<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scorsese Does Hitchcock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rowthree.com/2007/12/04/scorsese-does-hitchcock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rowthree.com/2007/12/04/scorsese-does-hitchcock/</link>
	<description>Where Cinema is more than just $100 Million productions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:49:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.rowthree.com/2007/12/04/scorsese-does-hitchcock/#comment-1228</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 06:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rowthree.com/2007/12/04/scorsese-does-hitchcock/#comment-1228</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not really sure how it cheapens anything. It was made very tongue-in-cheek, mockumentary style and it was just them having some fun with it all. Scorsese is well known for preserving film, so it&#039;s definitely poking some fun at that (&quot;It’s one thing to preserve a film that has been made, it’s another to preserve a film that has not been made.&quot;)

It&#039;s one of the best advertisements that I can remember, that&#039;s for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not really sure how it cheapens anything. It was made very tongue-in-cheek, mockumentary style and it was just them having some fun with it all. Scorsese is well known for preserving film, so it&#8217;s definitely poking some fun at that (&#8220;It’s one thing to preserve a film that has been made, it’s another to preserve a film that has not been made.&#8221;)</p>
<p>It&#8217;s one of the best advertisements that I can remember, that&#8217;s for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samantha</title>
		<link>http://www.rowthree.com/2007/12/04/scorsese-does-hitchcock/#comment-1210</link>
		<dc:creator>Samantha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 00:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rowthree.com/2007/12/04/scorsese-does-hitchcock/#comment-1210</guid>
		<description>I dunno, guys ... somehow I feel it cheapens everybody .. 
Great fan of real life HItch and real life Marty .. but, brother. What is this ... Mickey Mouse-ing Hitch with a bottle of not-very-good-quality champagne? At least Scorsese coulda held out for Dom Perignon.
Not done as sublty as possible .. birds hould&#039;ve been completely quiet at the end ... color palatte was just a little too colorful ... Grace was not, Grace ...
Music was the best thing , because, well, it WAS the same music.
Who are we kidding?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno, guys &#8230; somehow I feel it cheapens everybody ..<br />
Great fan of real life HItch and real life Marty .. but, brother. What is this &#8230; Mickey Mouse-ing Hitch with a bottle of not-very-good-quality champagne? At least Scorsese coulda held out for Dom Perignon.<br />
Not done as sublty as possible .. birds hould&#8217;ve been completely quiet at the end &#8230; color palatte was just a little too colorful &#8230; Grace was not, Grace &#8230;<br />
Music was the best thing , because, well, it WAS the same music.<br />
Who are we kidding?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: murph</title>
		<link>http://www.rowthree.com/2007/12/04/scorsese-does-hitchcock/#comment-627</link>
		<dc:creator>murph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rowthree.com/2007/12/04/scorsese-does-hitchcock/#comment-627</guid>
		<description>the whole thing is riddled with North by Northwest references

this is probably the best advertisement i have EVER seen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the whole thing is riddled with North by Northwest references</p>
<p>this is probably the best advertisement i have EVER seen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew James</title>
		<link>http://www.rowthree.com/2007/12/04/scorsese-does-hitchcock/#comment-605</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 07:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rowthree.com/2007/12/04/scorsese-does-hitchcock/#comment-605</guid>
		<description>Pretty funny.  I caught a couple of Rear Window references there towards the end.  Also The Birds thing at the end is pretty amusing (The birds as sort of Hitchcock&#039;s spirit).

The rest of the parts with Scorsese speaking are equally amusing.  &quot;I&#039;m going to make the movie as he would... then.  But now.  If he were doing the movie today, we would be doing it now, but like he would&#039;ve then... only now.&quot;  Gold.  Nice find Jonathan.

&lt;center&gt;
~ For Your Consideration ~
~ Javier Bardem ~
BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE
&lt;/center&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty funny.  I caught a couple of Rear Window references there towards the end.  Also The Birds thing at the end is pretty amusing (The birds as sort of Hitchcock&#8217;s spirit).</p>
<p>The rest of the parts with Scorsese speaking are equally amusing.  &#8220;I&#8217;m going to make the movie as he would&#8230; then.  But now.  If he were doing the movie today, we would be doing it now, but like he would&#8217;ve then&#8230; only now.&#8221;  Gold.  Nice find Jonathan.</p>
<p><center><br />
~ For Your Consideration ~<br />
~ Javier Bardem ~<br />
BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE<br />
</center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.rowthree.com/2007/12/04/scorsese-does-hitchcock/#comment-531</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 08:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rowthree.com/2007/12/04/scorsese-does-hitchcock/#comment-531</guid>
		<description>as a huge fan of both directors, that is one of the sweetest cross promotion/homage pieces i&#039;ve ever seen. hitchcock was nothing short of genius, and scorsese recalled that brilliance beautifully and tastefully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as a huge fan of both directors, that is one of the sweetest cross promotion/homage pieces i&#8217;ve ever seen. hitchcock was nothing short of genius, and scorsese recalled that brilliance beautifully and tastefully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

