it tonight and I have to say I was disappointed. It’s certainly a good movie but not as good as I had been hearing. It also reminded me a great deal of Red Road but Red Road is a superior film.

    And Kurt you really should go see this if you haven’t yet. Their is a dinner scene that has Finite Focus written all over it and should make you sufficiently gooey with delight.

  9. Andrew James says:

    Matt, dinner is arguably the best scene in the movie – maybe one of the best scenes of 2007 actually.

    Loved the long takes throughout with reaction shots and or only one person being shown in a two person conversation.

  10. Matt Gamble says:

    Oh I agree I liked all of that and the dinner scene really is fantastic. It might be because I was expecting it to be a bit more suspenseful when it really is just more of a foreboding feeling of general crappiness (as in everything these people must go through is awful for them) then anything else.

  11. Andrew James says:

    Yeah, I remember talking to you about it before hand and you mentioning that you had heard it was “pretty intense.” While I had heard from most people that this isn’t realy a thriller. It’s more like a dialogue movie that just sort of goes, but it’s really gritty along the way sort of along the same lines as Gus Van Sant’s “Elephant.”

    Plus, the expectations and the high praise you heard from other people probably had you hoping for something more than it could ever be.

  12. Matt Gamble says:

    So yeah, this is all your fault. ;)

Leave a comment