Finite Focus: Death and the Maiden (The Rules of Attraction)
Happy Valentine’s Day folks. To prove that a few of us in the third row have a bit of a macabre sense of humour and romance, todays finite focus continues the theme of teen suicide.
When we were recording Cinecast #78, the subject of Roger Avery’s adaptation of Brett Easton Ellis‘ college-sex-love-pain satire The Rules of Attraction came up. The film seems to have more detractors than defenders, although I lay in the latter camp. There is a style, one that is often relentless, and the willingness to go for the gut punch without undermining the characters (which float between cardboard types yet have so many ‘human touches’ on display too, particularly the ability to hurt others so unconsciously and yet be hurt so easily). There are easily three, perhaps even more, knock out scenes in the film. The other two are Victor’s European vacation montage, as well as a split-screen sequence that ends with two characters (and their respective split screens) merging as they meet.
But I want to focus on this particular on screen suicide (yay Valentine’s Day). The scene is glamourized to the point where it is completely irresponsible. But before we get all high and mighty about the this sort of thing consider that the film (and for that matter most of Ellis‘ novels) is giving us satire; and unfortunately satire is often a misunderstood art. On display for this sequence is the pop song “Without You” providing a cozy soundtrack; along with close-up shots of Theresa Wayman’s face, a mix of sadness, pain, desire, resignation (?); ; fetishizing the event by lighting candles; a shot of jewelry and a razor blade; explicit opening of veins; a bathtub of blood with artfully deceased body; and finally, a nice cinematic short-hand of the drops of water running, running, slowing, stopping. It is a tour-de-force sequence of pointless and selfish angst elevated to epic tragedy. And the kicker is that this character does not even have a name, barely any of the other characters in the film even notice her up to the point where she is a dead body. Yes, it’s dark. But I will vouchsafe that it is great pop-art too. I think Andy Warhol would be proud.
Check the video out behind the cut.












With the rest of the movie though, it is a completely different tone and it jerked me out of the movie so hard I ended up not liking the movie as much. Whenever I watch this movie now, I almost always turn it off just before this point. Because the other scenes you mentioned are terrific (see show notes for Cinecast 78 for the other GREAT scene).
I also like the Michel Gondry-esque backwards’ shot through the party (I think it’s near the beginning).
Comment by Andrew James — February 14, 2008 @ 9:14 am
(a facile description of Ex Drummer (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0812243/ ) would be Trainspotting meets Man Bites Dog)
Comment by Kurt Halfyard — February 14, 2008 @ 9:28 am
“It’s Dick. And yes”. It’s good to hear you defending this movie.
Comment by Rusty James — February 14, 2008 @ 7:51 pm
It’s funny how much I hate Bret Easton Ellis’s novels, yet I find the two recent films (American Psycho, The Rules of Attraction) to be so compelling and vibrant.
Comment by Kurt Halfyard — February 15, 2008 @ 7:34 am
Do you like? Not deep enough? Too Deep? etc. All comments and criticisms welcome.
Comment by Kurt Halfyard — February 15, 2008 @ 3:37 pm
Hence very little commentary by me on the last few. Having said that, it does usually encourag me to put the film in my queue, so all is good with me.
Comment by Andrew James — February 15, 2008 @ 4:17 pm
Comment by Marina Antunes — February 15, 2008 @ 5:39 pm
Comment by Rusty James — February 15, 2008 @ 7:10 pm
Comment by Henrik — February 17, 2008 @ 3:21 pm
Comment by Goon — February 14, 2009 @ 12:34 am
Comment by Kurt Halfyard — February 14, 2009 @ 8:27 am