The Vampyre Chronicles: Shadow of the Vampire (2000)

In the early 1920’s, director F.W. Murnau set out to make a movie based on Bram Stoker’s classic novel, Dracula. The resulting film, titled Nosferatu and starring Max Schreck as the vampire, remains to this day a masterwork of horror.

Shadow of the Vampire, released in 2000, is a fictional account of the making of Nosferatu, with one small modification. This time around, the roles of vampire and actor have been reversed. Nosferatu’s Max Schreck, so effectively frightening as the undead bloodsucker in the original, is no longer merely an actor portraying a vampire. In a twist that could be among the most ingenious in recent memory, a real-life vampire (Willem Dafoe) has been hired by director Murnau (John Malkovich) to play the role of an actor named Schreck who is, in turn, playing a vampire in his new film. And exactly how did Murnau convince a real vampire to star in his movie? By promising him the throat of the leading lady (Catherine McCormack) once filming was completed. For Murnau, it’s the perfect arrangement, the ultimate truth for his artistic endeavor. But can he control the beast he has so callously unleashed on his unsuspecting film crew?

Director Elias Merhige weaves Shadow of the Vampire into an engrossing conflict of artistic accomplishment versus morality. Murnau hides the true nature of his ‘star’, Max Schreck, from his crew, yet while filming on location in Czechoslovakia, everyone realizes there’s something odd about their leading man. For one, his scenes are only shot at night, and he always appears in full makeup wherever he goes. Producer Albin Grau (Udo Kier) chastises Murnau repeatedly for keeping his star so tightly under wraps, yet before long the director starts to lose control. In the early days of shooting, the cameraman, Wolfe (Ronan Vibert), dies, a victim of the beast. Unfortunately for Murnau, Wolfe is merely the first in a string of victims.

The basic thrust of Shadow of the Vampire is the accountability of the artist towards the creation of his art. From the opening scene, it’s apparent that the obsession which drives Murnau is the creation of his film. Murnau believes himself an artist, and his tool, the motion picture camera, is one he is convinced will someday prove more expressive than even paint and canvas. After all, images committed to film, aside from being in motion, are also permanent, and Murnau believes that his films will serve as a testament to future generations of his skill, even of his very existence. It is for this reason, and to this end, that he so willingly offers up the blood of his crew to a monster.

But then who is the real monster of Shadow of the Vampire? Schreck is indeed a monster, but only because nature has made him so. Murnau, on the other hand, risks the lives of those who depend on him, all for the furthering of motion pictures as a legitimate art form. Schreck kills to survive, and to a degree we can pity him his pathetic existence. Murnau’s demons, while equally as personal, are encapsulated within a seemingly selfish personality, and this makes his sins much more difficult to forgive.

As evident in Shadow of the Vampire, the pursuit of a filmmaker, or indeed any artist, to achieve immortality through their work could, if left unchecked, become a double-edged sword, and the thing about a double-edged sword is that there’s simply no way of telling who will be cut by it.

Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted

Spot on review Dave. Ive always dug Merhige's work (Suspect Zero is also criminially obscure and underrated). What struck me most upon reading your take on the film was how much this ties in with the recent movie club podcast subject of Cannibal Holocaust, which puts the savages in the role of the vampire and the doc-film crew in the role of Murnau.

Very little of worth is created without some form of sacrifice the difficulty is determining where to draw the line when the sacrifice on some participants part is not by choice.


That's a smashing hand-painted poster for the film too, I'd never seen that one before.

Andrew James

Nice review Dave! Let's not forget how completely brilliant DeFoe is in this movie. His tonal voice qualities and small mannerisms (particularly in the nose) are fab.

The very first scene in which Schrek shows up and disappears into "the cave" is great too. It's one of the best reaction shots of all time. Director Murnau tells his actor to follow the vampire into the cave. The actor looks back at Murnau (and us) with the most priceless and terrified, "YOU'VE GOT TO BE KIDDING ME!" look on his face.


Great review. I recently saw this after watching Nosferatu and loved every minute of it.

Marina Antunes

I remember the excitement building up to this release (mostly because at the time this came out I worked with a guy who was even more vampire obsessed than I was) and it did not disappoint. It's hard to overlook Merhige message on art though it's never forced. A fantastic little film.

And I loved "Suspect Zero". Aaron Eckhart is great in that little movie.

ross bergeron

this movie was made in a earlier time I remember seeing a movie with the same story