• Review: Cassandra’s Dream

    Cassandra’s Dream poster

    Director: Woody Allen (Annie Hall, Manhattan, Hannah and Her Sisters, Match Point, Scoop)
    Writer: Woody Allen
    Producers: Stephen Tenenbaum, Gareth Wiley, Letty Aronson
    Starring: Colin Farrell, Ewan McGregor, Tom Wilkinson, Hayley Atwell, Sally Hawkins
    MPAA Rating: PG-13
    Running time: 108 min



    Being not particularly much of a Woody Allen fan, I was completely blown away by his 2005 effort, Match Point. Following that was a dismal attempt at light-hearted romantic comedy in the way of Scoop. All but destroyed by critics, Allen returned to the drawing board to recreate what seems to work best for him: the Sunday evening thriller. Unfortunately you can tell that that is exactly what he attempted to do; recreate a success. But successes aren’t cloned, they’re meticulously crafted.

    McGregor and FarrelThe film starts with Ian and Terry (McGregor and Farrell); two brothers on the edge of being successful if they could just clear a couple of financial hurdles. When those hurdles prove to be too big for either of them, they request the help of their rich uncle played by Tom Wilkinson. He agrees to help, but in return, he asks that they “get rid of” a traitorous informant to his business that will ruin him forever should the informant be allowed to testify. Reluctantly… very reluctantly, the brothers agree to the caper. From there, it’s planning and building the psychological strength to pull off the murder. But paranoia and fear, along with some small, unforseen obstacles that spring up along the way, keep the brothers from completing a simple task and turning it into a nightmare for both of them.

    Allen has this great knack of building up suspense and tension and holding it over our heads for as long as possible. Just when we think there’s to be a sense of relief, Allen pulls one more block from the Jenga stack and forces his audience to endure more tension than they bargained for and sustain that anxiety until we see another tactical block of suspense about to be removed from the Jenga stack. Collapse is inevitable, but the build-up to that collapse is nearly unbearable.

    Wilkinson and McGregorThe story isn’t all that complicated and doesn’t force much thought from the audience, but thought isn’t what keeps us in our seats; it’s the tension. One problem leads to another and builds and builds until the pressure cooker is sure to explode. The problem is that there isn’t really a lot to chew on afterwards. The story unfolds and presents itself to us in the simplest of terms. This isn’t necessarily a bad thing, just don’t go looking for something to challenge you… it isn’t there. Not like it was in Match Point.

    The other problem lies with the casting. McGregor seems to hold his own and there isn’t any more praises that can be given to Wilkinson. He’s terrific as always. The problem lies with two characters: Farrell’s Terry and Hayley Atwell’s Angela (McGregor’s love interest). The problem with Farrell as that he is horribly miscast. The character of Terry is frightened and whiny. Collin Farrell’s persona just doesn’t convey this character well at all. There’s nothing wrong with the acting, Farrell exhibits an honorable attempt with what he’s given, but we all know Farrell to be too cool for school and this role just doesn’t suit him. With Angela, there doesn’t seem to be any reason for the character. Far too much time is spent with this character that seems to be in the movie for no apparent reason other than sex appeal and to consume time. This character might’ve taken the story to new heights had she been utilized in some sort of plot twist or really had anything to do with the plot at all. Alas, she does not.

    Still, as noted, the story does well at carrying an audience to the brink of frustration for long periods of time and it’s extremely well shot. This particular brand of Allen is very much indebted to the great Hitchcock-ian thrillers of his time. Despite a few instances of questionable dialogue and a running time that does feel a bit long, Cassandra’s Dream is enough to please the easiest of film goers. A tense, fairly undramatic thriller that unfolds nicely, but will leave the more adventurous film goers looking for more. To keep it short and sweet though, I basically liked it quite a bit; but I’d like Allen to shoot a little higher next time or my new found appreciation for his work will certainly dwindle.



    Links:
    IMDb profile – full cast and crew
    Official Site
    Flixster Profile for Cassandra’s Dream

6 Comments


  1. rot says:

    you are too kind Andrew… this is a piece of shit by a director who should know better. I saw it at TIFF and I found it laughable… and the next day in the paper Woody Allen was quoted as saying he is no longer interested in filmmaking, and boy does that show up in the arbitrary mechanics of this film… Woody made that film about a director going blind but directing anyways and I think he anticipated this… there are so many film flubs, and such a lousy ending… such a complete waste of time.

  2. Marina Antunes says:

    I still haven’t seen “Match Point” but I thought “Scoop” was fun for Saturday afternoon mindless fun. Not completely sold on this though I will admit to being excited to see Farrell and McGregor. I may just wait for the DVD.

  3. Dave Becker says:

    I had all but given up on Woody after Anything Else, but then, like Andrew says, he blew me away with Match Point (It topped my list of 2005 films, actually). Still, Woody’s misses far outnumber his hits nowadays.

  4. Ashley Townsend says:

    I’m conflicted. I *hated* Match Point, so I probably wouldn’t like this too much … but I Loooooove Colin Farrell, and don’t mind McGregor either, and I’ve seen both of them in far worse movies. Maybe this’ll be good for a DVD rental…

  5. Andrew James says:

    Definitely worth a DVD rental. I liked it, but this should be the end of this kind of story for Allen. He needs to move on. Maybe he should do a war picture or a sci-fi spectacle. That’d get the critics and pundits talking.

  6. John Allison says:

    I watched this last night and the pacing felt really weird for the first half. I was actually saying to myself I wish he would slow down a bit. It was shot after shot in rapid fire. Which is strange that it felt like that because there really wasn’t a lot happening. I wanted the camera to linger a lot more than it did.

    I will give it props for one thing. Right about the time that the murder happens I was thinking that I would really like a movie where nothing really goes bad during.

    Overall though the movie just felt sort of off for me. I should have enjoyed it more than I did but as it is I didn’t hate it but I didn’t like it either.

Leave a comment